目的 探究静脉利多卡因联合异丙酚在无痛胃镜麻醉应用中的可行性、安全性和有效性。 方法 纳入2012年4月－5月行无痛胃镜检查的患者102例，随机分为两组：利多卡因组（L组）和生理盐水组（S组）。L组于麻醉诱导前缓慢静注2%利多卡因2 mg/kg，S组给予相同容量的生理盐水。比较两组间的异丙酚诱导剂量、追加剂量和总量，以及检查中呛咳反应、体动的发生率，麻醉时间，不良事件和不良反应发生率，麻醉医生和患者满意度是否有差异。 结果 L组较S组异丙酚诱导剂量减少约0.17 mg/kg，差异有统计学意义（P=0.03）；余指标差异均无统计学意义。 结论 将静脉利多卡因用于无痛胃镜麻醉，虽能减少异丙酚诱导剂量，但减少程度并不明显；不能改善诱导前后血流动力学的剧烈波动，也未能缩短总的麻醉时间；在抑制术中呛咳反应、体动方面也未见明显优势。无论是从安全性还是经济学方面考虑，我们都不推荐将静脉利多卡因联合异丙酚麻醉的方案用于无痛胃镜检查。
Objective To explore the effect of restrictive fluid administration on elderly patients with colorectal cancer in fasttrack.Methods From January 2008 to January 2009, the elderly patients (≥60 years old) diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively, the clinical effects on post-operative early rehabilitation were studied and the difference between restrictive fluid regimen and tradition fluid regimen was compared. Results The difference of overall incidence of post-operative complications was statistically significant between the two groups (Plt;0.05). The incidences of anastomotic leakage and pulmonary infection of fluid restriction group were lower than those of tradition therapy group (Plt;0.05). The time of vent to normal, defecation to normal and postoperative first eating of fluid restriction group was shorter than those of tradition therapy group, the difference was statistically significant (Plt;0.05). Comparing the biochemical indicators, the difference of preoperative GLU 〔（6.70±2.93） mmol/L vs. （6.33±3.95） mmol/L〕, BUN 〔(5.84±2.03) mmol/L vs. （7.32±10.83） mmol/L〕and CREA 〔(76.19±19.85) μmol/L vs. （85.36±38.02） μmol/L)〕 was statistically significant (Plt;0.05), but the difference of postoperative results had no statistical significance. Conclusion Restrictive fluid regimen can reduce the incidence of common complications after colorectal surgery for elderly patients, and have a certain promoter action to the early rehabilitation after rectal surgery.