Objective To analyze the causes and treatment of off target of the distal interlocking screws when short cephalomeduallry nails were installed through jig-guided targeting device, and to put forward the technical points to prevent off target. Methods Retrospective analysis of 9 patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated between July 2014 and June 2023 was conducted, in which off target occurred during the insertion of the distal interlocking screw by jig-guided targeting device in short cephalomedullary nailling (<24 cm). There were 1 male and 8 females, with an average age of 82.7 years (range, 73-94 years). There were 3 cases of type A1, 5 cases of type A2, and 1 case of type A3 according to 2018-AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) fracture classification. As for the misaligned distal interlocking screw, six parameters were collected and analyzed, including the time of finding, the position, the type of passing through the cortical bone, the special circumstances during operation (such as the need to remove the intramedullary nail for reaming the diaphysis, hammering, etc.), the treatment, and the patient follow-up results. Results In the 9 patients, the off target of the distal interlocking screw was found in 7 cases during operation and in 2 cases after operation; the locking screw was located behind the nail in 7 cases and in front of the nail in 2 cases; the off target locking screw was passing tangentially in transcortical patern in 6 cases and in bicortical pattern through the medullary cavity in 3 cases. Three cases were attributed to the mismatch between the nail and the femur, two of which were attributed to the narrow femoral medullary cavity, one of which was attributed to the large anterolateral femoral bowing, and the other 6 cases were attributed to technical errors such as the loosening of the jig-guided targeting device, the tension of the fascia lata, and the blunt of the drill. In the 7 cases found during operation, the misaligned interlocking screw was removed first and the screw hole was left vacant, then in 2 cases, the interlocking screw was not used further; in 1 case, the distal dynamic hole was successfully inserted with a dynamic guide frame, and in 4 cases, the interlocking screw was successfully put after 2-3 attempts, leaving a large hole in the lateral cortex. No special treatment was performed in 2 cases found after operation. One patient was out of bed early after operation, 7 patients were in bed for 1 month, and 1 patient deteriorated to A3 type after operation and was in bed for 3 months. All the 9 patients were followed up 6-12 months, with an average of 8 months. Fracture healing was achieved in 8 patients. One patient with vacant interlocking screw had a secondary spiral fracture of the femoral shaft 3 months later, and was refixed with a long cephalomedullary nail and circlage wiring. Conclusion Distal interlocking screw off target is rare, but when it occurs, it leaves a large cortical hole in the osteoporotic femoral shaft, reducing bone strength; the use of precision instruments and attention to technical details can reduce this adverse phenomenon.