Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) after bee sting. Methods A prospective observational analysis was made on patients with AKI after bee sting treated in Jianyang People’s Hospital or West China Hospital of Sichuan University between July 2015 and December 2020. According to different initial renal replacement therapy modes, the patients were divided into IHD group and CRRT group. The IHD group received hemodialysis for 4 hours each time, once a day or 3-5 times a week; the CRRT group used Prismaflex machine for continuous veno-venous hemofiltration or continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration within 72 hours after admission, for at least 12 hours a day, followed by CRRT or IHD, depending on the patient’s condition. Both groups could be treated with hemoperfusion (HP) and symptomatic support such as glucocorticoid, blood transfusion and fluid rehydration. The IHD group was divided into IHD subgroup and IHD+HP subgroup, and the CRRT group was divided into CRRT subgroup and CRRT+HP subgroup according to whether renal replacement therapy was combined with HP. The basic information of patients and clinical laboratory examination results were collected, and the renal function recovery and mortality rates of patients in the two groups were compared, as well as the changes of laboratory indicators. Results A total of 106 patients were enrolled, 50 in the IHD group and 56 in the CRRT group. There was no statistical difference in the rate of complete renal function recovery 30, 60, or 90 days after treatment between the two groups (28.2% vs. 31.2%, P=0.758; 46.2% vs. 50.0%, P=0.721; 82.1% vs. 81.2%, P=0.924). But in the CRRT subgroup analysis, there was a statistical difference in the 30-day renal function recovery rate of CRRT+HP patients compared with CRRT alone (47.6% vs. 18.5%, P=0.031), while no statistical difference was found in the IHD subgroup analysis. After 3 days of treatment, the levels of creatine kinase of the IHD+HP subgroup and the CRRT+HP subgroup were lower than those in the IHD and CRRT subgroups, and the differences were statistically significant [(7875±6871) vs. (15157±8546) U/L, P=0.026; (10002±8256) vs. (14498±10362) U/L, P=0.032]. There was no statistical difference in 30-day mortality or incidence of serious adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions There is no obvious difference in improving renal prognosis or reducing mortality between CRRT and IHD for patients with AKI after bee sting. However, CRRT combined with HP therapy could shorten the recovery time of renal function and increase the 30-day kidney recovery rate. HP may contribute to early renal function recovery in patients with AKI after bee sting, but more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm this.
Severe acute kidney injury usually requires renal replacement therapy. Intermittent hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, continuous renal replacement therapy, and prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy are the four common modalities of renal replacement therapy. Whether one modality of renal replacement therapy is superior to another in clinical practice remains controversial. The impact of the choice of renal replacement therapy modality on the short-term and long-term prognosis of patients needs to be further explored in large-scale randomized controlled studies and a longer follow-up time. This article will discuss the development history of renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury, the current status of its application, and the comparison of the four treatment modalities, in order to help clinicians have a deeper understanding of how to design individualized renal replacement therapy programs for patients with acute kidney injury under the guidance of the concept of precision medicine.
Objective To investigate the effects of normal saline flushing and its frequency on extracorporeal circuit lifespan and solute removal in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) without anticoagulation. Methods Patients undergoing continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) without anticoagulation between June and September 2021 were prospectively collected. The patients were randomly divided into three groups by envelope method, namely 30 min-flushing group (flushing every 30 minutes for extracorporeal circulation), 2 h-flushing group (flushing every 2 hours for extracorporeal circulation), and non-flushing group (no flushing for extracorporeal circulation during treatment). All patients were treated with Prismaflex V8.0 CRRT machine and matched AN69ST-ST150 extracorporeal circuit, through either femoral or internal jugular venous double-lumen catheter. CVVHDF was adopted, the blood pump rate was 200 mL/min, and the rates of replacement fluid and dialysate were both 1 000 mL/h. The replacement fluid was pre-post dilution. Extracorporeal circuit lifespan, treatment time delayed by flushing, overall treatment time of CRRT, actual treatment time of CRRT, proportion of actual treatment time achieved, delayed daily treatment time, and small molecule solute removal efficiency before and after treatment were recorded. Results A total of 83 patients were included, including 24 in the 30 min-flushing group, 30 in the 2 h-flushing group, and 29 in the non-flushing group. There were significant differences in the indexes of extracorporeal circuit lifespan and various treatment time indicators among the three groups (P<0.05). Compared with the 2 h-flushing group and the non-flushing group, the 30 min-flushing group significantly shortened the extracorporeal circuit lifespan, delayed more treatment time by flushing, and delayed the longest daily treatment time (P<0.05). The proportion of actual treatment time in the non-flushing group was significantly higher than that in the 30 min-flushing group and the 2 h-flushing group (P<0.05), and in the 2 h-flushing group was also higher than that in the 30 min-flushing group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the blood urea nitrogen clearance rate among the three groups (P=0.570), but the serum creatinine clearance rate was significantly different among the three groups (P=0.020). Compared with the 30 min-flushing group, the 2 h-flushing group had a higher serum creatinine clearance rate, and there was statistical significance (P<0.05). Twenty-five patients had hypotension during treatment. The frequency of 30 min-flushing caused a higher risk of coagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass (hazard ratio=2.502, P=0.001). Conclusion For CVVHDF without anticoagulation, longer extracorporeal circuit lifespan and longer effective treatment time can be achieved without using normal saline flush.
Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of two different anticoagulation regimens of fondaparinux and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing CRRT in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between October 2021 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into fondaparinux sodium group and LMWH group according to anticoagulation with fondaparinux or LMWH during CRRT. The general condition, life expectancy of cardiopulmonary bypass, coagulation events, bleeding events, hemoglobin, and coagulation function-related indicators were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 78 patients were finally included, including 38 in the LMWH group and 40 in the fondaparinux group. The age of the patients in the LMWH group was older than that in the fondaparinux group [76.0 (57.0, 85.0) vs. 63.0 (52.3, 76.0) years, P=0.016]. There was no significant difference in other clinical baseline conditions (including gender, vascular access site, and treatment indications) between the two groups (P≥0.05). The cardiopulmonary bypass life of patients in the fondaparinux group was better than that in the LMWH group [67.1 (35.0, 72.0) vs. 42.0 (20.0, 55.3) h, P=0.003]. The survival rate of cardiopulmonary bypass in the fondaparinux group at 24, 48, and 72 h were higher than that in the LMWH group (87.5% vs. 65.8%, P=0.023; 67.5% vs. 36.8%, P=0.007; 42.5% vs. 13.2%, P=0.004). The incidence of blood filter coagulation events in the fondaparinux group was lower than that in the LMWH group (50.0% vs. 84.2%, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of coagulation events and mild bleeding events between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in hemoglobin and coagulation function-related indicators between the two groups before and after CRRT (P>0.05). Conclusion The continuity of maintenance therapy with fondaparinux is better than that of LMWH, and the safety of both in the course of CRRT treatment is comparable.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of in vitro anticoagulation with nafamostat mesilate in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods The study subjects were sepsis patients with AKI who underwent CRRT in West China Hospital of Sichuan University and were at high risk of bleeding. CRRT patients who received in vitro anticoagulation with nafamostat mesilate between July 2021 and January 2022 were included in the nafamostat group. The medical records of CRRT patients who did not use anticoagulants between January 2020 and December 2020 were retrospectively collected as a control group. The general situation, the lifespan of the first CRRT filter, the number of filters used within 72 hours of treatment, laboratory tests before and after treatment, and the occurrence of adverse reactions during treatment of the two groups of patients were analyzed. Results There were 42 patients in the control group and 21 patients in the nafamostat group. There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, mean arterial pressure, primary disease, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ score, or pre-treatment laboratory test results between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the lifespan of the first filter was longer in the nafamostat group than in the control group (hazard ratio=0.408, P<0.05). The number of filters used by the control group patients after 72 hours of treatment was greater than that of the nafamostat group patients (2.1±0.6 vs. 1.3±0.5, P<0.05). After 72 hours of treatment, serum creatinine levels [(99.4±15.7) vs. (127.6±20.5)] μmol/L], urea nitrogen [(4.5±1.9) vs. (6.8±2.3) mmol/L], cystatin C [(1.0±0.2) vs. (1.2±0.2) mg/L], uric acid [(86.5±15.3) vs. (105.3±20.3) μmol/L] in the nafamostat group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in the results of other laboratory tests (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with sepsis complicated with AKI who undergo CRRT and are at high risk of bleeding, nafamostat mesilate may be a safe and effective anticoagulant for in vitro anticoagulation.
Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of regional citrate anticoagulation in hemoperfusion combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Methods Patients who underwent continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration tandem hemoperfusion between January 2021 and March 2022 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively enrolled. All patients received double-lumen catheter indwelling through internal jugular vein or femoral vein for vascular access, and were treated with Prismaflex V8.0 CRRT machine, extracorporeal circulation line ST150, and disposable hemoperperfusion device HA380. Four percent sodium citrate was pumped from the arterial end at the rate of 180-200 mL/h. The blood pump rate was 130-150 mL/min, the ratio of dialysis fluid to the dose of replacement fluid was 1∶1, the amount of CRRT treatment agent was 20-35 mL/(kg·h), replacement fluid was added by post-dilution method, and the treatment time of hemoperfusion was 8-10 h. The dialysis treatment completion rate, the cardiopulmonary bypass life, the incidence of coagulation events, and the levels of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, etc. were observed. Results A total of 143 cases of treatment were completed in 75 patients, among them, 119 cases were successfully completed and the completion rate of hemoperfusion treatment was 83.2%. The average life of hemoperfusion devices was (8.5±1.5) h. Bleeding or blood clotting occurred in 18.9% of the treatment (27/143), 13 cases had CRRT extracorporeal circulation coagulation, 11 cases had hemoperfusion device coagulation, and 3 cases had gastrointestinal bleeding. The ionic calcium levels after the filter of 93 cases of treatment were maintained around 0.25-0.35 mmol/L, and the peripheral calcium levels were maintained around 1.0-1.1 mmol/L. Compared with that at 0 h, the procalcitonin decreased significantly 72 h after hemoperfusion treatment (P=0.014), while there was no significant change in interleukin-6 or C-reactive protein after 72 h treatment (P>0.05). None of the patients experienced anaphylaxis during treatment. Conclusion In CRRT combined with hemoperfusion, the use of regional citrate anticoagulation results in good cardiopulmonary bypass life, inflammatory mediators clearance, and a lower risk of bleeding.
Objective To investigate the difference of anticoagulant efficacy of heparin and citric acid during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and analyze their effects of on filter life span, length of hospital stay and mortality. Methods Patients with severe acute pancreatitis in Intensive Care Unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University between January 2018 and July 2022 were retrospectively enrolled, and they were divided into heparin group (control group) and citric acid group (research group) according to anticoagulation methods. The differences of anticoagulant catheter blockage during CRRT, filter life span, length of hospital stay, and 90-day mortality between the two groups were analyzed. Results A total of 108 patients were enrolled, including 56 in the research group and 52 in the control group. In pre-CRRT treatment, the balance value of fluid intake and outflow in the research group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The 108 patients received 217 times of CRRT treatment totally, with a median length of treatment of 63 h (range 44-87 h). The severity of catheter blockage in the research group was lower than that in the control group (P=0.003). The filter life span was longer in the research group than that in the control group [42.5 vs. 29.0 h; hazard ratio=1.83, 95% confidence interval (1.23, 2.73), P<0.001]; in the comparison of 90-day mortality, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The mean use of filters in the research group was less than that in the control group (1.93±0.09 vs. 2.17±0.14, P<0.001). The downtime of CRRT due to filter life in the research group was obviously shorter than that in the control group [120 (0, 720) vs. 300 (0, 890) min, P=0.029], while the duration of CRRT in the research group was remarkably better than that in the control group [10.6 (4.9, 27.7) vs. 8.1 (3.6, 25.0) d, P=0.024], and the risk of filter replacement due to special conditons in the research group was lower than that in the control group (46.4% vs. 65.4%, P=0.048). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of intensive care unit hospitalization or total hospitalization between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Both heparin and citric acid could assist the treatment of CRRT, while citric acid might be apt to improve local coagulation and systemic inflammatory response.
Objective To evaluate the effects of two filtration fraction formulas on extracorporeal circulation life of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) under regional citrate anticoagulation. Methods Patients with acute kidney injury who received CRRT treatment with regional citrate anticoagulation and the estimated CRRT duration was greater than 24 h at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between June 2022 and April 2023 were selected. They were randomly divided into continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH), continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) groups using Prismaflex machines. The life of the CRRT extracorporeal circulation in the three groups of patients was compared, and the reasons for replacing the extracorporeal circulation after 72 h were not used, and the filtration fraction score of the three groups was calculated according to the two filtration score calculation formulas (Formula 1 and Formula 2) currently used in the world. The filtration value obtained by the two filtration fraction calculation formulas was taken as the test variable, and whether the median life of the group with the longest extracorporeal circulation life was taken as the state variable, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the area under the curve was calculated. Results A total of 121 patients were included, including 40 patients in the CVVH group, 40 patients in the CVVHD group, and 41 patients in the CVVHDF group. The extracorporeal circulation life of CVVH group, CVVHD group and CVVHDF group was 64 (46, 71) h, 47 (31.5, 54) h and 70 (65, 72) h, respectively, with statistical difference (log-rank P=0.036). A total of 94 cases were replaced due to filter or venous pot clotting after 72 h after the filter was not used, including 30 cases in the CVVH group, 39 cases in the CVVHD group, and 25 cases in the CVVHDF group. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant (χ2=15.83, P<0.001). According to Formula 1, the filtration fraction of CVVH group, CVVHD group and CVVHDF group was 15.8% (15.2%, 17.0%), 1.1% (0.7%, 2.1%) and 16.2% (14.9%, 17.6%), respectively, and the difference among the three groups was statistically significant (H=69.402, P<0.001). According to Formula 2, the filtration fraction of CVVH group, CVVHD group and CVVHDF group was 33.1% (32.4%, 35.7%), 4.0% (3.6%, 4.9%) and 19.1% (17.7%, 20.7%), respectively, and the differences among the three groups and pairwise comparison between groups were statistically significant (P<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curvec calculated by the Formula 1 and 2 for the influence of filtration fraction on extracorporeal circulation life were 0.539 and 0.668, the sensitivity were 43.18% and 82.22%, and the specificity were 80.65% and 56.25%, respectively. Conclusions When using Prismaflex machine, the filter life of CVVHD is shorter than CVVH and CVVHDF modes. The filtration fraction calculated by Formula 2 is more sensitive but less specific in predicting CRRT extracorporeal circulation life. Filtration fraction as a CRRT extracorporeal circulation risk assessment has limitations, especially for the CVVH model with pre and post replacement.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate as an in vitro anticoagulant in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) using oXiris filters for patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI). Methods SA-AKI patients at high risk of bleeding who received oXiris filter-CRRT at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between November 2021 and January 2023 were included in the study. Patients who received nafamostat mesylate as an anticoagulant were categorized into the nafamostat group, while patients who did not receive any anticoagulant during the same period were categorized into the control group. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups regarding general conditions, the lifespan of the first filter in CRRT, the number and percentage of cases with the first filter lasting 24, 48, and 72 h, activated clotting time (ACT) before and during treatment (both pre-filter and post-filter), laboratory test results before and after treatment, incidence of adverse reactions during treatment, and clinical outcomes of the patients. The mean ± standard deviation was used for normal distribution, and the median (lower quartile, upper quartile) was used for non-normal distribution. Results A total of 118 patients were included in the study, with 90 in the control group and 28 in the nafamostat group. There was no statistically significant difference in the general conditions or pre-treatment laboratory test indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the lifespan of the first filter was longer in the nafamostat group compared to the control group (hazard ratio=0.524, P=0.001). The percentage of patients whose first filter lasted 24 h was higher in the nafamostat group than that in the control group (60.7% vs. 25.7%, P=0.001); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the first filter lasting 48 h or 72 h (P>0.05). During CRRT treatment, the mean post-filter ACT was longer in the nafamostat group than that in the control group [(216.7±43.2) vs. (181.6±35.5) s, P<0.001], and the mean post-filter ACT was longer than the pre-filter ACT in the nafamostat group [(216.7±43.2) vs. (183.3±37.7) s, P=0.005]. After the treatment, the international normalized ratio [1.5 (1.1, 1.8) vs. 1.7 (1.4, 2.4)], interleukin-6 levels [(235.5±80.9) vs. (500.5±112.7) pg/mL] were lower, and platelet count [48.0 (31.8, 73.0)×109/L vs. 29.0 (11.0, 61.8)×109/L] was higher in the nafamostat group compared to the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in other laboratory test indicators (P>0.05). The clinical outcomes of the patients did not show statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Nafamostat mesilate may be an effective and safe anticoagulant in SA-AKI patients at high risk of bleeding underwent oXiris filter-CRRT, and its in vitro anticoagulant effect is better than that without anticoagulant.
Objective To explore the application of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for patients with sepsis and hyperlactacidemia, and to provide a basis for the clinical application of RCA in such patients. Methods Sepsis patients who underwent RCA-CRRT at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between May 2021 and May 2023 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into a normal lactate group (≤2.0 mmol/L) and a hyperlactacidemia group (>2.0 mmol/L) based on their initial lactate levels before CRRT, and subgroup analysis was performed on patients with moderate hyperlactacidemia (2 mmol/L<lactate level<4 mmol/L) and severe hyperlactacidemia (≥4.0 mmol/L). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used, and baseline characteristics and outcome measures of different groups of patients were compared. Results A total of 441 patients were included, with 228 in the normal lactate group and 213 in the hyperlactacidemia group. Before PSM, there were statistically significant differences in the proportion of liver failure, proportion of chronic kidney disease, mean arterial pressure, bicarbonate, total bilirubin, creatinine, activated partial thromboplastin time, international standardized ratio, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 between the normal lactate group and the hyperlactacidemia group (P<0.05). After PSM, there were 162 patients in both the normal lactate group and the hyperlactacidemia group. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). The incidence of citric acid accumulation in the normal lactate group and the hyperlactacidemia group was 13.0% and 25.9%, respectively (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of metabolic acidosis, metabolic alkalosis, hypernatremia, filter coagulation events, or in-hospital mortality between the two groups (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the first extracorporeal circulation lifespan between the normal lactate group and the hyperlactacidemia group (P>0.05). Among 213 patients with hyperlactacidemia, 186 had moderate hyperlactacidemia and 27 had severe hyperlactacidemia. Before PSM, there were statistically significant differences in the proportion of male, proportion of diabetes, albumin level, international standardized ratio, and interleukin-6 between moderate and severe hyperlactacidemia groups (P<0.05). After PSM, there were 22 patients in both the moderate and severe hyperlactacidemia groups. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). The incidence of citric acid accumulation was 18.2% and 50.0% in the moderate and severe hyperlactacidemia groups, respectively (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of metabolic acidosis, metabolic alkalosis, hypernatremia, filter coagulation events, or in-hospital mortality between the two groups (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the first extracorporeal circulation lifespan between the moderate and severe hyperlactacidemia groups (P>0.05). Conclusion When RCA is used for CRRT anticoagulation in patients with sepsis and hyperlactacidemia, the incidence of citric acid accumulation is high (especially in patients with severe hyperlactacidemia), and should be closely monitored.