Objective To compare the early compl ications of carotid stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Methods Between January 2005 and December 2007, 63 patients with carotid artery stenosis were treated with CEA in 36 cases (CEA group) and with CAS in 27 cases (CAS group). There were 42 males and 21 females with an average age of 67.5 years (range, 52-79 years). The locations were the left side in 28 cases and the rightside in 35 cases. The carotid stenosis was 60%-95% (mean, 79%). The major cl inical symptoms were stroke and transient ischemic attack. The cranial CT showed old cerebral infarction in 24 cases, lacunar infarction in 22 cases, and no obvious abnormal change in 17 cases. The encephalon, heart, and local compl ications were compared between 2 groups within 7 days after operation. Results In CEA group, encephalon compl ications occurred in 3 cases (8.3%), heart compl ications in 2 cases (5.6%), and local compl ications in 5 cases (13.9%); while in CAS group, encephalon compl ications occurred in 8 cases (29.6%), heart compl ications in 1 case (3.7%), and local compl ications in 3 cases (11.1%). The encephalon compl ication ratio of CAS group was significantly higher than that of CEA group (χ2=4.855, P=0.028); and there was no significant difference in other compl ications ratios between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion CEA is the first choice to treat carotid artery stenosis.
Abstract: Objective To retrospectively compare the difference of the effects of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) between distal and proximal types of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Methods The data of 70 patients (including 44 male patients and 26 female patients, the average age was 46.2 years old, ranging from 17 to 72) with CTEPH having undergone PTE from March 2002 to March 2009 in Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. We classified them into two different groups which were the proximal CTEPH group (n=51) and the distal CTEPH group (n=19) according to the pathological classification of the CTEPH. Clinical data, hemodynamics blood gas analysis and so on of both groups were compared. Results There was no perioperative deaths in both groups. Compared with the proximal group, cardiopulmonary bypass time [CM(159mm](189.5±41.5 min vs.155.5±39.5 min,P=0.003), aorta cross clamp time (91.3±27.8 min vs.67.2±27.8 min,P=0.002) and DHCA time (41.7±14.6 min vs.25.7±11.6 min,P=0.000) were significantly longer in the distal group. The incidence of residual pulmonary hypertension in the distal group was significantly higher than that in the proximal group (42.1% vs.13.7%,P=0.013), while the incidence of pulmonary reperfusion injury postoperatively in the proximal group was significantly higher than that in the distal group (41.2% vs.10.5%, P=0.021). SwanGanz catheterization and blood gas index were obviously improved in both groups. However, the pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP, 67.8±21.3 mm Hg vs.45.5±17.4 mm Hg,P=0.000) and the pulmonary vascular resistance ［PVR, 52.8±32.1 kPa/(L·s) vs.37.9±20.7 kPa/(L·s),P=0.024］ in the distal group were significantly higher than those in the proximal group and the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood of the distal group was significantly lower than that of the proximal group (76.7±8.7 mm Hg vs.88.8±9.3 mm Hg,P=0.000). After operation, 70 patients were followed up with no deaths during the followup period. The time of the followup ranged from 2 to 81 months (32.7±19.6 months) with a cumulative followup of 191.8 patientyears. Three months after operation, 47 patients were examined by pulmonary artery computer tomography angiogram (PACTA) and isotope perfusion/ventilation scan, which showed that the residual occlusive pulmonary artery segment in the proximal group was significantly fewer than that in the distal group (isotope perfusion/ventilation scan: 2.2±11 segments vs. 4.7±2.1 segments, P=0.000; PACTA: 3.5±1.4 segments vs. 4.9±2.0 segments,P=0.009). The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and 6 minute walk distance (6MWD) in the proximal group were significantly better than those in the distal group (1.7±0.5 class vs 2.3±0.4 class; 479.2±51.2 m vs. 438.6±39.5 m, P=0.003). Venous thrombosis in double lower limbs reoccurred in two patients. According to KaplanMeier actuarial curve, the freedom from reembolism at 3 years was 96.7%±2.8%. Bleeding complications occurred in three patients. The linear Bleeding rate related to anticoagulation was 2.47% patientyears. Conclusion Although the early and midlong term survival rate of PTE procedure to treat both proximal and distal types of CTEPH is agreeable, the recovery of the PASP, PVR and 6MWD, and blood gases in patients with proximal type of CTEPH are significantly better than those in patients with distal type of CTEPH. On one hand, anticoagulation can singularly provide enough protection to patients with proximal type of CTEPH, but on the other hand, diuretics and pulmonary hypertension alleviation drug should be added to the treatment regimen for patients with distal type of CTEPH after the procedure of PTE.
ObjectiveTo observe the effects of endovascular radiation (ER) on the proliferation and apoptosis of medial smooth muscle cells (SMC) and to discuss the possible mechanisms of radiation in the prevention of vascular restenosis (RS) in rabbits after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).MethodsForty rabbits undergoing CEA were randomly divided into four groups (each group=10) and given a radiation dose of 0, 10, 20 and 40 Gy 32P respectively. Rabbits were killed on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 28th and 56th day after operation. The specimens were collected and histopathologic examinations were done.ResultsProliferation apparently occurred in the intima and media of carotid the lumen became narrow in the control group on the 14 th, 28 th and 56 th day after operation. While in the radiation groups, proliferation was apparently suppressed and the lumen was much less narrowed (P＜0.05). The apoptosis rate of SMCs and PCNA positive cells increased on the 3rd day after operation and reached the peak on the 7th day. There was statistical difference between the ER groups and control group (P＜0.01). The effects were much more evident in 20 Gy and 40 Gy groups compared with 10 Gy group (P＜0.01).ConclusionER may prevent RS by suppressing SMC proliferation and migration as well as inducing SMC apoptosis. The effects are positively correlated with radiation doses. SMC proliferation and apoptosis occur in the early period after balloon injury, while hyperplasia of intima and medial happens later.
Objective To investigate the influencing factors for restenosis after femoral endarterectomy in treatment of arteriosclerosis obliterans at femoral artery . Methods A total of 103 patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans at femoral artery who underwent femoral endarterectomy from Jan. 2012 to Jan. 2017 in our hospital were retrospectively selected as subjects of this study, to compare the clinical feathers between restenosis group and patent group, and then exploring the influencing factors for restenosis after femoral endarterectomy. Results Thirty-six patients (35.0%) suffered from restenosis after femoral endarterectomy. Patients in the restenosis group had a high proportion of high smoking and diabetes mellitus, and high level of low density lipoprotein than those corresponding indexes of the patent group (P<0.05). Results of Cox proportional hazard model showed that, diabetes mellitus 〔RR=3.338, 95% CI was (1.003, 11.113), P=0.049〕 and high level of low density lipoprotein 〔RR=3.311, 95% CI was (1.166, 9.397), P=0.024〕 were independent risk factors for restenosis after femoral endarterectomy. Conclusions Monitoring of high-risk factors like controlling blood glucose strictly and strengthening statin treatment should be done to reduce the risk of restenosis after femoral endarterectomy for patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans at femoral artery.
ObjectiveTo explore the short-term and long-term efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with carotid artery stenosis, and analyze the risk factors for occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events within 30 days after operation.MethodsThe clinical data of 326 patients with carotid artery stenosis who underwent CEA in the Second Department of General Surgery, Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University from January 2012 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to screen the risk factors for occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events within 30 days after CEA, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the predictive value of serum homocysteine (Hcy) and modified Rankin scale (mRS) score.ResultsAll patients underwent successful surgery. Follow-up results showed that the incidence rate of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events within 30 days after surgery was 6.7% (22/326), and the incidence rate of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events within one year after surgery was 11.8% (38/323). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that smoking history (OR=2.373), contralateral carotid artery stenosis (OR=4.669), preoperative mRS score≥3 (OR=2.550), and preoperative serum Hcy≥20 μmmol/L (OR=1.335) were independent risk factors for occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events within 30 days after CEA (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of serum Hcy level was 0.834 in predicting cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events within 30 days after CEA [95%CI was (0.769, 0.899), P=0.003]. The area under the ROC curve of mRS score for predicting cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events within 30 days after CEA was 0.697 [95%CI was (0.552, 0.842), P=0.009].ConclusionsCEA is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. The smoking history, contralateral carotid artery stenosis, preoperative severe neurological deficit, and elevated serum Hcy are independent risk factors for occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after CEA.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) or single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA).MethodsWe searched English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, Chongqing VIP, and relevant clinical trial registry platforms (searched from database establishment to January 2020). Cohort studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included to evaluated the use of DAPT and SAPT for patients undergoing CEA. Stroke, myocardial infarction, artery restenosis, and composite endpoint (stroke or myocardial infarction or artery restenosis) were used as effectiveness outcomes. Death and any bleeding event were used as safety outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 15.1 softwares.ResultsA total of 11 studies with 123 748 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant decrease in the risk of stroke [relative risk (RR)=0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.66, 1.01), P=0.06], myocardial infarction [RR=1.31, 95%CI (0.92, 1.87), P=0.13], artery restenosis [RR=0.55, 95%CI (0.18, 1.68), P=0.29], or composite endpoint event [RR=0.90, 95%CI (0.59, 1.37), P=0.62] for CEA patients with DAPT during the perioperative period compared with SAPT. The difference in mortality rate was not statistically significant between DAPT and SAPT for CEA patients during the perioperative period [RR=0.99, 95%CI (0.44, 2.22), P=0.97]. CEA patients with DAPT had a higher risk of any bleeding event [RR=1.64, 95%CI (1.08, 2.50), P=0.02].ConclusionsPerioperative CEA patients with DAPT are not associated with a lower risk of vascular events recurrence, but the risk of any bleeding event may increase. Therefore, SAPT during the perioperative period of patients undergoing CEA may be better than DAPT.
ObjectiveTo investigate surgical treatment strategies for diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD). MethodsFrom January 2003 to June 2013, 92 patients with diffuse CAD received complete coronary revascularization including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)and coronary endarterectomy (CE)in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University. There were 63 male and 29 female patients with their age of 52-81 (68.7±10.5)years. After CE and during follow-up, coronary CT angiography (CTA)was used to assess graft patency, and improvement of patients' cardiac function and angina symptoms were observed. ResultsTarget vessel diameter of the 92 patients was all larger than 1.5 mm after CE. Sixty-three patients (with 69 CE grafts)received intraoperative graft blood flow measurement, showing 59 grafts (85.5%)with satisfactory blood flow[blood flow 13-42 (23.4±12.7)ml/min, pulsatility index (PI)1.6-4.2 (2.1±1.1)]. Six patients (6.5%)had perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), and 4 patients (4.3%)died within 30 days after surgery including 2 patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock, 1 patient with low cardiac output syndrome and multiple organ failure, and 1 patient with massive cerebral infarction. Seventy-three patients (83%)were followed up for 6-108 (49.3±26.7)months after discharge, and 15 patients were lost during follow-up. During follow-up, coronary CTA showed graft patency of 83.9% after CE. Four patients (5.5%)died including 1 patient with heart failure and pulmonary infection, 1 patient of unexplained sudden death, 1 patient with cerebral hemorrhage, and 1 patient with lung cancer. Five-year survival rate was 87% after CE. Six months after CE, ejection fraction (EF)was significantly higher than preo-perative EF (55.6%±9.7% vs. 50.2%±10.5%, P < 0.05), patients' cardiac function significantly improved, and their angina symptoms were significantly relieved. ConclusionCABG with CE can improve coronary revascularization for patients with diffuse CAD, and short-and long-term results are satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy of one-stop carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) combined with carotid artery stenosis. MethodsThe clinical data of patients with CAD and severe carotid artery stenosis who underwent one-stop CEA and OPCABG in our department from March 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Before the surgery, all patients routinely underwent coronary and carotid angiography to diagnose CAD and carotid artery stenosis. All patients underwent CEA first and then OPCABG in the simultaneous procedure. ResultsA total of 12 patients were enrolled, including 9 males and 3 females, aged 58-69 (63.7±3.4) years. All patients had unilateral severe carotid artery stenosis, and the degree of stenosis was 70%-90%. The lesions of carotid artery stenosis were located in the bifurcation of carotid artery or the beginning of internal carotid artery. All patients successfully underwent one-stop CEA combined with OPCABG. The number of bridging vessels was 2-4 (2.8±0.6). The operation time of CEA was 16-35 (25.7±5.6) min. There was no death during the perioperative or follow-up periods. No serious complications such as stroke and myocardial infarction occurred during the perioperative period. During the follow-up of 6-40 months, the patency rate of arterial bridge was 100.0% (12/12), and that of venous bridge was 95.5% (21/22). Cervical vascular ultrasound showed that the blood flow of carotid artery was satisfactory. ConclusionOne-stop CEA and OPCABG can be safely and effectively used to treat CAD and carotid artery stenosis. The early and middle-term curative effect is satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical characteristics and the long-term results of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) in the chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients with unilateral main pulmonary artery occlusion.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 15 CTEPH patients with unilateral main pulmonary artery occlusion in Fuwai Hospital between 2004 and 2018. There were 11 males and 4 females aged 34.1±12.0 years at operation.ResultsThe mean circulatory arrest was 31.1±12.1 minutes. The ICU stay was 5 (2-29) d. The hospital stay was 15 (8-29) d. There was no hospital death. There was a decline in systolic pulmonary artery pressures (sPAP, 69.9±27.9 mm Hg to 35.1±9.7 mm Hg, P=0.020) after surgery. On postoperative V/Q scan, only 6 patients (40.0%) had significant improvement in reperfusion (≥75% estimated) of the occluded lung. There was no death during the median observation period of 49 months follow-up, while 2 patients had recurrence of pulmonary embolism.ConclusionCTEPH patients with unilateral main pulmonary artery occlusion represent a challenging cohort. PTE is a curative resolution in both early- and long- term results, although there is a high requirement of perioperative management and a high risk of postoperative complications and rethrombosis.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis, and to provide a more abundant evidence-based medicine for the treatment of CEA and CAS in patients with carotid artery stenosis. MethodsForty patients with carotid artery stenosis were randomly divided into CEA group and CAS group based on the operative indication. Patients in CEA group were given carotid endarterectomy treatment and those in CAS group were given carotid artery stenting treatment. Then clinical efficacy of the two groups were observed and compared. ResultsIn terms of the occurring rate of perioperative complications, cardiovascular events in 3 months after operation, and some major end events such as stroke, death and so on, the comparative difference between the two groups was of no statistical significance (P > 0.05). Through the followed-up visits of 12 months, the comparative difference between the two groups was also of no statistical significance (P > 0.05) in terms of the occurring rate of carotid artery restenosis and disabling or fatal stroke. ConclusionsFor patients with severe extracranial carotid stenosis under indication of operation treatment, carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are of equivalent clinical efficacy, and both of them are of high security, although further study with large-amount and evidence-based medical data in long term from multiple centers is still in need.