west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "cervical sagittal parameter" 2 results
  • Analysis of cervical sagittal parameters on MRI in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

    Objective To analyse the correlation between cervical sagittal parameters of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in different sagittal curvature so as to find out representative cervical sagittal alignment parameters by measuring on MRI. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 88 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy between July 2015 and January 2016. The C2-C7 Cobb angle, T1 slope (T1S), and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA) were measured on T2-weight MRI. According to C2-C7 Cobb angle, the patients were divided into lordosis group (≥10° Cobb angle, 48 cases) and straightened group (0-10° Cobb angle, 40 cases). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the reliability of measured data, Pearson correlation analysis for correlation between cervical sagittal parameters. Results ICC was 0.858-0.946, indicating good consistency of measurement parameters. The C2-C7 Cobb angle, T1S, and C2-C7 SVA were (5.6±2.4)°, (22.2±6.7)°, and (10.2±5.4) mm in straightened group, and were (20.1±8.2)°, (23.4±8.9)°, and (8.2±4.6) mm in lordosis group respectively. There was no correlation between the 3 parameters in straighten group (r=0.100,P=0.510 for T1S and C2-C7 Cobb angle;r=–0.100,P=0.500 for T1S and C2-C7 SVA;r=0.080,P=0.610 for C2-C7 Cobb angle and C2-C7 SVA). There was positive correlation between T1S and C2-C7 Cobb angle (r=0.540,P=0.000), negative correlation between T1S and C2-C7 SVA (r=–0.450,P=0.001), and no correlation between C2-C7 Cobb angle and C2-C7 SVA (r=–0.003,P=0.980). Conclusion For cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with cervical lordosis, only T1S measurement on MRI can be used as the main parameter to judge the sagittal curvature, but in patients with straightened cervical Cobb angle, measurements of T1S, C2-C7 Cobb angle, and C2-C7 SVA should be taken for the comprehensive evaluation of cervical sagittal curvature.

    Release date:2017-04-12 11:26 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Correlation analysis between C7 slope and cervical sagittal parameters in short segment anterior cervical discectomy with fusion

    Objective To elucidate the relationship between preoperative C7 slope (C7S) and sagittal parameters in anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) by imaging. Methods A retrospective analysis of 54 patients (24 males and 30 females) with ACDF for cervical spondylosis between January 2012 and January 2017 was performed. The age ranged from 23 to 71 years (mean, 46.6 years). There were 29 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and 25 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The disease duration ranged from 3 to 48 months, with an average of 16.8 months. In the 55 patients, 44 were single-segment ACDF and 10 were double-segment ACDF. Sagittal parameters of cervical spine were measured on cervical X-ray films before operation and at last follow-up, including C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA), C7S, and segment Cobb angle (SCobb), and the changes of C2-7 Cobb angle (the difference between the last follow-up and the preoperative angle) were calculated. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between the parameters before operation and at last follow-up. According to the preoperative median value of C7S (15°), the patients were divided into group A (C7S<15°) and group B (C7S≥15°). The sagittal parameters before and after operation were compared between the two groups. Results All the 54 patients were followed up 6-45 months (mean, 15.5 months). At last follow-up, C7S, C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 SVA, and SCobb angle were significantly improved when compared with preoperative values (P<0.05). Correlation analysis showed that the preoperative C7S and SCobb angles were significantly correlated with C2-7 Cobb angle and C2-7 SVA (P<0.05), but there was no significant correlation between C7S and SCobb angle (r=0.049, P=0.724). There was a significant correlation between C7S, C2-7 Cobb angle, and SCobb angle at last follow-up (P<0.05), but there was no significant correlation between C7S and SCobb angles and C2-7 SVA (P>0.05). According to the median value of preoperative C7S, 28 patients in group A had C7S of (11.82±3.60)°, while 26 patients in group B had C7S of (20.77±4.09)°. There was no significant difference in gender and age between the two groups (P>0.05). The preoperative C2-7 Cobb angle and C2-7 SVA in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between preoperative SCobb angle and group B (t=0.234, P=0.816). There were no significant differences in C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 SVA, and SCobb angle between group A and group B at last follow-up (P>0.05). However, the change of C2-7 Cobb angle in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (t=2.321, P=0.024). Conclusion Preoperative C7S≥15° group has more physiological lordosis before operation, but its postoperative cervical curvature changes less, while ACDF is more conducive to correct the preoperative C7S<15 ° cervical curvature.

    Release date:2019-06-20 03:12 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content