ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of cervical disc replacement for cervical myelopathy. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2008, 20 patients (26 segments) with cervical myelopathy underwent single-level (14 segments) or bi-level (6 segments) cervical disc replacement. There were 8 males and 12 females with an average age of 46 years (range, 26-65 years). The disease duration ranged 2-18 months (mean, 7 months). The effectiveness was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) score, cervical range of motion (ROM), and the Odom et al. criteria. Heterotopic ossification (HO), osteophyte formation, and prosthesis loosening were observed. ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention, with no severe complication. Twenty patients were followed up 30-48 months (mean, 34 months). At 28 months after operation, according to Odom et al. criteria, the results were excellent in 17 cases and good in 3 cases. The VAS scores of the neck, shoulder, and upper limb were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P lt; 0.05). At 30 months after operation, X-ray films showed that 20 replaced segments were mobile and ROM was (10.6 ± 4.5)°, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) when compared with that of upper adjacent segment (10.8 ± 3.7)° and lower adjacent segment (7.5 ± 4.2)°. HO occurred in 10 cases (13 segments). No displacement, subsidence, or loosening occurred except 1 case of retrodisplacement of the prosthesis. ConclusionCervical disc replacement can obtain good effectiveness. It can maintain normal cervical ROM and physiological curvature. But it needs further long-term follow-up to evaluate the function and the influence on the adjacent segments.
Objective To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of spinal pedicle screw internal fixation through endoscope-assisted posterior approach for the treatment of traumatic atlantoaxial instability. Methods Between September 2008 and September 2010, 44 patients with traumatic atlantoaxial instability received spinal pedicle screw internal fixation through endoscope-assisted posterior operation (micro-invasive surgical therapy group, n=22) or traditional surgical therapy (control group, n=22). There was no significant difference in gender, age, type of injury, disease duration, and preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The blood loss, operation time, length of the incision, improvement rate of JOA, and graft fusion rates were compared between 2 groups to assess the clinical outcomes. Results The blood loss, operation time, and length of the incision in the micro-invasive surgical therapy group were better than those in control group (P lt; 0.05). All incisions were primary healing. Of 88 pedicle screws, 7 pedicle screws penetrated into the interior walls of cervical transverse foramen in the micro-invasive surgical therapy group and 8 in the control group, but there was no syndrome of vertebral artery injury. All patients of the 2 groups were followed up 12 to 37 months (mean, 26 months). Bony fusion was achieved in all cases within 3 to 12 months (mean, 5.3 months). No loosening or breakage of screw occurred. At 6 months to 1 year after operation, the internal fixator was removed in 6 cases and the function of head and neck rotary movement were almost renewed. The JOA score was significantly improved at last follow-up when compared with preoperative score (P lt; 0.05), and no significant difference in JOA score and improvement rate between the 2 groups at last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The micro-invasive surgical therapy can acquire the same effectiveness to the traditional surgical therapy in immediate recovery of stability, high graft fusion rate, and less complication. Moreover, it can significantly reduce the operation time, blood loss, and soft tissue injury, so this approach may be an ideal way of internal fixation to treat traumatic atlantoaxial instability.
Objective To evaluate differences of clinical effects between cervical total disc replacement (TDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for single symptomatic single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE (2000 to May 2009), EMbase (2000 to May 2009), Ovid (2000 to May 2009), CBM (2000 to May 2009) and CNKI (2000 to May 2009) were electronically searched. Additionally, six relevant journals were handsearched to identify RCTs about comparison of TDR and ACDF in the treatment of single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. All RCTs demonstrating these issues were included. RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses. Results Six RCTs involving 1 340 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses indicated that there were significant differences between the two groups in neurological success (RR=1.06, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.11, P=0.003), secondary surgical procedures (RR=0.30, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.53, Plt;0.0001) and overall success (RR=1.13, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.22, P=0.0006). However, there were no significant differences in Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores (WMD=1.53, 95%CI –0.55 to 3.61, P=0.15), neck pain scores (WMD= –2.87, 95%CI 7.75 to 1.81, P=0.23), arm pain scores (WMD= –0.7, 95%CI –0.86 to –0.54, P=0.48), radiography success (RR=0.96, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.01, P=0.11), and postoperative complications (RR=0.79, 95%CI 0.49 to 1.28, P=0.34) between the two groups. Conclusion The evidence indicates that compared with ACDF, TDR could improve neurological status, reduce secondary surgical procedures and promote overall success for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease, but there are no significant differences in postoperative NDI, neck and arm pain scores, radiography success, and complications.