ObjectiveTo explore the expression of chloride intracellular channel protein 1 (CLIC1) protein in the matched colorectal normal mucosa tissue, colorectal adenoma tissue， and colorectal cancer tissue, and its relationship with tumorigenesis, tumor progression， and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer . MethodsThe expression of CLIC1 protein was detected in 150 cases of colorectal normal mucosa tissues, 62 cases of colorectal adenoma tissues, and 187 cases of colorectal cancer tissues by using immunohistochemistry tissue microarray, and the relationships between the expression of CLIC1 protein and clinicopathologic features, and the survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer were analyzed. ResultsThe positive rate of CLIC1 protein expression in normal mucosa tissues (26.00%, 39/150), colorectal adenoma tissues (66.13%, 41/62), and colorectal cancer tissues (82.89%, 187/155) increased in turn and the difference was statistically significant (Plt;0.001). The expression of CLIC1 protein was related to TNM staging (P=0.007), but it was not related to gender (P=0.553), age (P=0.206), tumor diameter (P=0.185), tumor differentiation (P=0.062), and tumor location (P=0.598). The median survival time after surgery in patients with CLIC1 protein positive expression was 80 months, and it was 111 months in patients with CLIC1 protein negative expression. The survival rate of patients with CLIC1 protein positive expression was lower than that with CLIC1 protein negative expression by log-rank test (66.40% vs. 80.00%, P=0.031). ConclusionsThe expression of CLIC1 protein is related to the tumorigenesis and progression of colorectal cancer as well as the survival of patients with colorectal cancer. CLIC1 is a potential tumor biomarker.
Objective To evaluate the results of operative treatment of acetabular fractures and to investigate its influence factors. Methods The cl inical data were analyzed retrospectively from 82 patients with acetabular fractures treated between September 2004 and June 2009. Of 82 patients, 65 were male and 17 were female, aged 26-72 years (mean, 38 years).Fractures were caused by traffic accident in 62 cases, by crush in 13 cases, and by fall ing from height in 7 cases. The time from injury to admission was 30 minutes to 12 days (median, 7.6 hours) in 70 cases, 12 cases were transferred because poor result after 34-67 days of conservative treatment. According to Judet classification, there were 24 cases of posterior wall fracture, 3 cases of posterior column fracture, 1 case of anterior wall fracture, 2 cases of anterior column fracture, 6 cases of transverse fracture, 16 cases of transverse and posterior wall fracture, 4 cases of posterior column and posterior wall fracture, 5 cases of T-type fracture, 3 cases of anterior and posterior hemitransverse fracture, and 18 cases of complete both-column fracture; 24 cases combined with dislocation of the hip. During operation, Kocher-Langenbeck approach was used in 49 cases, anterior il ioinguinal approach in 19 cases, and the combination of anterior and posterior approaches in 14 cases. Reconstructive plate (74 cases) and hollow lag screw (8 cases) internal fixation were used. The function of the hip was evaluated according to the modified Merled’Aubigne- Postel hip score system postoperatively. According to fracture type, age, lower extremity fracture before operation, qual ity of reduction, timing of surgery, hi p dislocation and time of reduction, operative approach, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and heterotopic ossification (HO), the patients were divided into the groups and the results were compared. Results Accordancewith the Matta X-ray evaluation criteria, anatomic reduction was achieved in 21 cases, good reduction in 37 cases, fair reduction in 16 cases, and poor reduction in 8 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 71%. All the cases were followed up 12-52 months mean, 34 months). Iatrogenic sciatic nerve injury occurred in 8 cases, infection in 3 cases, HO in 16 cases, DVT in 3 cases, hip posttraumatic arthritis in 12 cases, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head in 9 cases. X-ray examination showed that 80 cases achieved fracture union at 10-24 weeks after operation (mean, 14 weeks) and 2 cases had fracture delayed union at 10 months and 12 months after operation. According to the modified Merled’Aubigne-Postel hip score system, the function of the hip was rated as excellent in 26 cases, good in 32, fair in 20, and poor in 4 at 6 months after operation; the excellent and good rate was 71%. The affecting factors of cl inical results of acetabular fractures were fracture type, age, lower extremity fracture before operation, qual ity of reduction, timing of surgery, hip dislocation and time of reduction (P lt; 0.05). However the operative approach, DVT, and HO were not affecting factor of the acetabular fractures (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Operative treatment of acetabular fractures has a satisfying therapeutic effect. Fracture type, age, lower extremity fracture before operation, qual ity of reduction, timing of surgery, hip dislocation, and time of reduction are risk factors affecting postoperative results.