west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "ZHANG Jingyu" 3 results
  • Hemodynamics Responses to Epinephrine and Lidocaine in Craniotomy Patients

    目的 观察不同浓度肾上腺素与利多卡因混合液头皮浸润注射对开颅术患者血流动力学的影响。方法 选取2010年5月-10月80例颅内肿瘤患者,随机分成4组,行1%利多卡因溶液混合不同浓度的肾上腺素16 mL头皮浸润注射。肾上腺素浓度:A组2.5 μg/mL、B组5.0 μg/mL、C组7.5 μg/mL、D组10.0 μg/mL。记录注射前(T0)、注射后5 min内(T1-10)心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP),根据各时段的MAP最低值和最高值,计算MAP的降低率和升高率,计数各组MAP下降10%以内、10%~20%和20%以上的例数。 结果 C组的MAP下降例数最多且MAP下降率最高,与其他组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。组内比较,C组MAP、SBP在1.5、2.0、2.5 min时、DBP在2 min时和D组MAP和DBP在1.5、2.0 min时下降差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。4组血压下降的同时伴HR增快,但HR组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 低浓度的肾上腺素与10%利多卡因混合液用于开颅术患者头皮浸润注射时可导致血压下降。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Research progress of cementless intercalary prosthesis stem

    ObjectiveTo review the research progress of cementless intercalary prosthesis stem. MethodsThe literature about the cementless intercalary prosthesis in treatment of bone defects of extremities was reviewed, and the designing and application of prosthesis stem were analyzed. ResultsCementless intercalary prosthesis has the advantages of good biocompatibility. However, there are also some disadvantages, including the multiple factors affecting the fixation of the prosthesis stem and individual differences in the stability of the prosthesis. The methods to improve the fixation stability of prosthesis stem mainly include the optimization of prosthesis stem shape, addition of auxiliary fixation, and improvement of coating materials on the stem surface as well as porous structure of the stem surface. Among these methods, augment with auxiliary fixation has the most satisfactory effect on improving the stability of prosthesis. However, the deficiency of the method is the increasing risk of the larger incision exposure and surgical trauma. ConclusionImproving the design and fixation method of the cementless intercalary prosthesis stem can further improve the stability of the prosthesis. Under the premise of avoiding increasing surgical trauma as much as possible, addition of the auxiliary fixation can be a feasible choice to improve the fixation stability of prosthesis.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Biomechanical evaluation of effects of percutaneous cement discoplasty and percutaneous cement interbody fusion on spinal stability

    Objective To investigate the effects of percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD) and percutaneous cement interbody fusion (PCIF) on spinal stability by in vitro biomechanical tests. Methods Biomechanical test was divided into intact (INT) group, percutaneous lumbar discectomy (PLD) group, PCD group, and PCIF group. Six specimens of L4, 5 (including vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs) from fresh male cadavers were taken to prepare PLD, PCD, and PCIF specimens, respectively. Before treatment and after the above treatments, the MTS multi-degree-of-freedom simulation test system was used to conduct the biomechanical test. The intervertebral height of the specimen was measured before and after the axial loading of 300 N, and the difference was calculated. The range of motion (ROM) and stiffness of the spine in flexion, extension, left/right bending, and left/right rotation under a torque of 7.5 Nm were calculated. Results After axial loading, the change of intervertebral height in PLD group was more significant than that in other three groups (P<0.05). Compared with INT group, the ROM in all directions significantly increased and the stiffness significantly decreased in PLD group (P<0.05). Compared with INT group, the ROM of flexion, extension, and left/right rotation in PCD group significantly increased and the stiffness significantly decreased (P<0.05); compared with PLD group, the ROM of flexion, extension, and left/right bending in PCD group significantly decreased and the stiffness significantly increased (P<0.05). Compared with INT group, ROM of left/right bending in PCIF group significantly decreased and stiffness significantly increased (P<0.05); compared with PLD group, the ROM in all directions significantly decreased and the stiffness significantly increased (P<0.05); compared with PCD group, the ROM of flexion, left/right bending, and left/right rotation significantly decreased and stiffness significantly increased (P<0.05). Conclusion Both PCD and PCIF can provide good biomechanical stability. The former mainly affects the stiffness in flexion, extension, and bending, while the latter is more restrictive on lumbar ROM in all directions, especially in bending and rotation.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content