Objective To compare the clinical results of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) during 10 years follow-up so as to provide a reference for clinical selection of TKA prosthesis. Methods Between January 2002 and December 2005, 113 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint underwent primary TKA, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Mobile-bearing prosthesis was used in 47 cases (group A) and fixed-bearing prosthesis in 66 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, varus and flexion deformity of the knee, range of motion (ROM) of the knee, knee society score (KSS), and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) between 2 groups before operation (P>0.05), so the data were comparable. Results The operation time of groups A and B was (88.1±6.5) and (90.3±7.2) minutes respectively, showing no significant difference (t=1.666,P=0.099). The wounds healed by first intention in all patients of both groups, and no postoperative early complications of incision infection and deep venous thrombosis occurred. The follow-up time was 10.2-12.3 years (mean, 10.8 years) in group A, and was 10.2-12.6 years (mean, 11.3 years) in group B. Revision was performed in 3 cases of group A and 4 cases of group B; the survival rates of prosthesis were 93.6% and 93.9% in groups A and B respectively, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.005,P=0.944). The postoperative knee ROM, KSS score, and WOMAC score were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). The knee ROM and KSS score of group B were significantly better than those of group A at 6 weeks after operation (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups at 1, 3, and 10 years after operation (P>0.05). The WOMAC score of group A was significantly better than that of group B at 10 years after operation (t=2.086,P=0.037), but no significant difference was shown at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 3 years after operation (P>0.05). At 10 years after operation, the excellent and good rate of KSS score was 87.2% in group A and was 84.8% in group B, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.018,P=0.893). Conclusion Good medium- and long-term clinical results can be achieved in TKA with both mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing prostheses. The TKA with fixed-bearing prosthesis is relatively simple with better early effectiveness of rehabilitation; and the TKA with mobile-bearing prosthesis could provide better long-term degree of satisfaction in WOMAC score, but a higher surgical skill and soft tissue balance techniques are needed.
Objective To compare the early effectiveness between by anterior approach via Bikini incision and by OCM approach in the primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Between June 2015 and March 2016, 60 patients with ischemic necrosis of the femoral head who accorded with the inclusion criteria were chosen in the study, who were divided into 2 groups according to different surgical approaches. THA was performed on 30 patients by anterior approach via Bikini incision (group A), and on 30 patients by OCM approach (group B). There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, side of affected hip, Steinberg stage of ischemic necrosis of femoral head, preoperative hemoglobin, preoperative Harris score, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, starting time of straight leg raising exercise, starting time of active abduction of hip, hospitalization time, the incidence of limb length discrepancy, postoperative Harris score and VAS score were recorded and compared between 2 groups. Anteroposterior pelvic X-ray films were taken to measure acetabular abduction and acetabular anteversion. Results Primary healing of incision was obtained in all patients of 2 groups, and there was no significant difference in complication between 2 groups (χ2=0.144,P=0.704). All the patients of 2 groups were followed up 3 to 12 months, averaged 6 months. There was no significant difference in operation time, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, hospitalization time, and starting time of straight leg raising exercise between 2 groups (P>0.05). Group A was significantly shorter than group B in starting time of active abduction of hip (t=–4.591,P=0.000), and was significantly lower than group B in the incidence of limb length discrepancy (χ2=5.455,P=0.020). After operation, neither Harris score at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months nor VSA score at 24 hours and 6 weeks showed significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). The anteroposterior pelvic X-ray films showed that all the prostheses were in good position, and there was no femoral prosthesis subsidence, acetabular cup displacement or dislocation. No significant difference was found in acetabular abduction and acetabular anteversion at 2 days after operation between 2 groups (t=0.887,P=0.379;t=0.652,P=0.517). Conclusion Both of two approaches in THA can avoid muscle damage and achieve favorable short-term effectiveness. But, anterior approach via Bikini incision is superior to OCM approach in starting time of active abduction of hip and the incidence of limb length discrepancy.