Objective To summarize the clinical experience of da Vinci surgical system in treatment for senile patients with severe obstructive jaundice．Methods From January 2009 to May 2011, 209 patients with hepatopancreatobiliary （HPB） diseases underwent robotic surgeries by using da Vinci surgical system. Forty-seven senile patients with severe obstructive jaundice were selected for robotic surgery （robot group） and 44 for open surgery（open group）.The distribution of disease, pro-, intra-, and post-operative data in the two groups were analyzed. Results Baseline of two groups was same. A total of 46 patients had underwent total robotic surgeries （97.87%，46/47） and 1 patient converted to hand-assisted procedure （2.13%，1/47）. Surgeries included all HPB difficult surgical procedures, also including 1 case of hilar cholangiocarcinoma patient who had high level serum bilirubin （375μmol/L）and underwent emergency resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma and portal-jejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis． Postoperative complications occurred in 7 cases （14.89%, 7/47） and 1 case died （2.13%, 1/47） . Three-month survival rate was 78.15%. Fifteen-day and 3-month after surgery, physical strength score was 42.87±18.61 and 58.51±23.86, respectively. The total length of abdominal incision was （6.30±1.70） cm. All the patients in the open group completed surgery, including emergency operation in 4 cases. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 cases （29.55%, 13/44） and 2 cases died （4.55%, 2/44）.Three-month survival rate was 72.36%. Fifteen-day and 3-month after surgery, physical strength score was 37.15±13.64 and 45.27±18.96, respectively. The total length of abdominal incision was （26.73±3.07） cm. There were significant differences of postoperative complications, postoperative 15-day and 3-month physical strength score, and incision length between two groups（P＜0.05）. Conclusions da Vinci surgical system is safe and effective in treatment for senile patients with severe obstructive jaundice.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience of 180 general surgeries under da Vinci surgical system. MethodsFrom January 2009 to October 2010, 180 patients with hepatopancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal disease underwent robotic surgeries by using da Vinci surgical system. The case distribution, intra-and post-operative data were analyzed. ResultsA total of 171 patients had underwent total robotic surgeries and nine patients converted to hand-assisted procedure (5.0%, 9/180). The surgery for hepatic portal was performed in 63 cases of patients, including surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma in 36 cases, gallbladder carcinoma in 10 cases, complex calculus of intrahepatic duct in 12 cases, and iatrogenic biliary duct injury in 5 cases. The pancreatic surgery was performed in 44 cases of patients, including pancreatoduodenectomy in 16 cases, distal pancreatectomy in 6 cases, medial pancreatectomy in 1 case, pancreatic cyst-jejunum anastomosis in 1 case, and palliative surgery in 20 cases. Hepatic surgery was in 19 cases and gastrointestinal surgery in 12 cases of patients. Other procedures were in 42 cases of patients, including common bile duct exploration and removing the stone, retroperitoneal lymph nodes dissection, and splenectomy, etc. All of ten cases of patients with obstructive suppurative cholangitis received emergency surgery by the robot and postoperative infection symptoms were controlled, and shock was corrected quickly. No death occurred during the perioperative period. Postoperative complications occurred in 12 cases (6.7%, 12/180) and 2 cases died (1.1%, 2/180). Conclusionsda Vinci surgical system can carry out all kinds of general surgery, especially complicated and difficult hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, which improves the development of minimally invasive surgery.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience of 58 operations for biliary malignant tumor with da Vinci surgical system. MethodsFrom January 2009 to October 2010, 180 patients with hepatopancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal disease underwent robotic surgeries by using da Vinci surgical system, including 58 patients with biliary malignant tumor. The case distribution, intra and postoperative data were analyzed. ResultsOf 58 patients, 3 patients with intrahepatic bile duct cystadenocarcinoma received wedge resections of liver. In 36 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, anatomical left hemihepatectomies were performed in 3 cases, resection of extrahepatic duct and gallbladder bridge type biliary revascularization in 3 cases, resection of extrahepatic duct and biliary-enteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis in 14 cases, tumor resection and revascularization of hepatic portal bile duct in 1 case, palliative external drainage of intrahepatic bile duct in 5 cases, and Y-internal drainage of hepatic portal in 10 cases. In 10 patients with gallbladder carcinoma, resection of extrahepatic duct and gallbladder and biliaryenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis in 2 cases, cholecystectmy in 3 cases, cholecystectmy and external drainage of intrahepatic bile duct in 1 case, cholecystectmy and Y-internal drainage by suspension of hepatic portal in 4 cases. A patient with middle bile duct cancer received radical resection of cholangiocarcinoma and biliary-enteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Of 8 patients with distal bile duct cancer, Whipple procedure were performed. Of 58 patients, 2 cases converted to hand-assistant procedure (3.4%). For all patients, operation time was (6.18±1.71) h, blood loss was (116.66±56.06) ml, blood transfusion was (85.55±38.28) ml, ambulation time was (9.10±2.91) h, feeding time was (14.95±4.35) h, and hospital stay was (12.81±4.29) d. Postoperative complications occurred in 8 cases (13.8%), including bile leakage (3 cases), wound bleeding (1 case), pancreatoenteric anastomotic leakage (2 cases), pulmonary infection (1 case), and renal failure (1 case). Of these 8 cases, 6 cases recovered smoothly and 2 cases die of severe pulmonary infection and renal failure after conservative treatment (3 or 4 weeks), therefore, the mortality of patients was 3.4%. In 36 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, 19 cases died (on 2 monthes 4 cases, on 6 monthes 5 cases, on 10 monthes 8 cases, and on 12 monthes 2 cases after operation), 11 cases survival well (gt;26 monthes 4 cases, gt;22 monthes 3 cases, and gt;19 monthes 4 cases), and 6 cases required hospitalization. Of 10 patients with gallbladder carcinoma, 7 cases died (on 3 monthes 1 case, on 5 monthes 1 case, on 8 monthes 1 case, on 11 monthes 3 cases, and on 12 monthes 1 case after operation) and 3 cases survival (gt;17 monthes 2 cases, gt;13 monthes 1 case). In 8 cases undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, 5 cases died (on 4 monthes 2 cases, on 6 monthes 2 cases, and 10 monthes 1 case after operation) and 3 cases survived well over 2 years. Three patients with intrahepatic bile duct cystadenocarcinoma survived over 1 year. Conclusionsda Vinci surgical system can carry out all kinds of surgery for biliary malignant tumor, especially prominent in the complicated surgeries for hepatic portal, which breaks through the restricted area of laparoscope in hepatobiliary malignant tumor.
ObjectiveTo review the current status of da Vinci surgical system in vascular surgery. MethodsRecent literatures published in Chinese or English about the application of da Vinci surgical system in vascular surgery were reviewed and analyzed. Resultsda Vinci surgical system was mainly applied in diseases such as aortoiliac occlusive disease, aneurysm, typeⅡ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair, celiac artery compression syndrome, and so on. It was used to expose arteries, or assist to ligate and dissect arteries. da Vinci surgical system showed apparent advantages in shorting the time of aortic clamping, however, the high cost, the loss of tactile feedback, and the long learning curve may be its shortcomings. Conclusionda Vinci surgical system is safe and effective in vascular surgery, while much more experience is required to evaluate its long-term effect and complication.
ObjectiveTo summarize the surgical learning curve and evaluate the effectiveness, safety and feasibility of the robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) by comparing with the conventional vedio-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).MethodsThe clinical data of 40 patients receiving robotic assisted thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection from March to June 2016 in our department were reviewed. There were 29 males and 11 females with the age of 54-78 (60.2±12.7) years in the RATS group, and 27 males and 10 females with the age of 52-76 (58.7±11.5) years in the VATS group. Lung space-occupying lesions were comfirmed by preoperative diagnosis. The operative time, blood loss, chest tube retention time, postoperative hospital stay and perioperative morbidity and mortality were analyzed. The safety and feasibility were evaluated, and the learning curve was summed up.ResultsOperative time, postoperative ventilation time, intraoperative blood loss, chest tube retention time, postoperative pain, average hospital stay, postoperative complication rate between two groups were not statistically significant. In the RATS group preoperative preparation time was longer than that of the VATS group (24.5 min vs. 15.6 min, P=0.003), and the rate of conversion to thoracotomy of the RATS group was lower than that of the VATS group (0 vs. 10.8%). There was no perioperative death in two groups.ConclusionRobotic-assisted thoracic surgery is safe and effective in the early learning process, and the learning curve can be entered into the standard stage from the learning stage after initial 10 operations.
ObjectiveTo present the initial clinical experience of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer and to analyze the short-term outcomes of these patients.MethodsBetween February 2016 and December 2017, 148 patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent robotic esophagectomy and two-fields lymph node dissection. There were 126 males and 22 females at average age of 62.0±8.0 years. Demographic data, intraoperative characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes were collected and analyzed.Results106 patients underwent McKeown esophagectomy and 42 patients underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. The mean operation time was 336.0±76.0 min, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 130.0±89.0 ml, the mean number of lymph nodes removed was 21.0±8.0 and the mean length of postoperative hospital-stay was 12.0±7.2 days. Postoperative complications included anastomotic fistula (n=8, 5.4%), pulmonary infection (n=13, 8.7%), hoarseness (n=23, 15.5%), tracheoesophageal fistula (n=1, 0.7%), chylothorax (n=4, 2.7%) and incision infection (n=2, 1.4%). There was no intra-operational massive hemorrhage or in-hospital mortality.ConclusionBoth robot-assisted McKeown and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy are safe and feasible with good early outcomes.
ObjectiveTo compare the perioperative results of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR), off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease involving left anterior descending (LAD) branch and explores the safety of surgery.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled patients with coronary heart disease over 65 years who were admitted to General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army from January 2018 to September 2019. Coronary angiography results were all three-vessel lesions involving the anterior descending artery. After preoperative examination and assessment by the cardiovascular team, all patients were suitable for OPCAB or PCI treatment. According to the patient’s preference, HCR, OPCAB or PCI were performed. The preoperative baseline data and perioperative results were collected, and SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 110 patients met the criteria and were included in the study, 28 in the HCR group, 45 in the OPCAB group, and 37 in the PCI group, with an average age of 71.4±5.6 years. There was no statistical difference in the preoperative baseline data of patients among the three groups. The intubation time (P=0.039), perioperative drainage volume (P<0.001), blood transfusion (P=0.021) in the HCR group were lower than those in the OPCAB group. There was no statistical difference in the main organ adverse events (MOAE, P=0.096) and in-hospital mortality (P=0.784) among the three groups of patients. The use of antibiotics in the PCI group was significantly lower than the other two groups (P<0.001).ConclusionHCR combines the advantage of CABG and PCI including proved long-term patency rate with left internal mammary artery-LAD grafting, less trauma and superior long-term patency with PCI in non-LAD territory. Compared with OPCAB and PCI, there is no increase in perioperative major organ adverse events and in-hospital mortality. It is a safe and reliable minimally invasive myocardial revascularization technique for elderly patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease involving the anterior descending artery.