Objective To explore risk factors of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T1 rectal cancer. Methods The retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinicopathologic data of 247 patients with T1 rectal cancer underwent radical resection were analyzed in the pathological database of the West China Hospital from January 2000 to December 2016, including the tumor size (maximum diameter), gross type, differentiation degree, histological type, lymph vascular infiltration, perineural infiltration, and carcinoma nodule. The univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were done using the Chi-square test and logistic regression model, respectively. Results The rate of LNM in the patients with T1 rectal cancer was 8.50% (21/247). No lymph metastasis was found in the well differentiated T1 rectal cancer. The results of the univariate analysis showed that the differentiation degree, histological type, and carcinoma nodule were related to the LNM in the T1 rectal cancer (P<0.050). The results of the multivariate analysis revealed that the poor differentiation, mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet-ring cell carcinoma, and carcinoma nodule were the independent risk factors of the LNM in the T1 rectal cancer (OR=9.75, P=0.006; OR=5.98, P=0.042; OR=8.33, P=0.017; OR=10.87, P=0.026). Conclusion In this large population dataset, poor differentiation, mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet-ring cell carcinoma, and carcinoma nodule are risk factors of LNM in T1 rectal cancer.
Objective To compare the quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for gastric stromal tumor patients. Methods We collected the data of the patients undergoing the gastric stromal tumor surgery from May 2011 to August 2016 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and compared the basic data, complications, micturition time, hospital stay time, bleeding volume and hospitalization expenses. SF-36 scale was used to evaluate the quality of life. Then, SPSS 19.0 software was used for data analysis. Results Eighty nine patients involving 31 laparoscopic patients and 58 open surgery patients were included. There was no statistical significance in basic line between two groups. The laparoscopic group had shorter micturition time and hospital stay time, less intraoperative bleeding and lower hospitalization costs, the differences between two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). But there were no significant differences between two groups in the operation time and postoperative complication rate. The SF-36 quality of life scale of laparoscopic group and open surgery group were 737.7±68.3 and 665.1±138.1, respectively. The laparoscopic surgery group had higher scores in validity (VT), social function (SF) and mental health (MH) than those in open surgery group with significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is safe and effective for the patients with stromal tumor. Patients in laparoscopic group have shorter recovery time and higher quality of life than open surgery group. Due to the limited of study design, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.