Objective To summarize the surgical technique and the effectiveness of Becker V-shaped lateral rotation osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for Crowe type IV development dislocation of the hip (DDH). Methods Between January 2000 and December 2009, 18 patients (22 hips) with Crowe type IV DDH underwent THA. There were 3 males and 15 females with an average age of 54 years (range, 41-75 years). The unilateral hip was involved in 14 cases and bilateral hips in 4 cases. All patients had over anteversion of the femoral neck, with the acetabular anteversion angle of (21.28 ± 4.87)°, the femoral neck anteversion angle of (59.06 ± 1.44)°, and combined anteversion angle of (80.33 ± 1.55)°. All the patients had limb-length discrepancy, ranged from 1.0 to 3.5 cm (mean, 2.5 cm). Before operation, gluteus medius muscle strength was grade 2 in 17 hips and grade 3 in 5 hips; severe or moderate claudication was observed in 13 and 5 patients, respectively. Trendelenburg sign was positive in all patients. Preoperative Harris score was 30.00 ± 6.32. Cementless prosthesis was used. Becker V-shaped lateral rotation osteotomy and subtrochanteric shortening with overlapping femoral resection were performed, and proximal femoral shaft splitting was performed on 21 hips having narrow bone marrow cavity. Results All the cases achieved primary healing of incision. No complication of anterior dislocation, deep infection, nerve traction injury, or femoral uncontrolled fracture occurred. All the cases were followed up 3-12 years (mean, 8 years). Postoperative X-ray films showed that the initial fixation result of femoral prosthesis was excellent in 18 hips and good in 4 hips. Bone healing of osteotomy stump was obtained at 3-6 months (mean, 5 months) after operation. Affected limb prolonged for 2.5-3.5 cm (mean, 3.0 cm ) at 1 year after operation; limb-length discrepancy was 0.5-1.5 cm (mean, 1.0 cm). The gluteus medius muscle strength was restored to grade 4 in 5 hips and grade 5 in 17 hips. At last follow-up, 13 patients had no claudication, and 5 patients had mild claudication; Trendelenburg sign was negative in 15 cases and was positive in 3 cases; the Harris score was significantly improved to 91.89 ± 3.22; all showing significant difference when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). At last follow-up, the acetabular anteversion angle, the femoral neck anteversion angle, and combined anteversion angle were (19.33 ± 4.49), (13.33 ± 5.70), and (32.67 ± 5.35)°, respectively, all showing significant differences when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). No aseptic loosening, osteolysis, or rediolucent line was found around the femoral component. No implant subsidence, stem varus, or revision occurred. Conclusion Becker V-shaped lateral rotation osteotomy is a safe and predictable method to treat type Crowe type IV DDH.
Objective To compare the difference in the inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular cup measured by intraoperative robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and postoperative X-ray films and CT imaging. MethodsThe clinical data of 54 patients (54 hips) who underwent robot-assisted THA between May 2020 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 26 males (26 hips) and 28 females (28 hips), with an average age of 58.4 years (range, 39-71 years). The body mass index was 19.2-29.3 kg/m2, with an average of 25.2 kg/m2. All the patients had their first THA, including 31 cases of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, 12 cases of hip arthritis, 8 cases of femoral neck fracture, and 3 cases of developmental dysplasia of the hip. The anteversion and inclination angles of the acetabular cup were obtained through the surgical data in the robot host system. All patients underwent X-ray and CT scan examination within 2-7 days after operation to obtain the postoperative anteversion and inclination angles of the acetabular cup. According to the concept of “Lewinnek safe zone”, the proportion of acetabular in the safe zone intra- and post-operation were compared. ResultsThe operation time was 57.8-89.2 minutes, with an average of 68.3 minutes; the intraoperative blood loss was 125.0-450.0 mL, with an average of 204.8 mL. No adverse events such as dislocation of hip joint and infection occurred during hospitalization. The anteversion angle of acetabular cup was (40.8±0.6)° during operation and (41.2±2.8)° after operation, with no significant difference (t=1.026, P=0.307). The anteversion angle of acetabular cup measured during operation was (17.6±1.4)°, which was significantly smaller than that measured after operation (23.4±3.8)°(t=10.520, P=0.000). According to “Lewinnek safe zone”, 54 hips (100%) were in the safety zone during operation, and 16 hips were out of the safety zone, 38 hips were in the safty zone after operation, the ratio of the hips in the safty zone was 70.4%, showing a significant difference (χ2=18.783, P=0.000). ConclusionRobot-assisted THA can obtain accurate placement of the acetabular cup, but there is a large deviation between the anteversion angle of the acetabular cup in the lateral position during operation and the supine position after operation. Further study is needed to define the intraoperative placement position of the acetabular cup.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of the combined anteversion angle technique in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for treating ankylosing spondylitis (AS) affecting the hip joint. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 73 patients with AS affecting the hip joint who underwent THA between August 2018 and August 2021. According to whether the combined anteversion angle technique was used in THA, the patients were divided into study group (37 cases, combined anteversion angle technique was used in THA) and control group (36 cases, traditional THA). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, preoperative Harris score, range of motion (ROM), acetabular anteversion angle, acetabular abduction angle, femoral anteversion angle, and combined anteversion angle between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, hospital stay, and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. The Harris score and hip ROM were compared between the two groups before operation, at 1, 3, 6, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The acetabular component anteversion angle, femoral component anteversion angle, acetabular component abduction angle, and component combined anteversion angle were measured postoperatively. ResultsThe operation time in the study group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no intraoperative complication such as acetabular and proximal femoral fractures, neurovascular injuries in both groups, and the incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 2-3 years, with an average of 2.4 years; there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). During the follow-up period, there was no complication such as hip dislocation, wound infection, delayed wound healing, deep venous thrombosis, and hip dislocation in both groups. The hip Harris score and ROM of the two groups gradually increased with time after operation, and the differences were significant when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); the above two indicators of the study group were significantly better than those of the control group at each time point after operation (P<0.05). Extensive bone ingrowth on the surface of the components could be observed in the anteroposterior X-ray films of the hip joint of the two groups at 12 months after operation, and the acetabular components was stable without femoral stem subsidence, osteolysis around the components, and heterotopic ossification. At last follow-up, the acetabular component anteversion angle, femoral component anteversion angle, and component combined anteversion angle in the study group were significantly superior to those in the control group (P<0.05), except that there was no significant difference in the acetabular component abduction angle between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with AS affecting the hip joint, the use of the combined anteversion angle technique during THA effectively promotes the recovery of hip joint function and enhances the postoperative quality of life of patients when compared to traditional THA.
Objective To investigate the accuracy and effectiveness of acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) after lumbar fusion applying of modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angles test system. Methods A clinical data of 45 patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis between January 2018 and June 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. All patients had previously received lumbar fusion. The modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angle test system was used in 26 cases (observation group) and not used in 19 cases (control group) during THA. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, operative side, number of lumbar fusion segments, and preoperative Harris score between the two groups (P>0.05). The position of acetabular prosthesis, hip function (Harris score), and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results In the observation group, all acetabular cups were in the safe zone (anteversion angle, 25°-30°) during operation, and 1 acetabular cup (3.85%) was not in the safe zone after operation. In the control group, 9 acetabular cups (47.37%) were not in the safe zone. The postoperative difference between the two groups was significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between intra- and post-operative acetabular inclination angles in the observation group (P>0.05), and the postoperative acetabular inclination angle was significantly smaller in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). All incisions healed by first intention and no infection occurred. All patients were followed up 6 months. There was no significant difference in Harris score between the two groups at different time point (P>0.05), and there were significant differences between different time points in the two groups (P<0.05). No joint dislocation occurred in the observation group during follow-up, while dislocation occurred in 2 cases and femoral impingement syndrome occurred in 1 case of the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For THA patients with lumbar fusion, the ideal placement angle of the acetabular cup can be obtained by using the modified acetabular anteversion and inclination angles test system during operation.