【摘要】 目的 研究过氧化酶增殖因子活化受体γ（peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma， PPARγ）和血管内皮生长因子C（vascular endothelial growth factor C， VEGF-C）在胃癌组织中表达的相关性，分析其表达与临床病理因素之间的关系。 方法 2005年3月-2009年3月间采用逆转录-聚合酶链反应方法检测36例胃癌手术标本中PPARγ和VEGF-C mRNA的表达，同时选取相同患者的胃正常组织作为对照。 结果 PPARγ mRNA在胃癌中的表达量高于癌旁正常组织，两者的差异有统计学意义（P=0.007）；VEGF-C在胃癌中的表达量高于癌旁正常组织，两者的差异有统计学意义（P=0.004）；PPARγ的表达与VEGF-C表达无关联性（r=0.135，P=0.414）；PPARγ表达与胃癌组织中浸润程度有关（χ2=4.620，P=0.032）、淋巴结转移有关（χ2=15.753，P=0.000）和临床病理分期有关（χ2=4.610，P=0.032）；VEGF-C表达与胃癌组织中淋巴结转移有关（χ2=4.729，P=0.030）、远处转移有关（χ2=4.064，P=0.044）和临床病理分期有关（χ2=6.300，P=0.012）。 结论 PPARγ和VEGF-C可能在胃癌新生淋巴管形成中起重要作用，两者的表达水平与胃癌患者的病情判断及预后评价密切相关。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the significance of expressions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) in gastric carcinoma as well as their correlation, and to study the relationship between the expressions and clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric carcinoma. Methods Thirty-six pairs of normal mucosa and cancer specimens were obtained from patients who had undergone gastric operation for primary gastric carcinoma and subjected to reverse transcription-ploymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for PPARγ and VEGF-C mRNA detection. Results The positive rate and level of PPARγ mRNA expression were higher in gastric cancer tissues than those in normal gastric mucosa (P=0.007). The positive rate and level of VEGF-C mRNA expression were also higher in gastric cancer tissues than those in normal gastric mucosa (P=0.004). Simultaneously, the expression of PPARγ was not correlated with that of VEGF-C (r=0.135, P=0.414), while the highly productions of PPARγ and VEGF-C in gastric carcinomas were both associated with the lymph node metastasis and the clinical stage (Plt;0.05). Conclusion PPARγ and VEGF-C may play an important role in the lymphangio-genesis of gastric cancer, and united detection of PPARγ and VEGF-C expressions may be correlated with making diagnosis, evaluating prognosis in patients with gastric cancer at the same time.
ObjectiveTo assess the methodological quality of guidelines for bronchoscopic alveolar lavage. MethodsCNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, CBM, Web of Science, PubMed, EMbase databases and medlive.cn, the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), the National Guideline International Network (GIN), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE), and the World Health Organization (WHO) websites were electronically searched to collect guidelines of bronchoscopic alveolar lavage from inception to December 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the guidelines by using AGREE Ⅱ tool. ResultsA total of 19 guidelines were included, with 5 from China, 5 from the USA, 3 from Europe, 2 from the UK, 1 from Australia, 1 from Israel, 1 from Spain, and 1 from India. The average standard score rates of the 19 guidelines in the six fields were 50.73% for scope and purpose, 20.02% for participants, 15.13% for formulation rigor, 36.40% for clarity of presentation, 3.51% for applicability, and 22.37% for editorial independence.ConclusionsThe quality of bronchoalveolar lavage guidelines remains relatively low.