Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of total enteral nutrition (TEN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods The databases such as Pubmed (1996 to June 2011), EMbase (1984 to June 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2011) and CBM (1978 to June 2011) were electronically searched, and the relevant references of the included papers were also manually searched. Two reviewers independently screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodology quality. Meta-analyses were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.1 software. Results Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 379 patients with SAP were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with TPN, TEN could significantly reduce the risk of mortality (RR=0.33, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.55, Plt;0.000 1), pancreatitis-related infections (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.50, Plt;0.000 01), required rate of surgical intervention (RR=0.43, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.82, P=0.01), and incidence of multiple organ failure (MOF) (RR=0.28, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.46, Plt;0.000 01). There was no significant difference in the nutrition strategies associated complications between TPN and TEN (RR=1.16, 95%CI 0.42 to 3.22, P=0.78). Conclusion Meta-analyses show that compared with TPN, TEN can reduce the risk of mortality, pancreatitis-related infections, required rate of surgical intervention, and incidence of MOF; and it will not increase the nutrition strategies associated complications. Consequently, TEN should be considered a better choice for SAP patients as early as possible.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of early enteral nutrition (EEN) support in the perioperative period of children with perforated appendicitis based on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). MethodsThe children with perforated appendicitis were collected as an observation group, who underwent EEN support treatment based on the ERAS mode from January 2021 to December 2022 in the Xuzhou Children’s Hospital. At the same time, the children with perforated appendicitis received conventional nutrition support from January 2019 to December 2020 were matched as a control group according to the principle of balanced and comparable baseline data such as the gender, age, disease course, pathological type, and body mass index with the observation group. The time of first exhaust or defecation and the hospital stay after surgery were compared. Meanwhile, the nutritional indexes [prealbumin (PA), albumin (ALB), hemoglobin (Hb)], immune indexes [immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgM, IgG], serum inflammatory factors [C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)] before surgery, on day 1 and 7 after surgery were compared. And the adverse effects were observed. ResultsThere were 40 children with perforated appendicitis in the observation group and the control group, respectively. There were no statistical differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, course of disease, pathological type, and body mass index between the two groups (P>0.05). The time of first exhaust or defecation and the hospital stay after surgery in the observation group were shorter than in the control group (t=3.234, P=0.002; t=5.582, P<0.001). The levels of PA, ALB, Hb, IgA, IgM, and IgG in the observation group were higher than in the control group on day 7 after surgery (P<0.05). The levels of CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α in the observation group were lower than in the control group on day 7 after surgery (P<0.05）. The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group [5.0% (2/40) vs. 22.5% (9/40), χ2=5.165, P=0.023]. ConclusionsFrom on the results of this study, EEN support based on ERAS during perioperative period of children with perforated appendicitis contributes to recover gastrointestinal function, correct nutritional status, improve immune function, and reduce inflammation, and which has a higher safety for children with perforated appendicitis.
Objective To research the effect of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) on promoting the postoperative rehabilitation of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies in order to decrease the incidence of postoperative complications and the days of postoperative hospital stay. Methods Forty patients with gastrointestinal malignancies in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from February 1st, 2009 to June 1st, 2009 were included and allocated to experimental group (20 cases) and control group (20 cases) randomly. Seven days parenteral nutrition was provided to them after operation. Compared with control group, ω-3 PUFA with a dose of 10 g was given to experimental group every day additionally. Blood samples were gained before operation, on the morning of day 2 and day 8 after operation respectively to measure hepatorenal and immune indexes. Temperature before and 1-7 d after operation, time of passing flatus to normal, postoperative complications and the postoperative hospital stay were recorded. Results There was no statistical difference in the baselines between experimental group and control group （Pgt;0.05）. The level of total bilirubin in experimental group was lower and the levels of NK cell and B cell in experimental group were higher than those in control group on day 2 after operation, there were statistical differences between them (Plt;0.05). The levels of ALT, AST and blood urea mitrogen in experimental group were lower and the levels of CD4+ cell and NK cell in experimental group were higher than those in control group on day 8 after operation, there were statistical differences between them, too (Plt;0.05). The time of passing flatus to normal and days of staying in hospital after operation in experimental group were shorter than those in control group, there were statistical differences between them (Plt;0.05). There was no statistical difference in postoperative average temperature and incidence of complications between two groups （Pgt;0.05）. Conclusions ω-3 PUFA has positive influence on the recovery of hepatorenal, immune and gastrointestinal function, and can shorten the days of postoperative hospital stay; but there is no effect on incidence of complications after operation.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of early enteral nutrition (EN) versus parenteral nutrition (PN) for esophagus cancer patients after esophagectomy. MethodsThe following electronic databases as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2016), Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched from inception to June 2016 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on comparing early EN and PN for esophagus cancer patients after esophagectomy. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 14 RCTs involving 2 275 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the PN group, the early EN group could improve postoperative levels of albumin (MD=1.12, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.20, P=0.04) and transferrin (MD=10.08, 95%CI 5.41 to 14.76, P<0.000 1), decrease the incidences of pulmonary infection (OR=0.36, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.53, P<0.000 01) and anastomotic leakage (OR=0.57, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.92, P=0.02), but there was no significant difference in postoperative level of prealbumin between two groups (MD=10.04, 95%CI -0.31 to 20.39, P=0.06). ConclusionThe early EN could improve the postoperative levels of albumin and transferrin, decrease the incidences of pulmonary infection and anastomotic leakage, but could not improve the postoperative prealbumin level.
Early enteral nutrition after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been shown to have beneficial effects on intestinal integrity, lower mortality and also on the patient’s immunocompetence. Even in critical patients after CPB, enteral nutrition should be reasonable to start early and also be supplemented by parenteral nutrition in order to meet energy requirement. We conclude that enteral nutrition is preferable in the majority of patients with severe hemodynamic failure, but gastrointestinal complication and hypocaloric feeding should be simultaneously noticed. This paper comprehensively described enteral nutrition’s protective mechanism and effects on digestive system, enteral nutrition’s implementing methods after CPB, and problems or prospects needing attention in execution.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the incidence and influencing factors of early enteral nutritional feeding interruptions in critically ill patients. MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect observational studies on the early enteral nutritional feeding interruptions in critically ill patients from inception to January 2, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 17.0 software. ResultsA total of 12 studies including 1 121 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of early enteral nutritional feeding interruptions in critically ill patients was 75.0% (95%CI 64.0% to 84.0%). Influenced by feeding intolerance, airway management, tube problems, radiological examination, and endoscopy, surgery and so on, interruptions of early enteral nutritional feeding frequently occur in critically ill patients. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that early enteral feeding interruptions in critically ill patients are affected by many factors, and the incidence is high. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of early enteral nutrition (EEN) on immune status of patients in intenseive care unit (ICU). MethodsA prospective control study was conducted from July 2011 to December 2012, and 80 patients after trauma and surgery were admitted to ICU. The Patients were divided into EEN group and normal enteral nutrition (NEN) group randomly. Enteral nutrition in EEN group began within 24 hours after admitted to ICU, while within 48 hours in NEN group. ResultsIn 80 patients, 78(37 in EEN group and 41 in NEN group) completed the end point. The baseline in two groups was consistent (P>0.05). The indicators of lymphocyte, IgA, IgG, IgM and CD4+, CD8+, natural kill cell and pre-albumin values in EEN group were higher than those in NEN group (P<0.05). The incidence of diarrhea (8.1%, 26.8%) and infection of wound (2.7%, 17.1%) in EEN were less than those in NEN group. The hospitalization duration in ICU in EEN group[(7.94±3.72) days] was also shorter than that in NEN group[(10.62±3.14) days]. ConclusionEarly enteral nutrition improves immune function and nutrition status in ICU patients; it also protects gut barrier function and reduces the ICU hospitalization duration.
Abstract: Objective To determine the effects of early enteral nutrition (EEN) on postoperative recovery in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Methods We included 100 elderly patients with esophageal cancer who were admitted at the PLA 100 Hospital between January 2006 and April 2010, and whose diagnoses were confirmed by pathological examination. The patients were divided into an early enteral nutrition (EEN) group and a parenteral nutrition (PN) group, with 50 patients in each group. There were 32 males and 18 females with an average age of 72 years in the EEN group. There were 30 males and 20 females with an average age of 69 years in the PN group. We analyzed the effect of the nutrition administration method on bowel function recovery, hospital stay, complication rate, and nutritional status one week after surgery. Results The anal exhaust time (45.3±12.7 h vs. 73.6±11.7 h), time until anal defecation (80.5 h±15.6 h vs. 140.1±13.2 h), and hospital stay (13.0±1.8 d vs. 15.2±3.3 d) in the EEN group were all shorter than those in the PN group (Plt;0.05). The rates of lung infection, anastomotic leakage, and cardiac complications in the EEN group were significantly lower than those of the PN group (Plt;0.05). One week after the operation, the serum albumin (ALB), peripheral blood lymphocytes, transferrin, and 24 h urea nitrogen (BUN) in the EEN group were higher than those in the PN group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition can promote metabolic function in elderly patients after recovery, reduce morbidity, and promote recovery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with preoperative oral nutrition supplement (EnsourceTM) in patients with rectal cancer and its effect on postoperative stress response.MethodsFrom January 2018 to August 2018, 80 patients with laparoscopic assisted radical resection of rectal cancer in our hospital were divided into two groups according to different perioperative management. Forty patients who had used enhanced recovery after surgery combine preoperative application of tumor total nutrition formula enteral nutrition solution were as observation group, while other 40 patients who only had used enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative as control group. We observed the stress response (mean systolic blood pressure, mean diastolic blood pressure, mean heart rate, mean blood oxygen saturation, pain score and fasting blood glucose) at 24 hours after surgery and the time of the first anal exhaust, complication rate, hospitalization time, and hospitalization cost after surgery in both groups. We also compared the early postoperative (on the second day after operation) nutritional status of the two groups like the levels of serum total protein, albumin and proalbumin.ResultsThe mean systolic blood pressure, mean diastolic blood pressure, mean heart rate, mean blood oxygen saturation, pain score and fasting blood glucose of the observation group at 24 hours after surgery were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05), while the total serum protein, albumin and prealbumin concentrations of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group on the second day after surgery (P<0.05). Postoperative hospitalization time and hospitalization cost in the observation group were also shorter or less than those in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the first postoperative anal exhaust time was earlier and the incidence of postoperative complications was reduced in the observation group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).ConclusionsERAS combined with preoperative application of tumor total nutrition formula enteral nutrition fluid (EnsourceTM) can reduce the postoperative stress response and the postoperative complication rate of patients with rectal cancer, and also improve the postoperative nutrition status of patients and promote the rapid recovery of patients after sugery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the protein intake of patients in the general surgery intensive care unit (ICU) and to analyze the factors, both hindering and facilitating, that affecting protein intake from the perspective of healthcare professionals. MethodsA mixed-methods approach was used in this study, including a quantitative study and a qualitative study. The quantitative study was use to assess the protein intake in the ICU patients. The qualitative study was used to analyze the perspectives of healthcare professionals via semi-structured interviews. In the quantitative study, 32 variables were analyzed, and the sample size was estimated to be 10 times the number of study variables. The qualitative study employed the maximum difference sampling strategy, with the sample size determined by data saturation. The multiple linear regression was used to identify the risk factors affecting protein intake achievement, with a significance level of α=0.05. ResultsThe quantitative study included 459 patients, with a protein intake of (0.739±0.552) g/(kg·d). Of the patients, 90 (19.6%) had a protein intake of 1.2–2.0 g/(kg·d), 11 (2.3%) had 2.0 g/(kg·d) or more, and 358 (78.0%) had less 1.2 g/(kg·d). The multiple linear regression analysis identified several risk factors influencing protein intake attainment, including male, higher body mass index, elevated blood glucose levels upon ICU admission, early initiation of enteral nutrition (≤48 h), nasoenteric tube placement, and the only use of enteral nutrition feedings. In the qualitative study, three key themes relevant protein intake attainment were identified from the interviews: inadequate infrastructure, healthcare workers’ factors, and patient-related factors. ConclusionsThe findings of this study suggest a substantial gap between the protein intake of general surgical ICU patients and the guideline-recommended intake. The study highlights patient groups at risk for inadequate protein intake based on identified risk factors. Future efforts should focus on improving the efficiency of protein supplementation, enhancing the nutritional status of patients, standardizing protein supplementation protocols, and increasing education for both healthcare workers and patients.