ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical characteristics and the long-term results of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) in the chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients with unilateral main pulmonary artery occlusion.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 15 CTEPH patients with unilateral main pulmonary artery occlusion in Fuwai Hospital between 2004 and 2018. There were 11 males and 4 females aged 34.1±12.0 years at operation.ResultsThe mean circulatory arrest was 31.1±12.1 minutes. The ICU stay was 5 (2-29) d. The hospital stay was 15 (8-29) d. There was no hospital death. There was a decline in systolic pulmonary artery pressures (sPAP, 69.9±27.9 mm Hg to 35.1±9.7 mm Hg, P=0.020) after surgery. On postoperative V/Q scan, only 6 patients (40.0%) had significant improvement in reperfusion (≥75% estimated) of the occluded lung. There was no death during the median observation period of 49 months follow-up, while 2 patients had recurrence of pulmonary embolism.ConclusionCTEPH patients with unilateral main pulmonary artery occlusion represent a challenging cohort. PTE is a curative resolution in both early- and long- term results, although there is a high requirement of perioperative management and a high risk of postoperative complications and rethrombosis.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) or single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA).MethodsWe searched English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, Chongqing VIP, and relevant clinical trial registry platforms (searched from database establishment to January 2020). Cohort studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included to evaluated the use of DAPT and SAPT for patients undergoing CEA. Stroke, myocardial infarction, artery restenosis, and composite endpoint (stroke or myocardial infarction or artery restenosis) were used as effectiveness outcomes. Death and any bleeding event were used as safety outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 15.1 softwares.ResultsA total of 11 studies with 123 748 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant decrease in the risk of stroke [relative risk (RR)=0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.66, 1.01), P=0.06], myocardial infarction [RR=1.31, 95%CI (0.92, 1.87), P=0.13], artery restenosis [RR=0.55, 95%CI (0.18, 1.68), P=0.29], or composite endpoint event [RR=0.90, 95%CI (0.59, 1.37), P=0.62] for CEA patients with DAPT during the perioperative period compared with SAPT. The difference in mortality rate was not statistically significant between DAPT and SAPT for CEA patients during the perioperative period [RR=0.99, 95%CI (0.44, 2.22), P=0.97]. CEA patients with DAPT had a higher risk of any bleeding event [RR=1.64, 95%CI (1.08, 2.50), P=0.02].ConclusionsPerioperative CEA patients with DAPT are not associated with a lower risk of vascular events recurrence, but the risk of any bleeding event may increase. Therefore, SAPT during the perioperative period of patients undergoing CEA may be better than DAPT.
Objective To summarize the early outcomes and clinic al experience of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (off-pump CABG) afte r off-pump coronary endarterectomy (CE) for patients with diffused coronary art ery disease. Methods From May 2003 to November 2006，83 patients with diffu sed coronary artery disease underwent CE without cardiopulmonary bypass and off-pump CABG. There were 61 males and 22 females with age ranged from 55 to 80 ye ars (65±7 years). There were 7 patients in Canadian Cardiac Society(CCS) an gina classⅡ,20 patients in class Ⅲ,and 56 patients in class Ⅳ. 36(43.4%) pat ients had history of myocardial infarction. Coronary angiogram revealed th at 5 patients had double vessels disease, and other 78 patients had triple ves s els disease with 16 left main stem disease. The left ventricular ejection fract ion(LVEF) ranged from 25% to 65% (51%±16%). One hundred and ten endarter e ctomies were performed in 83 patients totally which included 67 in left anterior descending artery(LAD)，9 in circumflex artery and 34 in right coronary artery . Twenty patients received onlay venous patch after CE in LAD and then grafte d by internal mammary artery (IMA) on the patch. There were 83 left IMA, 2 radia l arteries, others were great saphenous veins, the mean number of grafts was 3.9 ±1.2. Results There was no death in all patients. Intraoper ative graft flowmeter was used to check the flow in the grafts before chest cl osure. One hundred and one (92%) out of 110 grafts after CE showed a satisfactor y grafts flow(22±16ml/min) intraoperatively. Four patients had perioperative myocardial infarctions but none had hemodynamic changes. All patients discharged uneventfully. Seventyfive patients (90.4%) had 8 to 50 months followup with no angi na reoccurrence. Eight patients had coronary angiogram from 3 to 29 months af ter operation with all patent grafts to the CE coronaries. Conclusion Off-pump CABG with coronary endarterectomy is feasible and achieves surgical revascularization in patients with diffuse cor onary artery disease.
Objective To discuss the safety and validity of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients with severe right heart failure (RHF). Methods PEA procedures were performed on 36 patients in Fu Wai Hospital from January 2015 to April 2016. There were 28 males and 8 females, with a mean age of 46.56±11.85 years. According to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac function classification, 36 patients were divided into preoperative severe RHF group (grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ,n=28) and preoperative without severe RHF group (grade Ⅱ,n=8). Hemodynamic parameters before and after PEA were recorded and 3-18 months' follow-up was done. Results All the patients having PEA surgeries had an obvious decrease of mean pulmonary arterial pressure (from 49.53±13.14 mm Hg to 23.58±10.79 mm Hg) and pulmonary vascular resistance (from 788.46±354.60 dyn·s/cm5 to 352.89±363.49 dyn·s/cm5, bothP<0.001). There was no in-hospital mortality among all the patients. Persistent pulmonary hypertension occurred in 2 patients, perfused lung in 2 patients, pericardial effusion in 2 patients. No mortality was found during the follow-up period. All patients improved to NYHA grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ (WHO grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ), and only 2 patients remained in the NYHA grade Ⅲ (P<0.01). Conclusion The CTEPH patients having PEA surgeries had an obvious improvement in both their hemodynamics results and postoperative heart function, which in return could improve their quality of life.
The high incidence and mortality rates existed in chronic pulmonary thromboembolism(PTE), with considerable misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis rate. The prognosis for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension was poor with medical therapy. But the pulmonary thromboendarterectomy was well established.The postoperative pulmonary hypertension and reperfusion pulmonary edema are main complications and death causes. The key management after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy is important which decreases pulmonary hypertension , and prevents reperfusion pulmonary edema and re thromboembolism.
Objective To update available evidence on safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) versus carotid artery stenting (CAS) in treatment of carotid artery stenosis by a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods A comprehensive search was performed of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of science, WanFang, and CNKI databases (from January 1990 to July 2015), to collect articles and past systematic reviews, and then abstraced lists of recent scientific conferences which were related with safety and efficacy of CEA versus CAS in treatment of carotid artery stenosis. At last, Meta analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1 software. Results Fifteen RCTs enrolling 9 828 patients were included in the Meta-analysis. Compared with CAS, CEA was associated with a significantly lower incidences of any stroke or death within 30 days after surgery (OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.51-0.77, P＜0.05) and any stroke or death during follow-up, or ipsilateral stroke after 30 days of operation (OR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76, P＜0.05）, but associated with a significantly greater incidences of myocardial infarction (OR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.14-2.87, P=0.01) and cranial neuropathy (OR=18.28, 95% CI: 7.99-41.82, P＜0.05) within 30 days after surgery. Conclusion In comparison with CAS, CEA is associated with a lower incidences of stroke or death and a greater incidence of myocardial infarction and cranial neuropathy within 30 days after surgery, and was associated with a significantly lower incidence of any stroke or death during follow-up, or ipsilateral stroke after 30 days of operation. So the results of Meta-analysis support continued use of CEA as the standard method in treatment of carotid artery stenosis.
ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy of one-stop carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) combined with carotid artery stenosis. MethodsThe clinical data of patients with CAD and severe carotid artery stenosis who underwent one-stop CEA and OPCABG in our department from March 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Before the surgery, all patients routinely underwent coronary and carotid angiography to diagnose CAD and carotid artery stenosis. All patients underwent CEA first and then OPCABG in the simultaneous procedure. ResultsA total of 12 patients were enrolled, including 9 males and 3 females, aged 58-69 (63.7±3.4) years. All patients had unilateral severe carotid artery stenosis, and the degree of stenosis was 70%-90%. The lesions of carotid artery stenosis were located in the bifurcation of carotid artery or the beginning of internal carotid artery. All patients successfully underwent one-stop CEA combined with OPCABG. The number of bridging vessels was 2-4 (2.8±0.6). The operation time of CEA was 16-35 (25.7±5.6) min. There was no death during the perioperative or follow-up periods. No serious complications such as stroke and myocardial infarction occurred during the perioperative period. During the follow-up of 6-40 months, the patency rate of arterial bridge was 100.0% (12/12), and that of venous bridge was 95.5% (21/22). Cervical vascular ultrasound showed that the blood flow of carotid artery was satisfactory. ConclusionOne-stop CEA and OPCABG can be safely and effectively used to treat CAD and carotid artery stenosis. The early and middle-term curative effect is satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo summarize the etiology and prevention measures of carotid artery pseudoaneurysms following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and discuss the complications and prognosis of it performed surgery and endovascular treatment. MethodsThe process and experience of diagnosis and treatment of two patients with carotid pseudoaneurysm following CEA admitted in this hospital from January 2000 to March 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The related English literatures concerning carotid artery pseudoaneurysm following CEA in PubMed, SpringerLink, ELSEVIER, and ScienceDirect database were searched and then made a conclusion. Results①The incidence of carotid artery pseudoaneurysms following CEA in this hospital was 0.31% (2/641). These two patients were treated with surgery and endovascular therapy respectively, and both recovered well after the treatment.②Thirty-nine related literatures totally were collected, including 187 patients with carotid artery pseudoaneurysm. One hundred and forty patients were treated with artificial patches during CEA, and 36 patients suffered secondary infection in the surgical sites. One hundred and fifty-two patients were treated with surgery, while 33 patients were treated with endovascular therapy, the residual two patients were accepted hybrid surgery. The overall incidence of cranial nerve injuries, the incidence of 30-day stroke, and the incidence of 30-day mortality were 6.4% (9/141), 7.4% (12/163), and 2.7% (5/182), respectively. ConclusionsSurgical site infection is one of the important reasons which lead to carotid artery pseudoaneurysm following CEA. Aneurysm resection and carotid artery reconstruction is still the main treatment of the carotid artery pseudoaneurysm; endovascular therapy could be used as a choice for a part of the patients. How to reduce the perioperative cranial nerve damage and the incidence of complications such as stroke still need further to be studied.
Objective To compare the early compl ications of carotid stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Methods Between January 2005 and December 2007, 63 patients with carotid artery stenosis were treated with CEA in 36 cases (CEA group) and with CAS in 27 cases (CAS group). There were 42 males and 21 females with an average age of 67.5 years (range, 52-79 years). The locations were the left side in 28 cases and the rightside in 35 cases. The carotid stenosis was 60%-95% (mean, 79%). The major cl inical symptoms were stroke and transient ischemic attack. The cranial CT showed old cerebral infarction in 24 cases, lacunar infarction in 22 cases, and no obvious abnormal change in 17 cases. The encephalon, heart, and local compl ications were compared between 2 groups within 7 days after operation. Results In CEA group, encephalon compl ications occurred in 3 cases (8.3%), heart compl ications in 2 cases (5.6%), and local compl ications in 5 cases (13.9%); while in CAS group, encephalon compl ications occurred in 8 cases (29.6%), heart compl ications in 1 case (3.7%), and local compl ications in 3 cases (11.1%). The encephalon compl ication ratio of CAS group was significantly higher than that of CEA group (χ2=4.855, P=0.028); and there was no significant difference in other compl ications ratios between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion CEA is the first choice to treat carotid artery stenosis.
ObjectiveTo describe the effect of sequential pulmonary balloon angioplasty for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, who was accompanied with progressed pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy surgeries.MethodsFrom 2014 to December 2017, 7 patients were treated with a combination therapy of pulmonary endarterectomy and sequential pulmonary balloon angioplasty. There were 1 male and 6 females at age of 58 (43–59) years. A follow-up period of more than 1 year was accomplished. The result of right sided heart catheterization and ultrasonic cardiogram between and after the pulmonary endarterectomy or balloon angioplasty was collected.ResultsSeven patients were treated with a combination of pulmonary endarterectomy and sequential pulmonary balloon angioplasty, which included 1 patient of single pulmonary balloon angioplasty and 6 patients of multiple pulmonary balloon angioplasties. The balloon dilation times was 2 (2–6), and the number of segments during each single balloon dilatation was 3–5, compared with the first clinical results before the first balloon dilation, systolic pulmonary artery pressure [53 (47–75) mm Hg vs. 45 (40–54) mm Hg, P=0.042), mean pulmonaryartery pressure [38 (29–47) mm Hg vs. 29 (25–39) mm Hg, P=0.043], N terminal-B type natriuretic peptide [1 872 (1 598–2 898) pg/ml vs. 164 (72–334) pg/ml, P=0.018] improved significantly after the last balloon angioplasty. Heart function classification (NYHA) of all the 7 patients were recovered to Ⅰ-Ⅱclasses (P<0.05).ConclusionSequential pulmonary balloon angioplasty after pulmonary endarterectomy can further reduce the patient's right heart after load, improve the heart function for patients with progressed pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy surgeries.