Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rosiglitazone versus metformin in treating polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about rosiglitazone versus metformin in treating PCOS were retrieved on computer in MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, EBSCO, CBM, CNKI, Chinese Medical Association Journal Database and VIP from the date of their establishment to December 2010. The trials were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers independently, the data were extracted, the methodological quality was assessed, and finally meta-analysis was conducted with Stata 11.0 software. Results A total of six RCTs involving 286 PCOS patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that there was no significant difference between rosiglitazone and metformin in improving PCOS patients’ insulin sensitivity (SMD= –0.14, 95%CI –0.46 to 0.19, P=0.412) and lowering androgen levels (SMD=0.05, 95%CI –0.26 to 0.36, P=0.747). However, the effect of rosiglitazone was inferior to metformin in lowing patients’ weight with a significant difference (SMD=0.34, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.58, P=0.004). The rosiglitazone showed a lower incidence rate of adverse reaction compared with metformin. Conclusion Compared with metformin, the rosiglitazone is eqully effective in improving PCOS patients’ insulin sensitivity and lowering androgen levels, and has a lower incidence rate of adverse reaction although it is inferior to metformin in lowing patients’ weight. So rosiglitazone is more applicable for the patients who are of underweight or cannot tolerate the gastrointestinal side effects induced by metformin. There is no enough evidence for this conclusion due to the small sample size and limited number of RCTs. More high-quality, large-sample and multicentered RCTs are required to guide clinical treatment and benefit patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of gender and age on the posterior cranial fossa linear volume and cerebellar tonsil position in normal populations.MethodsA total of 180 normal adults who underwent cervical MRI examination at the physical examination center were selected, including 90 males and 90 females; the age ranged from 20 to 79 years, with an average of 50.4 years. The posterior cranial fossa linear volume and cerebellar tonsil position were measured by two spine surgeons on the mid-sagittal plane of the cervical MRI T2-weighted image. The posterior cranial fossa linear volume included the length of clivus (AB), anteroposterior diameter of foramen magnum (BC), length of supraocciput (CD), anteroposterior diameter of posterior fossa (DA), posterior fossa height (BE), and clivus angle (∠α). The index of the cerebellar tonsil position was the distance from the lower edge of the cerebellar tonsil to the baseline (MN). The differences of each indicators between males and females were compared, and the correlations between age and each indicators were analyzed.ResultsThe posterior fossa cranial linear volume AB, BC, CD, BE, and ∠α in males were significantly larger than those in females (P<0.05); DA in males was larger than that in females, but showing no significant difference (t=1.978, P=0.050). The cerebellar tonsil position (MN) in females was higher than that in males, but showing no significant difference (t=0.526, P=0.600). Correlation analysis showed that age was negatively correlated with AB, BC, CD, DA, BE, ∠α, and MN (r=−0.375, P=0.001; r=−0.417, P=0.001; r=−0.046, P=0.001; r=−0.244, P=0.001; r=−0.326, P=0.001; r=−0.320, P=0.001; r=−0.334, P=0.001).ConclusionThe posterior cranial fossa linear volume of normal adults is significantly larger in males than in females; the posterior cranial fossa linear volume and the cerebellar tonsil position may have a decreasing process of age-related degeneration.
Thoracolumbar injury is a common injury in clinic. Accurate diagnosis and classification is of great significance for guiding treatment. Although there are many typing systems, no typing system has been widely accepted and used to guide clinical practice. Denis classification, spinal load classification, thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score or thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score and AO classification have great influence in clinical practice, but they all have some shortcomings. In recent years, the classification of thoracolumbar injury has been updated, modified and supplemented constantly. When using these fracture types in clinical practice, different people often have some deviation. This paper reviews the widely used thoracolumbar injury classification system, discusses the main viewpoints, advantages and disadvantages of each classification system, and looks into the future research direction based on the current research progress.
Objective To investigate the microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery and traditional open surgery for the treatment of cervical myelopathy with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods Retrospective selection of patients with OPLL who underwent microscope-assisted and traditional open anterior cervical surgery in West China (Airport) Hospital Sichuan University were selected between January 2016 and August 2020. The patients who underwent traditional open anterior cervical surgery between January 2016 and August 2018 were classified as the conventional group, and the patients who underwent microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery between September 2018 and August 2020 were classified as the microscope group. The baseline characteristics, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain before and after surgery, and surgical complications were collected. Neurological function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Result A total of 46 patients were included. There were 24 cases in the conventional group and 22 cases in the microscope group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay in the microscope group were lower than those in the conventional group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in VSA score and JOA score between the two groups before operation (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in VAS score and JOA score between the two groups 18 months after operation (P<0.001). The comparison of VAS score and JOA score in the two groups before and after operation showed that there was a statistically significant difference between 18 months after operation and before operation (P<0.05). In the microscope group, the average improvement rate of neurological function [(79.90±16.67)% vs. (58.12±17.47)%, t=4.317, P<0.001], excellent and good rate [95.45% (21/22) vs. 66.67% (16/24), χ2=4.354, P=0.037] were higher than those in the conventional group. The total number of complications in the microscope group was lower than that in the conventional group (P=0.024). Conclusion Compared with the traditional open anterior cervical surgery, the microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery for OPLL can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
ObjectiveTo analyze and compare the clinical efficacy and safety between one-stage operation and staged operation in the treatment of tandem spinal stenosis (TSS).MethodsThe data of 39 patients with TSS were retrospectively analyzed, who were definitely diagnosed and treated surgically between February 2011 and March 2016 in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University. According to whether one-stage decompression was performed, the patients were divided into group A (cervical and lumbar vertebral canal decompression procedures were performed in one stage, n=21) and group B (cervical and lumbar spinal canal decompression procedures were performed in two stages with a time interval of 3-6 months, n=18). Both one-stage and staged operations were performed by the same surgical team. The Nurick scores, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores of cervical spine and lumbar spine, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before operation and in postoperative follow-up, postoperative JOA improvement rate, and perioperative indicators were recorded and compared.ResultsAll patients completed the operations successfully, and the lengths of follow-up were all longer than 12 months. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, preoperative duration of symptoms, preoperative Kang grade, preoperative Schizas grade, preoperative underlying diseases, preoperative cervical or lumbar spine JOA score, preoperative ODI, preoperative Nurick score, decompression segment or distribution, or length of follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05). The Nurick score, JOA score of cervical and lumbar spine, and ODI at one year after operation and the last follow-up were significantly improved compared with those before operation. The one-year after operation improvement rates of JOA of cervical and lumbar spine in group A were significantly higher than those in group B [cervical spine: (70.55±9.28)% vs. (55.29±7.82)%, P<0.05; lumbar spine: (69.50±4.95)% vs. (51.58±7.62)%, P<0.05], but there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of JOA between the two groups at the last follow-up (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in Nurick score or ODI between the two groups at one year after operation or the last follow-up (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the average length of hospital stay between the two groups [(15.67±3.40) vs. (15.72±1.57) d, P>0.05]. The operation time [(293.10±43.83) vs. (244.44±22.29) min] and intraoperative bleeding [(533.33±180.51) vs. (380.56±38.88) mL] in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications of group A was higher than that of group B (57.1% vs. 16.7%, P<0.05).ConclusionsCompared with staged surgery, one-stage operation in the treatment of TSS has a significant improvement in neurological function and clinical efficacy in short-term follow-up, but there is no significant difference in long-term follow-up. Staged surgery has the advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, lower postoperative complication rate, and higher safety.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of ascending aorta banding technique combined with typeⅠhybrid aortic arch repair for the aortic arch diseases. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing ascending aorta banding technique combined with type Ⅰ hybrid arch repair for aortic arch diseases from March 2019 to March 2022 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The technical success, perioperative complications and follow-up results were evaluated. Results A total of 44 patients were collected, including 35 males and 9 females, with a median age of 63.0 (57.5, 64.6) years. The average EuroSCORE Ⅱ score was 8.4%±0.7%. The technical success rate was 100.0%. All patients did not have retrograde type A aortic dissection and endoleaks. One patient died of multiple organ failure 5 days after operation, the in-hospital mortality rate was 2.3%, and the remaining 43 patients survived and were discharged from hospital. The median follow-up period was 14.5 (6-42) months with a follow-up rate of 100.0%. One patient with spinal cord injury died 2 years after hospital discharge. One patient underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair at postoperative 3 months due to new entry tears near to the distal end of the stent. Conclusion Ascending aorta banding combined with typeⅠhybrid arch repair for the aortic arch diseases does not need cardio-pulmonary bypass. Ascending aorta banding technique strengthens the proximal anchoring area of the stent to avoid risks such as retrograde type A dissection, endoleak and migration. The operation owns small trauma, rapid recovery, low mortality and a low rate of reintervention, which may be considered as a safe and effective choice in the treatment of the elderly, high-risk patients with complex complications.
Objective To explore the timing of indwelling urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia by a prospective randomized controlled study. Methods Male patients who underwent orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia in the First People’s Hospital of Shuangliu District between September 2019 and January 2021 were selected prospectively. The patients were randomly assigned to group A (pull out the catheter before anesthesia) and group B (pull out the catheter within 24 hours after anesthesia) at a ratio of 1∶1 by sortition. The age, operation duration, operation site, heart rate when pulling out the catheter, first urination, urinary tract infection, patient comfort score, nursing satisfaction score and patient satisfaction related indicators of the two groups were recorded and analyzed. Results A total of 120 patients were included in the study. All patients successfully completed the trial without dropping out or quitting. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, operation duration and operation site (P>0.05). No urinary tract infection occurred in both groups. There was no significant difference in the first urination between the two groups (P>0.05). The heart rate of patients in group A when pulling out the catheter was slower than that of group B [(74.62 ± 11.38) vs. (84.52 ± 8.98) times/min], and the satisfaction of patients in group A (group A: 46 cases were satisfied, 11 cases were relatively satisfied, 3 cases were dissatisfied; group B: 17 cases were satisfied, 25 cases were relatively satisfied, 18 cases were dissatisfied), comfort score (17.82±2.73 vs. 16.68±2.13), and nursing satisfaction score (19.62±1.59 vs. 16.32±2.05) were better than those in group B (P<0.05). Conclusions For male patients who need catheterization before orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia, pulling out the catheter before waking up after anesthesia can effectively reduce the physiological stress reaction of patients, reduce discomfort, improve patient satisfaction, and reduce the workload of nurses after surgery, which is conducive to early rehabilitation exercise of patients.