Crohn’s disease (CD) is one of inflammatory bowel diseases, characterized by lifelong relapsing-remitting clinical course. The choice of treatment protocols is based on the comprehensive evaluation of the disease. And the treatment protocols should be adjusted according to the response to the treatment and the drug tolerance. Repeated assessment of the activity of intestinal inflammation is very necessary. Each of endoscopy, Crohn’s Disease Activity Index, CT, magnetic resonance enterography, and ultrasonography (US) has its own disadvantages. US is widely used in clinical practice because of its no radiation, convenience, low cost, and high degree of patient tolerance. The two-dimensional ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound, elastosonography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography each provides some effective parameters for evaluation of CD activity. Some parameters are of high value, such as bowl wall thichness, bowl wall stratification, color Doppler signal, strain ratio, and relative enhancement, etc. The values of some parameters are disputed, such as the blood flow of superior mesenteric artery, time to peak, etc. Some studies combine several ultrasound parameters and calculate their respective weights to obtain an ultrasound scoring method. US, as a valid tool to evaluate CD activity, provides valuable help in solving clinical problems such as evaluation of therapeutic effect, mucosal healing, and postoperative recurrence.
Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an important examination for rectal tumors. The inhomogeneity of the CEUS images has important clinical significance. However, there is no objective method to evaluate this index. In this study, a method based on gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) is proposed to extract texture features of images and grade these images according the inhomogeneity. Specific processes include compressing the gray level of the image, calculating the texture statistics of gray level co-occurrence matrix, combining feature selection and principal component analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction, and training and validating quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). After ten cross-validation, the overall accuracy rate of machine classification was 87.01%, and the accuracy of each level was as follows: Grade Ⅰ 52.94%, Grade Ⅱ 96.48% and Grade Ⅲ 92.35% respectively. The proposed method has high accuracy in judging grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ images, which can help to identify the grade of inhomogeneity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound images of rectal tumors, and may be used to assist clinical doctors in judging the grade of inhomogeneity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of rectal tumors.
ObjectiveTo explore the value of multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion in the comprehensive treatment of HER-2 positive breast cancer.MethodThe clinical data of 2 patients with HER-2 positive breast cancer admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University after MDT discussions were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsCase 1 was a 32-year-old woman diagnosed with left breast non-special type invasive carcinoma at admission, cT2N1M0, stage ⅡB, WHO grade 2, ER (–), PR (–), HER-2 (+++), Ki-67 (+, 20%). After MDT discussion, the patient was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 6 cycles, and the efficacy evaluation was partial response, received left breast conserving surgery and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), postoperative staging ypT1aN1ycM0, stage ⅡA, Miller-Payne grade 4, the patient was satisfied with the shape of breast, received radiotherapy and anti-HER-2 therapy after surgery. At present, there was no recurrence and metastasis during anti-HER-2 therapy. Case 2 was diagnosed with right breast non-special type invasive carcinoma at admission, cT3N0M0, stage ⅡB, WHO grade 3, ER (–), PR (–), HER-2 (+++), Ki-67 (+, 40%), local advanced breast cancer. After MDT discussion, the patient was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 2 cycles, and the efficacy evaluation was progressive disease. After the replacement of two neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen, the efficacy evaluation was still progressive disease. Finally after MDT discussion, the patient received right breast mastectomy and ALND, postoperative staging ypT4bN1ycM0, stage ⅢB, Miller-Payne grade 1, received radiotherapy, adjuvant treatment with pyrotinib and capecitabine after surgery. The patient was followed up for 3 months by telephone, the patient did not follow the doctor’ instructions, no recurrence and metastasis was found in the review.ConclusionUnder the precision medical system, comprehensive treatment of breast cancer based on the MDT model could target patients’ disease characteristics, physical conditions, previous diagnosis and treatment, family situation, and other individual factors, formulate the best personal treatment plan for patients, and bring greater benefits to patients.