摘要:目的：评价围手术期预防性应用抗菌药物现状及合理性。方法：采用回顾性调查的方法，随机抽查2009年度Ⅰ类切口手术围手术期病案500份，设计外科围手术期预防性应用抗生素调查表，对预防用药的适应证、用药种类、联合用药、给药时机及持续时间进行统计分析。结果：未使用抗生素5例，预防性使用抗生素495例，其中不合理80例（16.00％）。预防性使用抗生素总品规数为540，其中头孢菌素类453例（83.89%），青霉素类（包括加酶抑制剂）26例（4.81%），喹诺酮类44例（8.15%）。选用头孢唑啉钠178例（32.96%）居第一位，头孢替唑钠第二，151例（2796%）。结论：Ⅰ类切口手术患者围手术期预防性使用抗菌药物较为合理，但仍存在用药指征把握不严，抗菌药物的选择、抗菌药物使用时间较长等问题，有待进一步规范化管理。Abstract: Objective: To understand the current application of perioperative preventive antibiotics, and their rationality. Methods: Five hundred perioperative records of patients with incision Ⅰ were randomly chosen and surveyed in 2009. A questionnaire for prophylactic use of antimicrobial was designed. The indication of antimicrobial use, the species, combination, timing and drug duration were analyzed. Results: Our of 500, 495 used antimicrobial and 80 were unreasonable; 540 kinds of antimicrobial were used, included cephalosporin 453 cases (83.89%), penicillin class (including plus enzyme inhibitors) in 26 cases (4.81%), quinolone 44 cases (8.15%). Cefazolin sodium (178 patients, 32.96%) ranked first, second was cefazolin sodium (151, 27.96%). Conclusion: Perioperative use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with incision Ⅰ is reasonable, but standardization management should be strengthened in the indication, species, and duration.
Objective To clarify the bacterial spectrum and drug resistance of different biliary diseases through bile culture results. Methods Patients who underwent surgical treatment and retained bile for cultivation at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 were retrospectively collected. Clinical data such as bile bacterial culture and antibiotic sensitivity results, surgical reasons, and perioperative complications were recorded. Results A total of 272 patients were included, including 142 males and 130 females, aged (53.4 ± 14.1) years old. Intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones were the most common surgical cause, accounting for 32.4%. The positive rate of bile culture in benign diseases was 78.7%, which was higher than that in malignant diseases (48.5%). The infection related complications (30.0% vs. 6.7%), bile leakage rate (20.8% vs. 6.7%), and poor wound healing rate (24.0% vs. 0.0%) in the bile culture positive group were higher than those in the bile bacteria culture negative group (P<0.05). Among 183 patients with positive bile bacterial culture, a total of 294 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected. There were 96 patients with single bacterial infection, 66 patients with two bacterial infections simultaneously, 18 patients with three bacterial infections, and 3 patients with four or more bacterial infections. Escherichia coli was the most common bacterium, accounting for 17.0%. There were differences in the positive rate of bile culture among patients with different etiologies (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the sensitivity rate of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecalis for many antibacterial drugs. Conclusions There are differences in the positive rate of bacterial culture in the biliary tract of patients with different etiologies, and there is a possibility of mixed infection. It is necessary to select appropriate antibiotics for empirical treatment based on different etiologies. The use of antibiotics should be changed in a timely manner based on the results of bile culture.