ObjectiveTo investigate effect of posterior oblique ligament (POL) repair on the rotational stability of the knee joint for the medial collateral ligament (MCL) combined with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures.MethodsThe clinical data of 50 patients (50 knees) with grade-3 MCL-ACL combined injuries who met the selection criteria between January 2013 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All ACLs were reconstructed with autogenous tendon and the superficial and deep layers of MCLs were sutured; then, POLs were also sutured in 25 patients of repair group and only received conservation treatment postoperatively in 25 patients of conservation group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, and preoperative KT-1000 measuring, medial joint space opening, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and knee range of motion between the two groups (P>0.05).ResultsAll incisions of the two groups healed by first intention, no surgical related complications occurred. All patients were followed up, with follow-up time of 28-56 months (mean, 38.1 months) in repair group and 26-55 months (mean, 29.1 months) in conservation group. At last follow-up, the IKDC score, VAS score, KT-1000 measuring, medial joint space opening, and knee range of motion significantly improved in the two groups when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05); but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The Slocum test showed that there was no instability of the anterior medial rotation in the two groups.ConclusionThe POL repair can’t obtain more medial stability after ACL reconstruction and MCL repair (superficial and deep layers) for patients who have MCL-ACL combined injuries.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bidirectional barbed suture.MethodsBetween February 2014 and January 2016, 96 patients (96 knees) with ACL injury who met the inclusion criteria were recruited and randomly divided into 2 groups (n=48). All patients underwent ACL reconstruction with autologous tendon. The tibial remnant was fixed with PDS-Ⅱ suture (control group) and bidirectional barbed suture (trial group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, injury side, the interval from injury to operation, and preoperative knee stability (KT-1000 test), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Lysholm score (P>0.05). The knee stability (KT-1000 test), IKDC score, Lysholm score, proprioception, and Cyclops lesion after operation were recorded.ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention in both groups. Forty-four patients in control group were followed up 26-47 months (mean, 36.6 months), and 45 patients in trial group were followed up 26-48 months (mean, 35.6 months). At last follow-up, the IKDC score, Lysholm score, and KT-1000 test were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in both groups (P<0.05); but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in proprioception between 2 groups at 1 and 2 years after operation, and between 1 year after operation and 2 years after operation (P>0.05) in the same group. The incidences of Cyclops lesion at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after operation were 0, 4.44% (2/45), and 4.44% (2/45) in trial group, and 13.6% (6/44), 13.6% (6/44), 20.5% (9/44) in control group, showing significant differences between 2 groups at 6 months and at 2 years after operation (P=0.012; P=0.022) and no significant difference at 1 year after operation (P=0.157).ConclusionThe remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction with bidirectional barbed suture can decrease the incidence of Cyclops lesions. However, this technique can not improve the effectiveness in terms of the clinical function and stability compared with the traditional technique.
ObjectiveTo compare the strength difference between the interfacial screw and the interfacial screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology to fix the tibial end of ligament during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction through the biomechanical test.MethodsTwenty fresh frozen pig tibia were randomly divided into two groups (n=10) to prepare ACL reconstruction models. The graft tendons in the experimental group were fixed with interfacial screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology, and the graft tendons in the control group were fixed with interfacial screw. The two groups of specimens were fixed in the high-frequency dynamic mechanics test system M-3000, and the length change (displacement), ultimate load, and stiffness of graft tendons were measured through the reciprocating test and load-failure test.ResultsThe results of reciprocating test showed that the displacement of the experimental group was (3.06±0.58) mm, and that of the control group was (2.82±0.46) mm, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.641, P=0.529). The load-failure test results showed that the stiffness of the experimental group and the control group were (95.39±13.63) and (91.38±14.28) N/mm, respectively, with no significant difference (t=1.021, P=0.321). The ultimate load of the experimental group was (743.15±173.96) N, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (574.70±74.43) N (t=2.648, P=0.016).ConclusionIn ACL reconstruction, the fixation strength of tibial end with interface screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology is obviously better than that of interface screw alone.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of transosseous suture in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) double bundle reconstruction. Methods The clinical data of 75 patients with recurrent patella dislocation who met the selection criteria between January 2014 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All of them were treated with MPFL double bundle reconstruction, and divided into study group (39 cases, using new transosseous suture technique) and control group (36 cases, using traditional suture anchor fixation) depending on the intraoperative fixation technique. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, affected knee side, preoperative tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, Insall-Salvati ratio, knee range of motion, Kujala score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, congruence angle, and tilt angle between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Kujala score, IKDC score, and knee range of motion were used to evaluate the functional improvement of patients before and after operation. The congruence angle and tilt angle were measured on X-ray films. Results There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 24-36 months, with an average of 29.4 months. There was no complication such as incision infection, fat liquefaction, patellar redislocation, and prepatellar pain during follow-up. At last follow-up, the Kujala score, IKDC score, knee range of motion, congruence angle, and tilt angle of two groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe application of suture anchor or transosseous suture to complete MPFL double bundle reconstruction can restore patellar stability, and there is no significant difference in the short-term effectiveness between them.