As a science which focuses on evidence, the decision making process of evidence medicine encounters an opportunity for development in the big data era. The starting point is shifting forward from evidence to data. The big data technology is playing an active role in evidence's collection, process and utilization. Evidence is more objective, righteous, authentic, transparent and easier to collect. Thus, to initiate evidence-based medicine research in the big data era and to structure an evidence-based medicine intelligent service platform, a full-scaled strategy should be developed in order to improve the quality of evidence. To promote the complete publicity of clinical research data, structuralized clinical data standard should be constructed. To provide a pathway to patients' follow-up data, portable and wearable monitoring devices should be popularized. To avoid risks from utilization of clinical research big data, regulations of clinical data usage should be implemented.
Real-world data (RWD) in clinical research on specific categories of medical devices can generate sufficient quality evidence which will be used in decision making. This paper discusses the limitations of traditional randomized controlled trials in clinical research of medical devices, summarizes and analyses the applicable conditions of real-world evidence (RWE) for medical devices, interprets the new FDA guidance document on the characteristics of RWD for medical devices, in order to provide evidence for the use of RWE in medical devices in our country.
With the encouragement of national policy on drug and medical device innovation, multi-center clinical trials and multi-regional clinical trials are facing an unprecedented opportunity in China. Trials with a multi-center design are far more common at present than before. However, it should be recognized there still exists shortcomings in current multi-center trials. In this paper, we summarize the problems and challenges and provide corresponding resolutions with the aim to reduce heterogeneity between study centers and avoid excessive center effects in treatment. It is urgent to develop design, implementation and reporting guidelines to improve the overall quality of multi-center clinical trials.
The concept of clinical trial transparency has been promoted for more than 40 years. The act of clinical trial registration, report guidelines development, and data sharing has has been strongly pushed forward and become a common practice. The clinical trial process being the key procedure of trial operation and quality control, determines the accuracy of the results. However, the process report of clinical trials is insufficient. In this article, we summarize the importance of clinical trial process report and provide corresponding suggestions. We propose that medical journals, reporting guidelines developers and clinical trial registration platforms should work together to strengthen the process report of clinical trials and promote full transparency of clinical trials.
Data integrity, accuracy, and traceability are key elements of high-quality clinical research, as well as weak links in the promotion of clinical research transparency. How to promote data quality has become a major concern to all clinical research stakeholders. In this article, we dissected and analyzed data generation and capturing process in clinical research, and identified a key aspect in improving data quality: to promote electronic source data, especially to break the barrier between electronic health records and clinical research systems. Additionally, we summarized the experiences regarding this issue in China and overseas to propose a solution suitable for China to improve data quality in clinical research: to strengthen clinical research source data management by building clinical research source data platform and adopt common source data management process in hospitals.
ObjectivesTo establish an appropriate data governance mode in according with the database status of clinical study.MethodsForty-six doctors of different seniority with clinical research experience from six hospitals in Beijing were selected by stratified purposeful sampling and semi-structured interview and were used to understand the status and shortcomings of data acquisition and storage in clinical research. The data resource of current clinical studies were summarized and the main target of data governance and the characteristics of clinical study data were explored to establish the domains of clinical study data governance to construct the framework of clinical research data governance.ResultsCurrently, the data sources of clinical studies were diverse, including real-world data from various medical and health records, data collected independently for clinical studies and numerous other sources. However, since collecting the data from electronic medical records was difficult for numerous reasons, a large number of researchers still collected research data by hand writing and stored it insecurely. In addition, the combination of electronic information from multiple sources was difficult. Building ALCOA+CCEA standard clinical research data management system based on clinical research data governance was urgent. Data governance includes data architecture, data model, data standards, data quality, master data, timeliness management, metadata and data security, while life cycle management and data insight were not essential parts.ConclusionsBased on the real-world data resources, domains of data governance in clinical study should include data architecture, data model, data standards, data quality, master data, timeliness management, metadata and data security.
ObjectiveTo construct a strategy for classification of clinical research data security for real-world research, based on the features of clinical research data.MethodsBased on the laws, regulations, and data security classification method in relevant fields, the clinical research data was classified into five security levels. Then, the method was gradually perfected through three times of revisions, which followed the advice from experts who were experienced in many relative areas, such as clinical medicine, clinical research methodology, clinical research management, ethics, genetics and public health data application and management.ResultsExperts’ opinions gradually converged through several times of consultation. The clinical research data was finally classified into five security levels with explicit definition and security policy for each security level. Thirty-three data categories, which covered demographic information, clinical examination, diagnosis, treatment information, genetic information, health economics information, medical data and information on research processes that have been published, were included in the five security levels.ConclusionsSince there is an increasing trend of data scale and the data security classification and management are necessary to ensure the data security and appropriately utilization of data. The method of clinical research data classification proposed in this paper can provide beneficial references for the further improvement of data security in the future.