ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2016), WanFang Data, CBM, and CNKI were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis from inception to February 2016. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 17 RCTs involving 4 070 patients were included. The results of metaanalysis showed that: there were no significant differences in WOMAC pain scores (7 weeks: MD=-0.01, 95%CI -0.46 to 0.44, P=0.98; 13 weeks: MD=-0.01, 95%CI -0.46to 0.43, P=0.95; 26 weeks: MD=0.32, 95%CI -0.04 to 0.67, P=0.08), stiffness scores (7 weeks: MD=0.10, 95%CI -0.26 to 0.45, P=0.59; 13 weeks: MD=0.24, 95%CI -0.11 to 0.60, P=0.17; 26 weeks: MD=0.06, 95%CI -0.09 to 0.22, P=0.42), and life function scores (7 weeks: MD=-0.20, 95%CI -0.75to 0.36, P=0.49; 13 weeks: MD=-0.02, 95%CI -0.57 to 0.52, P=0.93; 26 weeks: MD=0.30, 95%CI -0.07 to 0.67, P=0.11) between the hyaluronic acid group and the control group in 7-, 13- and 26 weeks. However, the hyaluronic acid group was superior to the control group in 50-step test (MD=-0.49，95%CI -7.36 to -3.61，P<0.000 01). ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid has better effect than control treatment for pain at movement. However, due to the limited quantity of the included studies, the above conclusion still need to be verified by more high quality studies．
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic debridement versus non-operative treatment for degenerative meniscal tear. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2015), WanFang Data, CBM, and CNKI were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about arthroscopic debridement versus non-operative treatment for degenerative meniscal tear from inception to July 2015. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of nine RCTs involving 1 023 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:there were no significant differences between two groups at different follow-up time points in knee scoring scale (less than 6 months:SMD=0.12, 95%CI -0.11 to 0.35, P=0.30; 1 year:SMD=-0.03, 95%CI -0.18 to 0.11, P=0.65; 2 years:SMD=-0.07, 95%CI -0.32 to 0.19, P=0.61) and pain score (less than 6 months:MD=0.30, 95%CI -0.10 to 0.70, P=0.14; 1 year:MD=0.10, 95%CI -0.40 to 0.60, P=0.70; 2 years:MD=0.02, 95%CI -0.52 to 0.92, P=0.90). ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that arthroscopic debridement hasn't better effective than non-operative treatment for degenerative meniscal tear, however, due to the limited quantity of the included studies, the above conclusion still need more high quality research to be verified.