Objective To investigate the diagnostic significance of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) combined with BRAFV600E gene detection in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis of thyroid cancer. Methods Atotal of 140 patients with suspected cervical lymph node metastasis of thyroid cancer were collected as the research objects, and all patients were given ultrasound-guided FNAC and detection of BRAFV600E gene. The significance of the diagnosis was analyzed according to the gold standard after pathological examination. Results All the 140 patients underwent surgical treatment. For FNAC, the sensitivity was 63.6% (84/132), the specificity was 100% (8/8), the accuracy was 65.7% (92/140), the positive predictive value was 100% (84/84), and the negative predictive value was 14.3% (8/56). For detection of BRAFV600E gene, the sensitivity was 84.8% (112/132), the specificity was 100% (8/8), the accuracy was 85.7% (120/140), the positive predictive value was 100% (112/112), and the negative predictive value was 28.5% (8/28). For FNAC combined with BRAFV600E gene detection, the sensitivity was 90.9% (120/132), the specificity was 100% (8/8), the accuracy was 91.4% (128/140), the positive predictive value was 100% (120/120), and the negative predictive value was 40.0% (8/20). The area under curve of receiver operating characteristic for FNAC, detection of BRAFV600E gene, and FNAC combined with BRAFV600E gene detection were 0.818, 0.924, and 0.955, respectively. Conclusion FNAC combine with BRAFV600E gene detection improves the accuracy of neck lymph node metastasis in patients with thyroid cancer, which is worthyof performed.
ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic accuracy, sampling satisfaction, and safety of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) for thyroid nodules.MethodsThe databases of PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, and CBM were searched to collect the relevant studies on the diagnostic performance, sampling satisfaction, and safety of ultrasound-guided CNB and FNA for thyroid nodules. Revman 5.3 and Stata 15 software were used for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 24 studies involving 25 388 patients were included. Meta analysis showed that: compared with CNB, FNA had poor diagnostic accuracy ［OR=0.26, 95%CI (0.15, 0.46), P<0.000 01］, poor sampling satisfaction ［OR=0.20, 95%CI (0.12, 0.33), P<0.000 01］, lower incidence of total complications ［OR=0.28, 95%CI (0.16, 0.50), P<0.000 1］, and lower incidence of bleeding after biopsy ［OR=0.62, 95%CI (0.48, 0.81), P=0.000 3］. However, there was no significant difference in the pain score ［WMD=–0.21, 95%CI (–0.57, 0.15), P=0.26］ between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the accuracy of biopsy diagnosis of thyroid nodules with diameter less than 10 mm between the two groups ［OR=0.52, 95%CI (0.15, 1.81), P=0.30］, however, the accuracy of CNB in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules with diameter ≥ 10 mm was still better than FNA ［OR=0.26, 95%CI (0.12, 0.56), P=0.000 5］.ConclusionsCompared with FNA, ultrasound-guided CNB has a certain advantages in sampling satisfaction and the diagnosis accuracy of thyroid nodules with diameter ≥ 10 mm. CNB is better than FNA, but will bring higher risk of complication.