ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and locking proximal femoral plate (LPFP) for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients. MethodsWe respectively analyzed the clinical data of 116 senile patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture treated between October 2008 and March 2014. Among them, 60 were treated with PFNA, and 56 were treated with LPFP. We compared the two groups of patients in terms of operating time, surgical blood loss, surgical complications, walking exercise time, fracture healing time and joint function recovery. ResultsA total of 115 patients had regular follow-up from 12 to 24 months (averaging 15.7 months). One patient died. The operating time was (83.26±14.81) minutes in PFNA group and (102.58±15.31) minutes in LPFP group. The surgical blood loss was (202.16±33.14) mL in PFNA group and (255.80±45.92) mL in LPFP group. The walking exercise time was (1.80±0.91) weeks in PFNA group and (3.48±3.03) weeks in LPFP group. The fracture healing time was (11.80±2.26) weeks in PFNA group and (12.14±2.21) weeks in LPFP group. The postoperative Harris score for hip joint was 84.56±9.55 in PFNA group and 82.47±9.22 in LPFP group. There were statistical differences in operating time, surgical blood loss and walking exercise time (P<0.05), while no statistical differences were found in fracture healing time and postoperative Harris score for hip joint (P>0.05). ConclusionPFNA and LPFP are effective methods for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly people, but PFNA has a shorter operating time, less surgical blood loss and earlier walking exercise time.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of tissue engineered periosteum (TEP) constructed by porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) of rabbit to repair the large irregular bone defects in allogenic rabbits. MethodsThe BMSCs were cultivated from the bone marrow of New Zealand white rabbits (aged, 2 weeks-1 month). SIS was fabricated by porcine proximal jejunum. The TEP constructed by SIS scaffold and BMSCs was prepared in vitro. Eighteen 6-month-old New Zealand white rabbits whose scapula was incompletely resected to establish one side large irregular bone defects (3 cm×3 cm) model. The bone defects were repaired with TEP (experimental group,n=9) and SIS (control group,n=9), respectively. At 8 weeks after operation, the rabbits were sacrificed, and the implants were harvested. The general condition of the rabbits was observed; X-ray radiography and score according to Lane-Sandhu criteria, and histological examination (HE staining and Masson staining) were performed. ResultsAfter operation, all animals had normal behavior and diet; the incision healed normally. The X-ray results showed new bone formation with normal bone density in the defect area of experimental group; but no bone formation was observed in control group. The X-ray score was 6.67±0.32 in experimental group and was 0.32±0.04 in control group, showing significant difference (t=19.871,P=0.001). The general observation of the specimens showed bone healing at both ends of the defect, and the defect was filled by new bone in experimental group; no new bone formed in the control group. The histological staining showed new bone tissue where there were a lot of new vessels and medullary cavity, and no macrophages or lymphocytes infiltration was observed in the defect area of experimental group; only some connective tissue was found in the control group. ConclusionTEP constructed by porcine SIS and BMSCs of rabbit can form new bone in allogenic rabbit and has the feasibility to repair the large irregular bone defects.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of tissue engineered periosteum on the repair of large diaphysis defect in rabbit radius, and the effect of deproteinized bone (DPB) as supporting scaffolds of tissue engineering periosteum. MethodsBone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were cultured from 1-month-old New Zealand Rabbit and osteogenetically induced into osteoblasts. Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) scaffold was produced by decellular and a series mechanical and physiochemical procedures. Then tissue engineered periosteum was constructed by combining osteogenic BMSCs and SIS, and then the adhesion of cells to scaffolds was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fresh allogeneic bone was drilled and deproteinized as DPB scaffold. Tissue engineered periosteum/DPB complex was constructed by tissue engineered periosteum and DPB. Tissue engineered periosteum was "coat-like" package the DPB, and bundled with absorbable sutures. Forty-eight New Zealand white rabbits (4-month-old) were randomly divided into 4 groups (groups A, B, C, and D, n=12). The bone defect model of 3.5 cm in length in the left radius was created. Defect was repaired with tissue engineered periosteum in group A, with DPB in group B, with tissue engineered periosteum/DPB in group C; defect was untreated in group D. At 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation, 4 rabbits in each group were observed by X-ray. At 8 weeks after operation, 4 rabbits of each group were randomly sacrificed for histological examination. ResultsSEM observation showed that abundant seeding cells adhered to tissue engineered periosteum. At 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation, X-ray films showed the newly formed bone was much more in groups A and C than groups B and D. The X-ray film score were significantly higher in groups A and C than in groups B and D, in group A than in group C, and in group B than in group D (P<0.05). Histological staining indicated that there was a lot of newly formed bone in the defect space in group A, with abundant newly formed vessels and medullary cavity. While in group B, the defect space filled with the DPB, the degradation of DPB was not obvious. In group C, there was a lot of newly formed bone in the defect space, island-like DPB and obvious DPB degradation were seen in newly formed bone. In group D, the defect space only replaced by some connective tissue. ConclusionTissue engineered periosteum constructed by SIS and BMSCs has the feasibility to repair the large diaphysis defect in rabbit. DPB isn't an ideal support scaffold of tissue engineering periosteum, the supporting scaffolds of tissue engineered periosteum need further exploration.