【Abstract】ObjectiveTo evaluate the therapeutic benefits of three styles of hernioplasties such as the traditional hernioplasty, the mesh only hernioplasty and the plug amp; mesh hernioplasty. MethodsThe traditional hernioplasty in 534 cases(583 sides), the mesh only hernioplasty in 57 cases(60 sides) and the plug amp; mesh hernioplasty in 51 cases(54 sides) were performed. The comparing studies on the operative time, the postoperative complications, the recurrent rate and so on were analyzed. ResultsThe average operative time of the traditional styles group was (34.26±4.56) min, which was significantly shorter than the mesh only group 〔(40.35±6.24) min, P＜0.05〕 and the plug amp; mesh group 〔(49.12±8.69) min, P＜0.01〕 respectively. This significant difference between the mesh only group and the plug amp; mesh group was also identified (P＜0.05). Postoperative complications in the traditional styles group, the mesh only group and the plug amp; mesh group were 1.12%, 1.75% and zero,respectively (Pgt;0.05). Recurrent rate in the traditional styles group was 5.99%(32/534), which was significantly higher than that of the mesh only and the plug amp; mesh group (no recurrence). The average hospitalizing time in the traditional styles group, the mesh only group and the plug amp; mesh group was (7.11±3.06) days，（5.38±2.53） days and （6.19±3.61） days, respectively, in which there was no significant difference among groups. The activityrecovering time in the traditional styles group was (16.98±4.35) days, which was significantly longer than （7.26±2.46） days in the mesh only group and （8.02±3.35） days in the plug amp; mesh group. Conclusion The mesh only hernioplasty or the plug amp; mesh hernioplasty have a lower recurrent rate comparing with that in the traditional hernioplasty, which should be much more popularly applied in the treatment of inguinal hernia.