Objective To review the application progress of non-biological meshes for breast reconstruction (BR). Methods The related home and abroad researches in BR were reviewed and summarized. Results Non-biological meshes can be divided into degradable and nondegradable. The former has many types, whether its degradation rate can match with the grow rate of repair tissue will significantly affect the wound healing and tissue intergradation. TiLOOP, on behalf of the latter, has a good postoperative performance due to its nano TiO2 layer, lightness and flexibility. Non-biological meshes have been gradually used to cover and fix implant in BR. Compared with biological meshes, non-biological meshes are cheaper and have a more positive postoperative performance generally, but definite comparison can’t be concluded due to the limited data. Conclusion As non-biological meshes are applied to BR preliminarily, their effectiveness are still needed to be observed further.
Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness of different skin closure techniques in stoma reversal using network meta-analysis. Methods CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched until February 1, 2021, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes between different skin closure techniques were included. Data were processed using Stata MP16.0 and R 3.6.1. Results The results demonstrated that 16 RCTs (n=2 139) were eligible for pooling. Six types of skin closure techniques were used: linear closure, purse-string closure, gunsight closure, linear closure and drainage, purse-string closure and drainage, and linear closure and biological mesh. Network meta-analysis indicated that the incidence of postoperative infection with linear closure was higher than that with purse-string closure [RR=6.04, 95%CI (3.11, 16.89), P<0.0001], gunsight closure [RR=10.75, 95%CI (1.12, 152.12), P=0.04], and linear closure and drainage [RR=3.18, 95%CI (1.24, 10.20), P=0.03]. The purse-string closure was superior to linear closure and biological mesh [RR=0.15, 95%CI (0.01, 0.88), P=0.03] in reducing postoperative infection. The length of hospital stay after linear suture was longer than that after linear suture and drainage [MD=1.16, 95%CI (0.29, 2.20), P=0.02]. Conclusions This network meta-analysis suggests that purse-string closure and gunsight closure might be best for reducing postoperative infection, and the addition of drainage could not further reduce the incidence of postoperative infection. In addition, implantation of the biological mesh does not increase the risk of postoperative infection. However, a large-scale RCT is warranted to confirm the results.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effects of biological mesh (BM) and non-absorbable synthetic mesh (SM) on the risks of recurrence, complications, and cost-effectiveness after ventral hernia repair. MethodsThe publicly published related researches of BM versus SM for ventral hernia repair were searched in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM databases from the establishment of the databases to August 1, 2021. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literatures were screened and the data were extracted, and the data that met the conditions were merged and analyzed. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan5.4.1 software. ResultsA total of 26 studies with 3 259 patients were included, including 1 388 patients in the BM group and 1 871 in the SM group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the recurrence, surgical site infection, surgical site occurrence, reoperation rates, and medical costs in the BM group were higher than those in the SM group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the patch infection, seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, and readmission rates between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionsSM during ventral hernia repair is better than BM on postoperative recurrence, surgical site infection, surgical site occurrence, reoperation, etc., and could reduce medical costs. In the future, it is tried to use more SM in patients with complicated ventral hernia such as cleaning pollution and contaminated environment.