Objective To review the research on different surgical approaches and MRI evaluation of total hip arthroplasty (THA), to clarify the possible muscle damage caused by different approaches, and to help clinicians avoid intraoperative muscle damage and identify the causes of certain muscle-related complications after operation. MethodsThe research literature on different surgical approaches and MRI evaluation of THA at home and abroad was extensively reviewed to summarize the MRI performance of the posterior approach, modified direct lateral approach, direct anterior approach, and minimally invasive anterolateral approach (also called Orthopadische Chirurgie Munchen approach). Results The traditional posterior approach mainly damages the short external rotator muscle group and increases the incidence of postoperative dislocation; the piriformis-keeping posterior approach significantly improves the quality of the pyriformis tendon in the postoperative period, but it may lead to damage to the intrapelvic portion of the piriformis muscle. The modified direct lateral approach mainly damages the gluteus medius muscle, which increases the risk of postoperative claudication. The direct anterior approach mainly damages the vastus tensoris muscle and may result in damage to the short external rotator muscle group and the muscles around the incision. The minimally invasive anterolateral approach primarily damages the superior gluteal nerve, which subsequently leads to denervation of the broad fascial tensor fasciae latae, and this approach may also result in injury to the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus muscles. The muscle damage status significantly affects prognosis, and the minimally invasive approach is more suitable for elderly patients. ConclusionMRI can clarify the different types of muscle damage caused by different surgical approaches. Minimally invasive approaches can reduce muscle damage and improve postoperative function compared with traditional approaches, and can benefit elderly patients more, but due to the small field, forcing to expand the surgical field will lead to unintended muscle damage and reduce postoperative function.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 1 328 patients with esophageal cancer, who underwent esophagectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology from January 2010 to December 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. There were 726 males and 602 females, at an average age of 67.2±14.1 years. According to whether there was anastomotic leakage after operation, patients were divided into two groups: an anastomotic leakage group (167 patients) and a non-anastomotic leakage group (1 161 patients). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify related risk factors of anastomotic leakage after operation.Results The incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage was 12.6% (167/1 328). Univariate analysis showed that body mass index, arrhythmia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, preoperative albumin level, preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, lesion location, anastomosis types and postoperative pulmonary infection were associated with statistically significant increase in risk of cervical anastomotic leakage (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative COPD, lesion location and postoperative pulmonary infection were independent risk factors of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy (P<0.05).ConclusionThe occurrence of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer is related to many factors. The preoperative COPD, the lesion location and the postoperative pulmonary infection are independent high risk factors. Paying attention to these factors and doing perioperative management can effectively reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage.