Objective To investigate the treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture with mini-plate and to evaluate the cl inical results. Methods Between September 2006 and March 2009, 14 patients with ulnar coronoid process fracture were treated with open reduction and internal fixation of mini-plate. There were 10 males and 4 females with an average age of 29 years (range, 14-51 years). Fracture was caused by fall ing from height in 4 cases and traffic accident in 10cases. The locations were left side in 6 cases and right side in 8 cases. According to Regan-Morrey classification, there were 2 cases of type I, 6 of type II, and 6 of type III. The flexion-extension arc of the elbow was (60 ± 10)° and the forearm rotation was (70 ± 10)°. The disease duration was 30 minutes to 11 days, and CT scan was used for definite diagnosis. Patients received early functional exercise 1 week postoperatively. Results All incisions healed by first intention. Fourteen cases were followed up 12-25 months (17 months on average). All fractures healed well, and the average union time was 10 weeks with a range of 7-12 weeks. No 1oosening or breakage of the internal fixation occurred except for 2 patients who had heterotopic ossification. The flexion-extension arc of the elbow was (110 ± 10)° and the forearm rotation was (130 ± 15)°, showing significant difference when compared with that before operation (P lt; 0.05). The cl inical results were evaluated according to Morrey’s scale, 8 cases were rated as excellent, 4 as good, and 2 as fair; the excellent and good rate was 85.7%. Conclusion Fixation of ulnar coronoid process fracture with mini-plate provides sufficient stabil ity to do early functional exercise and it can enhance functional outcome.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of non-absorbable suture or suture anchor fixation by anterior approach in the treatment of anteromedial facet fractures of the ulnar coronoid process. MethodsBetween February 2007 and February 2012,16 cases of anteromedial facet fractures of the ulnar coronoid process were treated with operation.There were 9 males and 7 females,aged 20-80 years (mean,43.5 years).The causes of injury were traffic accident injury in 7 cases,tumble injury in 5 cases,and falling injury from height in 4 cases.The time from injury to operation was 6.8 days on average (range,2-8 days).All cases had closed fractures.According to O'Driscoll classification,there were 4 cases of type Ⅱ a,7 cases of type Ⅱ b,and 5 cases of type Ⅱ c.Among 16 patients,7 had simple anteromedial facet fractures of the ulnar coronoid process,and 9 had associated injury,including terrible triad in 3,Monteggia fractures in 4,and olecranon fractures in 2.All fractures were fixed with non-absorbable suture in 10 cases,and with suture anchor in 6 cases.The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS),range of motion (ROM),and complications were used to assess the elbow function. ResultsThe incisions all healed by first intension,without neurovascular injury.Fifteen patients were followed up 10-48 months (mean,25.3 months).The X-ray films showed that all fractures healed,with the mean healing time of 17.5 weeks (range,11-30 weeks).At last follow-up,the mean MEPS score was 88.5(range,55-100);the results were excellent in 10 cases,good in 3 cases,fair in 1 case,and poor in 1 case,with an excellent and good rate of 86.7%.The mean ROM of flexion and extension was 118°(range,35-145°),and the mean ROM of forearm rotation was 138°(range,85-165°).One case had elbow instability,and 3 had slight pain.No heterotopic ossification and traumatic arthritis occurred during the follow-up. ConclusionThe anteromedial facet fractures of the ulnar coronoid process can be clearly exposed through anterior approach,and the fracture fixation using non-absorbable suture and suture anchor fixation usually can restore the elbow function.
ObjectiveTo investigate the advantages and effectiveness of anterior neurovascular interval approach for fixation of ulna coronoid process fracture. MethodsBetween February 2011 and April 2015, 8 patients with ulna coronoid process fracture were treated with open reduction and internal fixation by anterior neurovascular interval approach. There were 5 males and 3 females, aged from 14 to 62 years (mean, 34 years). Fractures were caused by falling in 5 cases, traffic accident in 2 cases, and crashing in 1 case. The time between injury and operation was 1-6 days (mean, 3.5 days). According to Adams classification, there were 4 cases of type II, 1 case of type III, 2 cases of type IV, and 1 case of type V. In 1 patient with joint instability, lateral collateral ligament repair was given through another incision after fixation of coroniod fracture and the hinged external fixator, and plast splin was used to fix in the other patients; function exercise was done after removal of external fixtion. ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention, and no complications of neurovascular injury and deep infection occurred. All patients were followed up 6-48 months (mean, 22 months). The healing time of fracture was 8-15 weeks (mean, 12.6 weeks). Mild myositis ossificans occurred in 1 case. The flexionextension arc of the elbow was (125.00±7.07)° and the forearm rotation was (135.00±7.07)°, showing no significant difference when compared with those of normal side[(126.88±7.53)° and (139.38±8.21)°] (t=0.469, P=0.654; t=2.198, P=0.054). According to Morrey's scale, the results were excellent in 6 cases, good in 2 cases; the excellent and good rate was 100%. ConclusionAnterior neurovascular interval approach for reduction and internal fixation of ulna coroniod fractures has the advantages of simple operation, less trauma, and larger operative field. It can be used alone or combined with other surgical approaches.
Objective To observe the effectiveness of reduction and fixation by the improved elbow anteromedial approach in treatment of ulna coronoid process fracture. Methods Between January 2010 and December 2014, 13 patients with the ulna coronoid process fracture were treated with reduction and fixation by the improved elbow anteromedial approach. There were 10 males and 3 females with an average age of 37.2 years (range, 18-57 years). Five cases were caused by traffic accident, 7 cases by falling injury from height, and 1 case by object impact injury. Seven cases were the terrible triad of the elbow, 4 cases were the ulna coronoid process and radial head fractures, 1 case was the proximal radius and ulna fractures, and 1 case was the ulna coronoid process and distal radius fractures. According to Regan-Morrey classification criteria, the ulna coronoid process fracture was rated as type Ⅱ in 2 cases and as type Ⅲ in 11 cases. According to O’Driscoll classification criteria, 10 of the 13 cases were anterior coronoid fracture (8 cases of type Ⅱb, 2 of type Ⅱc), and 3 of basal fracture. The operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, range of motion (ROM) of the elbow joint, Mayo elbow function index (MEPI) score and fracture healing time were recorded. Results The average operation time was 38.7 minutes (range, 30-55 minutes), and the average amount of intraoperative bleeding was 109.3 mL (range, 90-160 mL). All incisions healed at stage Ⅰ. There was no iatrogenic vascular or nerve injury. All patients were followed up 13-24 months (mean, 16.9 months). All fractures achieved clinical healing. The average healing time was 11.2 weeks (range, 8-16 weeks). There were 2 cases of heterotopic ossification. At last follow-up, the ROM of elbow flexion was 119-145° (mean, 132.4°); the ROM of elbow extension was –8-15° (mean, 7°). The ROM of forearm pronation was 68-90° (mean, 78.6°), and the ROM of forearm supination was 76-90° (mean, 84.3°). At last follow-up, the MEPI score was 70-100; and 9 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 1 case was fair. The excellent and good rate was 92.3%. Conclusion Improved elbow anteromedial approach for the ulna coronoid process fracture can not only avoid the injuries of surrounding blood vessels and nerves, but also perform fracture reduction and fixation under direct vision. It is a safe, simple, and effective treatment method for the ulna coronoid process fracture.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of a modified anteromedial approach in the treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture.MethodsBetween February 2017 and July 2018, 15 patients with ulna coronoid process fracture were reviewed. There were 9 males and 6 females, with an average age of 42.3 years (range, 24-60 years). The causes of injury included falling in 10 cases and traffic accidents in 5 cases, all cases were closed injury. According to the O’Driscoll classification, there were 4 cases of type Ⅰ, 6 cases of type Ⅱ, and 5 cases of type Ⅲ. The time from injury to operation was 2-8 days (mean, 3.7 days). All fractures were treated via a modified anteromedial approach between the pronator teres and the flexor carpi radialis plus with partial incision of flexor tendon aponeurosis. The fracture healing, muscle strength of forearm, postoperative complications were observed. At last follow-up, the elbow mobility were measured, the function of elbow was evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS).ResultsAll cases were followed up 10-18 months (mean, 13.3 months). Fracture union was achieved in all patients with a mean time of 10 weeks (range, 8-14 weeks). No obvious decrease of hand grip strength, nerve injury, and infection occurred. One patient had slight heterotopic ossification without special treatment. At last follow-up, all patients had stable elbows with good flexion-extension and varus-valgus stability, the mean flexion was 123.3° (range, 100°-140°), mean extension loss compared with that before operation was 6.7° (range, 0°-20°), mean pronation was 76.0° (range, 60°-85°), and mean supination was 75.8° (range, 55°-90°). The MEPS score was 65-100 (mean, 90.3) with the result of excellent in 10 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 1 case.ConclusionThe treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture via the modified anteromedial approach provides excellent exposure, minimal invasion, fewer complications, and satisfactory prognosis, which is conducive to elbow joint function recovery.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of transosseous tunnel fixation and drilling fixation for repair of lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) in treatment of terrible triad of elbow (TTE).MethodsA clinical data of 50 patients with TTE between June 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The LCLC was repaired with transosseous tunnel fixation in 22 patients (transosseous tunnel fixation group) and with drilling fixation in 28 patients (drilling fixation group). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in gender, age, fracture side, time from injury to admission, coronoid process fracture classification, radial head fracture classification, and TTE classification. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications of the two groups were recorded. At last follow-up, the Mayo elbow performance system (MEPS) score, range of motion of elbow joint, and Broberg-Morrey classification were recorded.ResultsThe operation of two groups were successfully completed. There was no significant difference in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two group (P>0.05). The follow-up time was (24.43±6.84) months in the transosseous tunnel fixation group and (21.55±6.16) months in the drilling fixation group, and the difference was not significant (t=1.534, P=0.132). X-ray films showed that the coronoid process and radial head fractures in the two groups healed, and there was no significant difference in the healing time (P>0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the flexion-extension activity, rotation activity, MEPS score, and Broberg-Morrey grading (P>0.05). During the follow-up, there was no re-dislocation or instability of the elbow joint. The incidence of complication was 28.57% (8/28) in the transosseous tunnel fixation group and 27.27% (6/22) in the drilling fixation group, showing no significant difference (χ2=2.403, P=0.121).ConclusionBoth transosseous tunnel fixation and drilling fixation can achieve good results in repair of LCLC for TTE.