Postoperative delirium is one of the most common postoperative complications in elderly patients, affecting the outcome of approximately half of surgical patients. The pathogenesis of postoperative delirium is still unclear, but multivariate models of the etiology of postoperative delirium are well-validated and widely accepted, and 40% of postoperative delirium can be effectively prevented by targeting predisposing factors. Benzodiazepines have long been considered as predisposing factors for postoperative delirium. Although benzodiazepines are widely used in clinical practice, most relevant guidelines recommend avoiding the use of benzodiazepines in the perioperative period to reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium. Controversy exists regarding the association of benzodiazepine use with postoperative delirium. This article discusses the results of studies on perioperative benzodiazepines and postoperative delirium.
Methods To explore the level of delirium knowledge of geriatric nurses in Sichuan province and analyze the factors, so as to provide the basis for systematic and targeted knowledge training on delirium and clinical management. Methods Using the self-designed “the Questionnaire of Elderly Delirium Knowledge”, geriatric nurses from 22 hospitals in Sichuan province were investigated through a convenient sampling method from September 2018 to February 2019. Results A total of 475 geriatric nurses were investigated. The average delirium knowledge score of the 475 geriatric nurses was 69.51±12.42. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the main factors affecting the score of delirium-related knowledge were the education of nurses (P=0.037), technical title (P<0.001), years of working in the geriatric department (P=0.001), and the level of working hospital (P=0.001). Conclusions The level of delirium knowledge of geriatric nurses is low and can not meet the needs of clinical work. Nursing managers should carry out delirium knowledge training according to the different characteristics of nurses.
Objective To investigate the prevalence of postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery and analyze its influencing factors, so as to provide evidence for early screening and intervention of POD. Methods The medical records of elderly patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery in the Department of Orthopaedics of the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected. The included patients were divided into POD group and non-POD group. The patients’ demographic characteristics, medical history, laboratory indicators, perioperative medication, intraoperative and postoperative indicators were collected to analyze the risk factors affecting POD. Results A total of 455 elderly patients were included. Among them, there were 75 cases in the POD group and 380 cases in the non-POD group. The incidence of POD was 16.5% (75/455). There were statistically significant differences in age, body mass index, number of combined underlying diseases≥3, albumin<35 g/L, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, intraoperative blood loss≥200 mL, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, indwelling catheters, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), and length of ICU stay between the two groups (P<0.05). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that age≥79 years, number of combined underlying diseases≥3, albumin<35 g/L, intraoperative blood loss≥200 mL, ASA grade≥Ⅲ, postoperative VAS score, and postoperative admission to ICU (P<0.05) were independent influencing factors for POD occurrence in elderly patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Conclusions POD is one of the common postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Age≥79 years, number of combined underlying diseases≥3, albumin<35 g/L, intraoperative blood loss≥200 mL, ASA grade≥Ⅲ, postoperative VAS score, and postoperative admission to ICU are independent risk factors for POD in elderly patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Clinical staff should evaluate and screen these factors early and take preventive measures to reduce the incidence of POD.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on delirium in elderly patients after taking gastric cancer surgery.MethodsA prospective study was conducted. Elderly patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2015 to June 2018 were divided into experimental group and control group for the purpose of research. All patients were operated by the same group of surgeons and anesthesiologists. Patients in the experimental group received intravenous infusion of 10% fish fat emulsion (Ewing) 100 mL daily from the first day after operation extra to routine treatment; patients in the control group received routine treatment after operation. The postoperative delirium, inflammation, complications, hospital stay, andre-admission on 30 days were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 205 patients were under research. The results were as follows. ① There were 47 delirium patients in the control group and 22 delirium patients in the experimental group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.001). There were 32 cases and 19 cases discovered with delirium in the control group and the experimental group during 1-3 days after operation; there were 19 cases and 6 cases were detected with delirium in the control group and the experimental group during 4-7 days after operation, respectively. The difference was considered statistically significant (P<0.05). ② Inflammation indexes of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group on the 3rd and 7th day after operation, including count of WBC, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and platelet crit, and the difference were statistically significant (P<0.05). ③ Postoperative fever occurred in 46 patients in the experimental group, while 71 patients in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). ④ There were 2 cases of incision liquefaction in the control group and 1 case of mild chylous leakage in the experimental group. There was no significant difference in incision liquefaction rate and chylous leakage rate between the two groups (P>0.05). ⑤ The average hospitalization time of the experimental group was shorter than that of the control group ［(8±1) d vs. (9±2) d］. The difference was considered statistically significant (P<0.01).Conclusionω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids can reduce postoperative delirium and improve short-term prognosis in elderly patients with gastric cancer by controlling inflammation and stress response.
Objective To investigate the evaluation, risk factors and intervening measures of postoperative delirium in patients after liver transplantation, and to provide reference for clinical practice. Methods The relevant literatures on delirium after liver transplantation at home and abroad in recent years were consulted. Based on the definition of postoperative delirium, the research status, evaluation tools and evaluation frequency at home and abroad were reviewed. From the aspects of donor and recipient, the influencing factors by connecting preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative stages and angles were explored. Results The incidence of postoperative delirium in patients with liver transplantation was high, and the risk factors were numerous, which ran through before and after liver transplantation. In terms of research type, most domestic and foreign studies were retrospective, single center, small sample surveys, with different assessment tools and assessment frequency. There were few high-quality intervention studies on delirium after liver transplantation. Conclusions Delirium after liver transplantation is predictable, evaluable and treatable. Effective risk assessment and screening are very important. Intervention for patients undergoing liver transplantation who develop postoperative delirium requires a combination of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions.
ObjectiveTo determine whether there was a clinical relevant association between anesthetic regimen (propofol or inhalational anesthetics) and the occurrence of postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted on patients with elective cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between October 2018 and March 2019. The patients were divided into a propofol group or an inhalational anesthetics group according to anesthetic regimen (including CPB). The primary outcome was the occurrence of POD during first 3 days after surgery. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between anesthetic regimen and the occurrence of POD.ResultsA total of 197 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included, with an average age of 53 years, and 51.8% (102/197) were females. POD occurred in 21.3% (42/197) patients. The incidence of POD was 21.4% in the propofol group and 21.2% in the inhalational anesthetics group; there was no significant difference between the two groups (RR=1.01, 95%CI 0.51-2.00, P=0.970). Logistic regression analysis did not find that anesthetic regimen was a risk factor for delirium after cardiac surgery after adjusting risk factors (OR=1.05, 95%CI 0.48-2.32, P=0.900).ConclusionAnesthetic regimen (propofol or inhalational anesthetics) is not associated with an increased risk for POD in adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery under CPB.
Postoperative delirium (POD) is a serious postoperative complication, which is significantly correlated with poor prognosis such as prolonged hospital stay and increased rate of readmission. POD is the result of multiple factors, and intervention targeting at its risk factors can significantly reduce the incidence of POD. At present, POD prevention tends to be multidisciplinary and cluster-oriented, aiming at forming a process-oriented, whole-perioperative assessment and intervention path. However, at present, there are few studies on POD peri-anesthetic period intervention, and there are many controversies. All guidelines and expert consensus are also blank in this part, and further studies are needed to fill the gaps. This paper discusses the current prevention strategies for POD during peri-anesthetic period, guiding future studies and further improving the intervention strategies for POD during peri- anesthetic period, so as to reduce the occurrence of POD.
Objective To analyze the risk factors for delirium of the Stanford A aortic dissection patients after surgery. Method We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 335 patients with type A aortic dissection in Guangdong Cardiac Institution from January 2012 through December 2014. There were 280 males and 55 females. The average of age was 48.5±10.3 years. Delirium status of the patients were evaluated based on confusion assessment method for intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). The patients were divided into two groups including a delirium group and a control group. We tried to find the risk factors for postoperative delirium. Results There were 169 patients of delirium with a incident rate of 50.4%. One-way analysis of variance and multivariate analysis indicated that pre-operative D-dimer level (OR=2.480, 95% CI 1.347-4.564, P<0.01), the minimum mean arterial pressure during operation (OR=0.667, 95% CI 0.612-0.727, P<0.01), the postoperative ventilation time (OR=2.771, 95% CI 1.506-5.101, P<0.01) and the postoperative acute kidney failure (OR=1.911, 95% CI 1.065-3.430, P<0.05) were the independent risk factors for delirium of the Stanford A aortic dissection patient after surgery. Conclusion The incident rate of postoperative delirium of the Standford A aortic dissection patient is relatively high. Patients in this study with elevated pre-operative D-dimer level, lower intraoperative mean arterial pressure, longer postoperative ventilation and combination of acute kidney failure have a higher rate of postoperative delirium. Better understanding and intervention of these factors are meaningful to reduce the occurrence of postoperative delirium.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the risk factors for postoperative delirium after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. MethodsWe searched the CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang data, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, The Cochrane Library database from inception to September 2022. Case-control studies, and cohort studies on risk factors for postoperative delirium after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection were collected to identify studies about the risk factors for postoperative delirium after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. Quality of the included studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 15.0 software. ResultsA total of 21 studies were included involving 3385 patients. The NOS score was 7-8 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that age (MD=2.58, 95%CI 1.44 to 3.72, P＜0.000 01), male (OR=1.33, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.59, P=0.001), drinking history (OR=1.45, 95%CI 1.04 to 2.04, P=0.03), diabetes history (OR=1.44, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.85, P=0.005), preoperative leukocytes (MD=1.17, 95%CI 0.57 to 1.77), P=0.000 1), operation time (MD=21.82, 95%CI 5.84 to 37.80, P=0.007), deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) time (MD=3.02, 95%CI 1.04 to 5.01, P=0.003), aortic occlusion time (MD=8.94, 95%CI 2.91 to 14.97, P=0.004), cardiopulmonary bypass time (MD=13.92, 95%CI 5.92 to 21.91, P=0.0006), ICU stay (MD=2.77, 95%CI 1.55 to 3.99, P＜0.000 01), hospital stay (MD=3.46, 95%CI 2.03 to 4.89, P＜0.0001), APACHEⅡ score (MD=2.76, 95%CI 1.59 to 3.93, P＜0.000 01), ventilation support time (MD=6.10, 95%CI 3.48 to 8.72, P＜0.000 01), hypoxemia (OR=2.32, 95%CI 1.40 to 3.82, P=0.001), the minimum postoperative oxygenation index (MD=−79.52, 95%CI −125.80 to −33.24, P=0.000 8), blood oxygen saturation (MD=−3.50, 95%CI −4.49 to −2.51, P＜0.000 01), postoperative hemoglobin (MD=−6.35, 95%CI −9.21 to −3.50, P＜0.000 1), postoperative blood lactate (MD=0.45, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.75, P=0.004), postoperative electrolyte abnormalities (OR=5.94, 95%CI 3.50 to 10.09, P＜0.000 01), acute kidney injury (OR=1.92, 95%CI 1.34 to 2.75, P=0.000 4) and postoperative body temperature (MD=0.79, 95%CI 0.69 to 0.88, P＜0.000 01) were associated with postoperative delirium after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. ConclusionThe current evidence shows that age, male, drinking history, diabetes history, operation time, DHCA time, aortic occlusion time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, ICU stay, hospital stay, APACHEⅡ score, ventilation support time, hypoxemia and postoperative body temperature are risk factors for the postoperative delirium after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. Oxygenation index, oxygen saturation, and hemoglobin number are protective factors for delirium after Stanford type A aortic dissection.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the risk factors for postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing lung resection. MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched from the inception to November 7, 2024 for cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, and cohort studies on POD in patients undergoing lung resection. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the literature. RevMan 5.4.1 software was used for meta-analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the literature. ResultsA total of 12 studies were included, with 5 574 patients. The quality scores of the literature were all ≥6 points. Meta-analysis results showed that age (≥60 years) [OR=2.43, 95%CI (2.01, 2.93), P<0.01], ASA classification (Ⅳ) [OR=8.74, 95%CI (5.23, 14.61), P<0.01], history of diabetes [OR=12.81, 95%CI (10.45, 15.71), P<0.01], history of cerebrovascular disease [OR=3.00, 95%CI (2.46, 3.67), P<0.01], depression [OR=7.27, 95%CI (5.46, 9.67), P<0.01], squamous cell carcinoma [OR=4.79, 95%CI (1.83, 12.51), P<0.01], malnutrition [OR=5.25, 95%CI (3.35, 8.25), P<0.01], sleep disorders [OR=2.79, 95%CI (2.28, 3.42), P<0.01], and duration of one-lung ventilation during surgery [OR=1.32, 95%CI (1.11, 1.57), P<0.01] are all risk factors for POD, while high body mass index [OR=0.96, 95%CI (0.95, 0.97), P<0.01] is a protective factor for POD. ConclusionAge (≥60 years), ASA classification (Ⅳ), history of diabetes, history of cerebrovascular disease, depression, squamous cell carcinoma, malnutrition, sleep disorders, and duration of one-lung ventilation during surgery are independent risk factors for POD, while high BMI is a protective factor.