west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "ZENGYi" 3 results
  • Efficacy of Dezocine for Atrial Fibrillation Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

    ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of dezocine used for atrial fibrillation radiofrequency catheter ablation. MethodsForty-five patients who would undergo radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation were randomly chosen to be our study subjects between April and July 2013. According to the randomized and double-blind principle, they were divided into group D (dezocine group) and group M (morphine group). During routine visits prior to surgery, we recorded the patients' vital signs, pain score and degree of comfort. Before the ablation procedure, 5 mg dezocine or 5 mg morphine was administered intravenously for patients in both the two groups. During the procedure, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, electrocardiogram, pain scores, and comfort score of the patients were monitored. Furthermore, 2-3 mg dezocine or morphine were administered intravenously if additional analgesia was needed. The time of the procedure was recorded. The patients were followed up and evaluated 2, 6 h and 24 hours after the procedure. ResultsThe procedure time, pain rating index, and visual analogue scores were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Adverse reaction during or after the procedure was not significantly different (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe analgesic effect of dezocine is better than morphine for atrial fibrillation radiofrequency catheter ablation. The incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting is still high. Dezocine for analgesia in atrial fibrillation ablation can be used as an ideal alternative instead of general anesthesia.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Follow-up Study on Allogeneic Nonvascularized Fibular Grafting in Treating Patients with Different Femoral Head Necrotic Area

    ObjectiveTo study the clinical efficacy of core decompression and allogeneic nonvascularized fibular grafting on patients with different femoral head necrotic area. MethodsBetween January 2010 and December 2011, 59 hips in 59 patients with Ficat stage Ⅱ osteonecrosis of femoral head were treated with core decompression and allogeneic nonvascularized fibular grafting. Fifty-four patients (54 hips) were followed up. According to the necrotic area of femoral head, patients were divided into three groups: 6 hips in type A, 37 hips in type B and 11 hips in type C. We analyzed the outcomes by changes in radiographic images, Harris hip scores, hip activity and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. The mean follow-up time was 40.1 months. ResultsThe postoperative X-ray images were good with no fibula prolapse, fracture or infection. Six femoral heads collapsed in patients of type C group. No head collapsed in patients grouped into type A or type B. The three groups' Harris hip scores were better than those before surgery (P<0.05). But the Harris hip score of patients with femoral head collapse was as bad as that before surgery (P>0.05). The Harris score of group C was significantly lower than group A and B (P<0.01). The joint movements of type A and type B patients were similar with those before surgery, and the VAS pain score was lower. But patients of type C suffered worse joint movement and the pain was not relieved. ConclusionThe clinical efficacy of femoral head necrotic patients treated with core decompression and allogeneic nonvascularized fibular grafting is generally good. But the risk of femoral head collapse in type C patients is high, and the clinic outcome is worse than patients of type A and B. Therefore this type of surgery is more suitable for patients with type A and B femoral head necrotic area.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • EFFICACY OF SEQUENTIAL TREATMENT WITH ADDUCTOR CANAL NERVE BLOCK AND CYCLOOXYGENASE 2 SELECTIVE INHIBITOR AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

    ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of sequential treatment with adductor canal nerve block (ACNB) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) selective inhibitor (parecoxib and celecoxib) after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsBetween January 2015 and December 2015, 90 osteoarthritis patients who met the inclusion criteria were treated, and randomly divided into 3 groups:ACNB+COX-2 group (group A, n=30), COX-2 group (group B, n=30), and control group (group C, n=30). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, side, and osteoarthritis duration between groups (P > 0.05), and the data were comparable. ACNB was used in group A at the end of TKA. Intravenous injection of parecoxib (40 mg per 12 hours) was administrated at the first three postoperative days, and followed by oral celecoxib (200 mg per 12 hours) until 6 weeks after operation in groups A and B; while placebo was given at the same time point in group C. Oral tramadol or intravenous morphine, as remedial measures, were introduced when patients had a visual analogue scale (VAS) score more than 4. The following indicators were compared between groups:the operative time, drainage volume at 24 hours after operation, length of hospital stay, and incidence of side effect; VAS pain scores, morphine consumption, range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint, and inflammatory cytokines levels at pre-operation and at 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after operation; morphine consumption within first 24 hours and at 24 hours to 6 weeks after operation; the American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after operation; and the serum coagulation parameters at pre-operation, and at 1, 3, and 14 days after operation. ResultsThe length of hospital stay was significantly shorter and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in groups A and B than group C (P < 0.05). The VAS scores at rest (VASR) of groups A and B were significantly lower than that of group C at 1, 2, and 3 days after operation (P < 0.05); difference in the VAS scores at walking (VASW) was significant between groups at 1 day after operation (P < 0.05), and group A had the lowest VASW; and the VASW of groups A and B were significantly lower than that of group C at 2 and 3 days and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after operation (P < 0.05). The difference in morphine consumption was significant between groups within the first 24 hours after operation (P < 0.05), and group A exhibited the lowest consumption; and the morphine consumption in groups A and B was significantly lower than that in group C at 24 hours to 6 weeks after operation (P < 0.05). Significant difference was found in HSS scores between groups at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after operation, and group A showed the highest score (P < 0.05). At 1 and 2 days after operation, group A showed the highest ROM (P < 0.05), and ROM of groups A and B was significantly higher that of group C at 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after operation (P < 0.05). Groups A and B were significantly lower than group C in the serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate at 2 days, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks, in C-reactive protein levels at 1, 2, and 3 days, in interleukin 6 (IL-6) and TNF-α levels at 1 day to 6 weeks, and in IL-8 level at 2 and 3 days (P < 0.05). The drainage volume within the first 24 hours and the serum coagulation parameters within the 2 weeks after operation showed no significant difference between groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionSequential treatment with ACNB and COX-2 selective inhibitor is a safe and effective approach for postoperative pain management after primary TKA, and it can alleviate postoperative pain, promote the joint function recovery, and reduce the risk of adverse reactions.

    Release date:2016-10-02 04:55 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content