Recently, the frequency of lung disease appears higher and more precise than previously estimated. Small pulmonary nodules (SPNs) are frequently detected on high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans. For the reason of high rate of false positives by fine needle aspirate biopsy, small lung nodules often can not be confirmed by monitor or palpation with forceps. How to precisely locate and mark the nodule before the surgery is one of the most important things for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). We reviews the methods of location the pulmonary nodules before the surgery and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of various methods.
In response to the public health emergency and other urgent needs, World Health Organization (WHO) developed the concept and methodology of rapid advice guidelines (RAGs) in 2006. Compared with the standard guideline, striving to minimize the risk of bias, the RAG shortens the time to 1-3 months from more than 2 years. This study introduces the background, definition, application condition and performing methods of RAGs, and uses an example to clarify it, thus to provide a reference for the guideline development of public health emergency and other urgent need in China.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) guidelines, so as to provide evidence for developing similar guidelines. MethodsWe systematically searched TCM guidelines published in domestic medical journals from WanFang Data, VIP, CNKI and CBM. We also searched Google, Amazon.cn and dangdang.com by hand in order to obtain TCM guidelines published in monographs. And we used AGREE II instrument to assess the methodological quality of included guidelines. ResultsA total of 115 guidelines (87 published in domestic medical journals and 28 published in monographs) were included. Scaled domain percentages from highest to lowest were:scope and purpose (41%), stakeholder involvement (28%), clarity of presentation (33%), rigour of development (20%), editorial independence (9%) and applicability (7%). ConclusionThere is still a large gap about methodological quality between TCM guidelines and international guidelines. So the guideline developers should systematically search, evaluate and synthesize the evidence based on structured problems. At the same time, they also need to consider the costs of recommendations, the implementation environment and the patients' preference and values. On this basis, the developer could further increase the transparency and independence during developing TCM guidelines.
Currently there is no tool designed specifically to assess the risk of bias in the design, conduct or analysis of systematic reviews. ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews), which was developed lately, aims mainly to assess the risk of bias in the conduct and result interpretation of systematic reviews relating to interventions, etiology, diagnosis and prognosis, as well as the relevance of the systematic review questions and the practice questions that their users want to address. This paper aims to introduce the ROBIS tool to Chinese systematic review developers, guideline developers and other researchers to promote the comprehension of it and its application, so as to improve the quality of systematic reviews in China.
With the perspective of evidence-based medicine, this review aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of off-label drug use of bevacizumab for eye disease, and explore the barriers to further study. And then, suggestions for the supported evidence and clinical use of off-label drug use will be provided based on this case.
ObjectiveTo interpret ROBIS, a new tool to evaluate the risk of bias in systematic reviews, to promote the comprehension of it and its proper application. MethodsWe explained each item of ROBIS tool, used it to evaluate the risk of bias of a selected intervention review whose title was Cyclophosphamide for Primary Nephrotic Syndrome of Children: A Systematic Review, and judged the risk of bias in the review. ResultsThe selected systematic review as a whole was rated as “high risk of bias”, because there existed high risk of bias in domain 2 to 4, namely identification and selection of studies, data collection and study appraisal, synthesis and findings. The risk of bias in domain 1 (study eligibility criteria) was low. The relevance of identified studies and the review’s research question was appropriately considered and the reviewers avoided emphasizing results on the basis of their statistical significance. ConclusionROBIS is a new tool worthy of being recommended to evaluate risk of bias in systematic reviews. Reviewers should use ROBIS items as standards to conduct and produce high quality systematic reviews.
The methodology of conducting systematic review of prognostic studies has received a great deal of interest in recent years. Using GRADE for systematic review of prognostic studies, five aspects should be considered:risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision and publication bias. The methods of using GRADE system in systematic review of prognostic studies are similar to systematic review of interventional studies, meanwhile, there are differences. Not only the uniqueness of prognostic study but also the repeating downgrade should be taken into consideration in the GRADE process. Applying GRADE to systematic review of prognostic studies would be widely accepted along with the methodology development and quality improvement of systematic review of prognostic studies.
The biggest advantages of network meta-analysis (NMA) are to compare the effectiveness of different interventions about one conditions using a quantitative way, pool the results of direct comparison and indirect comparison, and rank the effectiveness based on outcomes, so as to select the best decision for patients. In the paper we introduce the methods of applying GRADE system to NMAs based on the papers published by GRADE working group and other relative studies. The steps of using GRADE to NMAs are mainly based on four aspects: firstly, presenting direct and indirect effect estimates and 95% CI; secondly, rating of quality of direct and indirect estimates; thirdly, presenting the results of NMAs; and the last step is to rating the quality of NMA effect estimates. The methods of rating the quality of direct comparison are the same to use GRADE in traditional meta-analysis. The rating of the quality of the indirect estimates is based on the ratings of the two pairwise estimates that contributes to the indirect estimate of the comparison of interest. The lower confidence rating of the two direct comparisons constitutes the confidence rating of the indirect comparison. When both direct and indirect evidence are available, we suggest using the higher of the two quality ratings as the quality rating for NMA estimate. The four steps of rating the quality of NMA from GRADE working group have promoted the theoretical system of NMA. But the process requires the evaluators to be familiar with GRADE system, and conduct pilot test to make sure the evaluators had understood the items of GRADE system correctly. In addition, we also need to concern that the non-transitivity among different groups and the inconsistency between direct comparison and indirect comparison.
In order to help Chinese guideline developers, clinicians, health policy makers and other relevant researchers fully understand and make appropriate use of World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, Chinese GRADE Center and Guidelines Review Committee of World Health Organization (WHO-GRC) have written a series of papers about development methods, review principles and the structure and content of WHO guidelines. This is the third (also last) paper which interpreted Consolidated Guidelines on the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection and Guidelines for the Screening, Care and Treatment of Persons with Hepatitis C Infection as examples with the process and steps of WHO guideline development.
In order to help Chinese guideline developers, clinicians, health policy makers and other relevant researchers fully understand and make appropriate use of World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, Chinese GRADE Center and Guidelines Review Committee of World Health Organization (WHO-GRC) have written a series of papers about development methods, review principles and the structure and content of WHO guidelines. This is the second paper of this series introducing the composition, main work and functions of WHO-GRC.