Objective To explore the effects of the centralized management of bed use in a large-scale integrated hospital. Methods We selected the staff with good quality for centre work after setting up the bed use centralized management centre in the West China Hospital. Then, we formulated unified an admission principle and incorporated it into the systematic management and control, made a short instructional video for rolling show in the centre so as to let the patient know basic conditions of this hospital before admission; and regulated the admission process for patients’ convenience. Results After more than one year, the centre simplified the in-patient admission procedures, regulated the process, saved nursing manpower (24 persons), and increased patients’ satisfaction (from 89.30% to 93.25%). Meanwhile, the bed use rate was increased and the average length of stay was shortened the to some extent, which improved the order in wards. Conclusion Unified bed use management centre established in large-scale integrated hospitals, can save nursing manpower, simplify the admission process of patients, and meet the need for the development of hospitals, which is worthy of promoting application.
目的：为了在门诊“一切以病人为中心”的服务理念中体现人性化护理服务，为病人提供优质护理。方法：通过自行设计的问卷调查门诊病人的需求。针对这些需求及门诊护理工作的特点，提出作为门诊护士长及护士的管理要求。结果：病人需求最高的是高操的医疗技术和早就诊，早明确诊断，尽早治疗的迫切心理，各占95.18%、94.68%；其次是希望能有一简便、快捷、明了的就诊流程占88.59%，再其次为希望得到医护人员关注，对医护人员态度的要求比例也较高各占调查的85.17%和83.36%。结论：通过了解病人的需求，从护理的角度有针对性的实行有序管理，改善就诊流程，简化就诊手续，最终赢得病人的认可，使病人满意度提高至95%以上。
摘要:在汶川地震救援中,华西医院门诊部作为医院的窗口、形象,地震发生当天迅速组织人员,沉着、冷静地疏散门诊附近万名患者及家属,无一例踩伤、摔伤;随着各种渠道转来医院的患者增多,为利于有效的管理与护理人力安排,在保证门诊正常工作开展的前提下,服从医院大局安排,抽调护理人员承担起每日到机场接送患者的任务及急诊注射室的工作,为地震伤员的及时转送与救治、处理作出了应有的贡献。
Objective To explore the clinical practice effects of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) model led by enterostomal therapist in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic wounds. Methods Three types of subspecialty patients diagnosed and treated by the MDT team for chronic wounds in the Wound Care Center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2020 and December 2022, including MDT for diabetes feet, MDT for immune ulcer and MDT for other refractory wounds, were retrospectively included. The clinical data, healing rate, healing time, and satisfaction rate of patients were analyzed. Results A total of 176 patients were included, including 103 cases of diabetes foot, 31 cases of immune ulcer, and 42 cases of other refractory wounds. The healing rate was 71.84% in patients with MDT of diabetes foot, 74.19% in patients with MDT of immune ulcer and 78.57% in patients with MDT of other refractory wound. The average healing time was 18.10 weeks for patients with diabetes foot, 19.69 weeks for patients with immune ulcer, and 20.53 weeks for patients with other refractory wounds. The satisfaction rates of patients in the three groups were relatively high (>95%). Conclusion The MDT model led by enterostomal therapist can provide comprehensive treatment plans for difficult and complex chronic wound patients, improve the treatment outcomes of chronic wounds, and is worthy of further promotion and application in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of chronic wounds.
China is facing the serious situation of 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection. The health care institutions have actively participated in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease. Proper regulation of in-hospital policy may help control virus spreading. We developed seven key clinical questions about the prevention and control of 2019-novel coronavirus infection in hospital, and provided recommendations based on the best available evidence and expert experience. We interpreted the recommendations for better feasibility in Chinese hospital. The current recommendations provide evidence and reference for the domestic medical institutions to reasonably adjust the hospital workflow during 2019-nCoV infection period..
ObjectiveTo study the method of rapid and accurate measurement of body temperature in dense population during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.MethodsFrom January 27th to February 8th, 2020, subjects were respectively measured with two kinds of non-contact infrared thermometers (blue thermometer and red one) to measure the temperature of forehead, neck, and inner side of forearm under the conditions of 4–6℃ (n=152), 7–10℃ (n=103), and 11–25℃ (n=209), while the temperature of axillary was measured with mercury thermometer under the same conditions. Taking the mercury thermometer temperature as the gold standard, the measurement results with non-contact infrared thermometers were compared.ResultsAt 7–10℃, there was no statistical difference among the forehead temperatures measured by the two non-contact infrared thermometers and the axillary temperature (P>0.05); there was no difference among the temperature measured by blue thermometer on forehead, neck, and inner side of forearm (P>0.05); no difference was found between the temperature measured by the red thermometer on forehead and inner side of forearm (P>0.05), while there was statistical difference between the temperatures measured by the red thermometer on forehead and neck (P<0.05). Under the environment of 11−25℃, there was no statistical difference among the forehead temperatures measured by the two infrared thermometers and the axillary temperature (P>0.05); the difference between the temperatures of forehead and inner side of forearm measured by the blue thermometer was statistically significant (P<0.05), while no difference appeared between the forehead and neck temperatures measured by the blue thermometer (P>0.05); there was no statistical difference among the temperatures of three body regions mentioned above measured by the red thermometer (P>0.05). According to the manual, the allowable fluctuation range of the blue thermometer was 0.3℃, and that of the red one was 0.2℃. The mean differences in measured values between different measured sites of the two products were within the allowable fluctuation range. Therefore, the differences had no clinical significance in the environment of 7–25℃. Under the environment of 4–6℃, the detection rate of blue thermometer was 2.2% and that of the red one was 19.1%.ConclusionsThere is no clinical difference between the temperature measured by mercury thermometer and the temperature measured by temperature guns at 7–10 or 11–25℃, so temperature guns can be widely used. In order to maintain the maximum distance between the measuring and the measured persons and reduce the infection risk, it is recommended to choose the inner forearm for temperature measurement. Under the environment of ambient temperature 4–6℃, the detection rate of non-contact electronic temperature gun is low, requiring taking thermal measures for the instrument.