ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of modified extensor indicis proprius (EIP) tendon transfer for reconstruction of spontaneously ruptured extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon by comparing with the traditional EIP tendon transfer. MethodsBetween January 2009 and December 2011, 11 cases of spontaneously ruptured EPL tendon were treated by modified EIP tendon transfer to reconstruct extension function (modified group). On the base of traditional procedure, the proximal end of EPL tendon was sutured with EIP tendon and the distal end of EIP tendon was crossed round extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) tendon and sutured back with EPL tendon. A specific EI-EPL evaluation method (SEEM) was used to measure the EPL tendon function after transfer. The result was compared with that of the other 18 cases undergoing traditional operation (traditional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, and injury causes between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention. In traditional group, 5 cases were out of follow-up, and the other 24 cases were followed up 1 year and 6 months on average (range, 8 months-2 years and 6 months). At the last follow-up, according to the evaluation of SEEM, the thumb elevation and flexion deficits of modified group were significantly less than those of traditional group (P lt; 0.05). The independent elevation deficit of the index finger of modified group was similar to that of traditional group (P gt; 0.05). The effectiveness was excellent in 9 cases and good in 2 cases with an excellent and good rate of 100% in modified group, and was excellent in 5 cases, good in 6 cases, and fair in 2 cases with an excellent and good rate of 84.6%. The effectiveness of modified group was significantly better than that of traditional group (χ2=0.03, P=0.03). ConclusionReconstruction of EPL tendon function by modified EIP tendon transfer is effective and easy. It can increase strength of the transferred tendon and obtain satisfactory results, but the long-term effectiveness needs further follow-up.
Objective To investigate the relationship between pancreatic cancer and pancreatic duct stone and the clinical features, diagnosis, treatment of pancreatic duct stone with pancreatic cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 10 patients suffering pancreatic duct stone with pancreatic cancer, admitted to our hospital from March 1992 to September 2007， were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe major symptom was abdominal pain (8/10) in pancreatolithiasis with pancreatic cancer and there were few characteristic symptoms. The positive percentages ofdiagnosis of this disease with B ultrasonography, CT and ERCP wererespectively 4/10, 6/10 and 5/5. The percentage of preoperative final diagnosis was 7/10, meanwhile there were 2 patients who were diagnosed during the operation and 1 patient with missed diagnosis. Surgical treatment was received by all of the patients. Pancreatoduodenectomy was performed in 8 patients. Pancreolithotomy plus pancreaticojejunostomy were performed in 1 patient because of misdiagnosis, while biopsy was only done in the last one. ConclusionCombination of multiple examinations can improve the accuracy of diagnosis of this disease. However, the preoperative diagnosis is not completely believable, and it is necessary to perform the pathological examination during operation. Pancreatoduodenectomy should be used as the first choice for pancreatic duct stone with pancreatic cancer.
Objective To evaluate the mid-term effectiveness of cerclage wires fixation in treating Mallory typeⅡperiprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty. Methods A retrospective analysis was made in the data of 14 patients (14 hips) with Mallory typeⅡ periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty and treated with cerclage wires fixation between January 2010 and June 2011 (fracture group). Twenty-eight patients (28 hips) without periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty at the same stage were chosen as control group. The uncemented femoral prosthesis were used in 2 groups. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, and primary disease between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and the complications were recorded. The Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the pain degree of hip. According to the postoperative X-ray films of hips, Enghet al. standard was used to evaluate the fixed and stable status of the femoral prosthesis; the heterotopic ossification was observed; the time of fracture union was recorded. Results The operation time of fracture group was significantly longer than that of control group (t=–3.590, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss between 2 groups (t=–1.276, P=0.209). All patients were followed up 64-75 months (mean, 69.5 months). Hip dislocation after operation occurred in 1 case of fracture group; delirium symptom and nonunion of incision occurred in 1 case and 1 case of control group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the Harris score and VAS score at 6 months and 5 years between 2 groups (P>0.05). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed and the mean time of fracture union were 6.1 months (range, 3-12 months). There was no fracture nonunion or malunion evidently. There was no significant difference in X-ray score at 6 months and 5 years between 2 groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, cerclage wires displacement or breakage did not occur. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 2 cases of fracture group and in 1 case of control group. Conclusion Cerclage wires fixation can achieve the good mid-term effectiveness in treating Mallory typeⅡintraoprative periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with primary hip arthroplasty.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of the surgeon’s handedness on the distribution of prosthesis during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 86 patients (100 knees) with primary TKA completed by the same right-handed surgeon between December 2016 and December 2018, including 72 cases of single knee and 14 of bilateral knees. The patients were divided into dominant group (right side) and non-dominant group (left side) according to the operating position of the surgeon and each group had 50 knees. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, clinical diagnosis, preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and other general data between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and complications were recorded in both groups. The function of knee was evaluated by HSS score. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured by using X-ray film of full-length lower extremity before TKA and at 2 weeks after TKA that were used to evaluate the coronal position of the prosthesis. Posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA) and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA) were measured by using lateral X-ray films at 3 months after operation that were used to evaluate the sagittal position of the prosthesis.ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (t=−1.128, P=0.262). One case of posterior tibial artery thrombosis occurred in the dominant group, and 1 case of poor healing of the incision occurred in each of the dominant group and the non-dominant group. Patients in both groups were followed up 12-34 months with an average of 22.0 months. The HSS scores at last follow-up were 87.2±4.3 in the dominant group and 86.8±5.0 in the non-dominant group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.471, P=0.639). No complications such as periprosthetic infection, prosthetic loosening, or periprosthetic fracture occurred during follow-up. There was no significant difference in the HKA, mLDFA, and mMPTA between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05). The differences in the incidence of sagittal femoral prosthesis malposition and PDFA between the two groups were significant (P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in the PPTA, the rate of femoral prosthesis distributed in the neutral position, the incidence of over-flexed femoral prosthesis, and the incidence of anterior femoral notch (P>0.05).ConclusionThe surgeon’s handedness is one of the factors affecting the placement of the sagittal femoral prosthesis in primary TKA. The incidence of sagittal femoral prosthesis malposition could increase when the surgeon performs on the non-dominant side.