Objective To discuss the safety, feasibility and advantages of tubeless trans-subxiphoid thoracoscopic surgery in anterior mediastinal tumor resection. Methods A total of 32 patients suffering anterior mediastinal tumor were enrolled, including 17 patients (8 males and 9 females) with average age of 31.8±8.4 years who had been performed tubeless trans-subxipohoid tharcoscopic surgery and 15 patients (8 males and 7 females) with average age of 31.1±9.2 years who had been performed traditional trans-subxipohoid tharcoscopic surgery. The differences of surgical duration, the lowest intraoperative arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), postoperative awaking time, postoperative pain visual analogue score (VAS), postoperative pulmonary recruitment time, duration of postoperative hospital stay and hospitalization cost were analyzed. Results Postoperative awaking time (18.5±1.8 min vs. 28.9±4.2 min, P=0.000), postoperative VAS (1.6±0.6 vs. 3.5±7.4, P=0.000), duration of postoperative hospital stay (2.5±7.2 d vs. 4.3±1.1 d, P=0.000) and hospitalization cost (3.2±1.1 ten thousand RMB vs. 4.9±1.1 10 ten thousand RMB, P=0.000) in the tubeless group were better than those in the control group. There was no significant difference in surgical duration (51.7±6.5 min vs. 55.1±8.5 min), the lowest intraoperative SaO2 (98.5%±0.9% vs. 98.1%±0.8%), postoperative pulmonary recruitment time (33.9±12.2 d vs. 38.4±15.2 d, P>0.05) between the two groups.Conclusion Tubeless trans-subxiphoid thoracoscopic surgery is safe, feasible and advanced in anterior mediastinal tumor resection.
ObjectiveTo explore the safety, feasibility and superiority of tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopy in the treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis (PPH).MethodsThe clinical data of 46 patients with palmar hyperhidrosis treated by thoracoscopy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from March 2017 to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 22 received tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and were divided into a tubeless group, including 10 males and 12 females with an average age of 24.3±6.4 years; 24 received conventional thoracoscopic surgery, and were divided into a control group, including 13 males and 11 females with an average age of 23.5±4.8 years. The operation status, anesthesia effect and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared.ResultsForty-six patients successfully completed the operation with the assistance of thoracoscopy. There was no intraoperative transfer to thoracotomy, or intraoperative transfer to tracheal intubation in the tubeless group. Anesthetic recovery time (14.4±1.6 min vs. 20.1±1.8 min, P=0.000), time to get out of bed on the first postoperative day (3.1±0.6 h vs. 1.6±0.4 h, P=0.000), visual analogue score for postoperative pain (1.4±0.6 points vs. 3.4±1.1 points, P=0.000), postoperative hospital stay (1.7±0.5 d vs. 2.8±0.6 d, P=0.000), postoperative satisfaction rate of patients (95.5% vs. 66.7%, P=0.037) in the tubeless group were shorter or better than those in the control group. There was no statistical difference in age, gender, smoking history, palmar hyperhidrosis classification, palms or other associated parts, the total time of bilateral surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, or compensatory hyperhidrosis (mild) between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with traditional thoracoscopic surgery for PPH, tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for PPH has the advantages of safety, reliability, light pain and quick recovery, in line with the concept of accelerated rehabilitation surgery.
ObjectiveTo explore the possible factors which influence the survival time of elderly patients with esophageal cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with esophageal cancer treated in the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Gansu Province Tumor Hospital from January 2012 to October 2016. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate and analyze the single factor, survival curve with log-rank test. The Cox regression model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis．ResultsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 302 patients were eventually collected, including 231 males and 71 females, with an average age of 66.0±6.0 years. The univariate analysis showed that age, tumor stage, tumor site, Karnosfsky performance satus (KPS) score, and treatment were prognostic factors (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the patient age and treatment were independent factors for overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS) (P<0.05). The OS and PFS of the patients with age≤70 years were better than those of the patients more than 70 years. Chemotherapy alone and surgery alone was better for survival situation than radiotherapy alone.ConclusionAge and treatment are independent prognostic factors in survival time of the elderly patients with esophageal cancer.