Objective To compare the effectiveness between the myo-periosteal fibular bone bridging and traditional transtibial amputation in the treatment of amputation below knee so as to provide theoretical basis for choosing transtibial amputation in clinical application. Methods Between November 2001 and November 2011, 38 patients with mangled lower extremity were treated by transtibial amputation. Among 38 patients, 17 (group A) underwent myo-periosteal fibular bone bridging (the operation techniques of an attached peroneal muscle myo-periosteal fibular strut bridge between the end of the tibia and fibula below knee amputation), and other 21 (group B) underwent traditional transtibial amputation. There was no significant difference in age, gender, injury cause, amputation cause, side, and disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The quality of life (QOL) was analyzed using 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), and prosthesis satisfaction by Trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scale (TAPES). Results Healing of incision by first intention was obtained in all patients of 2 groups; no necrosis, infection, or poor stumps was observed. The mean follow-up time was 22 months (range, 14-30 months) in group A, and 26 months (range, 15-30 months) in group B. The patients achieved good healing of bone bridging, no bone nonunion occurred. The healing time was (5.1 ± 1.1) months in group A and (3.3 ± 0.6) months in group B, showing significant difference between 2 groups (t=9.82, P=0.00). Spur occurred at the distal fibula in an 11-year-old boy of group B after 2 years of operation, which blocked use of prosthesis; prosthesis was well used in the other patients. After 12 months of operation, SF-36 score was 55.84 ± 14.01 in group A and 49.93 ± 12.78 in group B, showing significant difference (P lt; 0. 05); the physical functioning, social functioning, role-physical, vitality, body pain, general health scores in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found in role-emotional and mental health scores between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). TAPES score was 12.12 ± 2.23 in group A and 10.10 ± 2.00 in group B, showing significant difference (t=2.891, P=0.006). Conclusion It is a very effective method to treat traumatic amputation using an attached myo-periosteal fibular bone bridging between the end of the tibia and fibula below knee, which can afford better quality of life and prosthesis satisfaction.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of HoloSight Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery Robot-assisted infra-acetabular screw placement for treatment of acetabular fractures. Methods The clinical data of 23 patients with acetabular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation and infra-acetabular screw placement in two medical centers between June 2022 and October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the the method of infra-acetabular screw placement, the patients were divided into navigation group (10 cases, using HoloSight Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery Robot-assisted screw placement) and freehand group (13 cases, using traditional X-ray fluoroscopy to guide screw placement). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, and Judet-Letournel classification between the two groups (P>0.05). The time of infra-acetabular screw placement, the fluoroscopy frequency, the guide pin adjustment times, the quality of screw placement, the quality of fracture reduction, and the function of hip joint were compared between the two groups. ResultsAll patients completed the operation successfully. The time of screw placement, the fluoroscopy frequency, and guide pin adjustment times in the navigation group were significantly less than those in the freehand group (P<0.05). The quality of screw placement in the navigation group was significantly better than that in the freehand group (P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 6-11 months, with an average of 7.7 months. There were 9 and 9 cases in the navigation group and the freehand group who achieved excellent and good fracture reduction quality at 1 week after operation, and 12 and 12 cases with excellent and good hip joint function at last follow-up, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The fractures in both groups healed well, and there was no significant difference in healing time (P>0.05). During the follow-up, there was no complication related to screw placement, such as failure of internal fixation, vascular and nerve injury, incisional hernia. ConclusionIn the treatment of acetabular fractures, compared with the traditional freehand screw placement, the HoloSight Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery Robot-assisted screw placement can reduce the time of screw placement, improve the accuracy of screw placement, and reduce the amount of radiation, which is an efficient, accurate, and safe surgical method.
Objective To explore the application value and effectiveness of pelvic unlocking closed reduction device for the treatment of unstable pelvic posterior ring disruption. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 243 cases of unstable pelvic posterior ring disruption treated with pelvic unlocking closed reduction device in 13 orthopaedic trauma centers across the country between December 2018 and June 2020 was performed. There were 139 males and 104 females; the age ranged from 18 to 92 years, with an average age of 48.5 years. The cause of injury included 132 cases of traffic accident injuries, 102 cases of falling from height, and 9 cases of crushing injuries. According to AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, there were 5 cases of type 61-B1, 13 cases of type 61-B2, 32 cases of type 61-C1.1, 47 cases of type 61-C1.2, 89 cases of type 61-C1.3, 35 cases of type 61-C2, and 22 cases of type 61-C3. The time from injury to operation was 2-121 days, with a median of 10 days. Preoperative preparation time, installation time of unlocking closed reduction device, fracture reduction time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, intraoperative blood loss, and surgical complications were recorded, and Matta scoring standard was used to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction. According to Matta evaluation results, the patients were divided into two subgroups: excellent-good group and fair-poor group. The differences in gender, age, time from injury to operation, AO/OTA classification, and perioperative clinical indicators were compared between the two groups, and the effects of baseline data and perioperative indicators on the quality of fracture reduction were studied. Results Pelvic unlocking closed reduction device did not interfere with the display of the pelvic structure and fracture displacement direction during the intraoperative fluoroscopy, effectively correcting the displacement of the pelvic ring. The preoperative preparation time was 17-60 minutes, with an average of 30 minutes; installation time of unlocking closed reduction device was 10-32 minutes, with an average of 21 minutes; intraoperative fracture reduction time was 15-205 minutes, with an average of 49.2 minutes; intraoperative fluoroscopy times were 41-420 times, with an average of 132 times; intraoperative blood loss was 40-1 500 mL, with an average of 71.5 mL. The reduction quality of pelvic fracture was evaluated according to Matta score immediately after operation. The results were excellent in 153 cases, good in 61 cases, fair in 24 cases, and poor in 5 cases. The excellent and good rate was 88.1%. Further subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in other indexes (P>0.05) between the excellent-good group and the fair-poor group except for the time from injury to operation and AO/OTA classification (P<0.05). Among them, the excellent-good reduction rate was 92.2% (119/129) in patients with injury-to-operation time less than 10 days, and the fair-poor reduction rate was 25.7% (9/35) and 40.9% (9/22) in patients with AO/OTA 61-C2 and 61-C3 types, respectively. There was no surgery-related complication due to the application of the pelvic unlocked reduction device, no secondary iliac fractures, vascular, or nerve injuries, and postoperative CT showed that all channel screws were located in the osseous channel. ConclusionThe pelvic unlocking reduction device can effectively help to reduce the unstable pelvic posterior ring and maintain reduction, meet the needs of different projection angles of pelvic fracture with intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy. The system facilitate the operation of pelvic reduction and precise fixation.