摘要:目的：探讨急性重症胰腺炎（SAP）早期不同种类液体复苏对其预后的影响。方法：应用随机对照的方法,分别对2007年12月~2009年10月同期入院的48例SAP患者,随机分成两组,试验组和对照组。试验组第一周内液体复苏采用晶体液和人工胶体（羟乙基淀粉）,对照组采用晶体液,其他治疗方法不变。然后统计其第一周死亡率、ARDS、多器官功能障碍综合征（MODS）发生率,对比两组患者呼吸频率、血氧饱和度和红细胞压积（HCT）差异,以及两组患者肠功能恢复时间、住院时间以及并发症发生率。结果：试验组的液体复苏较对照组显著改善SAP的各项指标（P＜005）。血清乳酸水平（15±05）mmol/L,红细胞压积(HCT)为（324±69）%,ScvO2为（817±152）%,病死率83%,MODS发生率333%,〖HT5”H〗结论:〖HT5”SS〗 SAP早期联合应用晶胶体进行液体复苏可有效恢复循环血容量和防止体液潴留,显著提高其治愈率。Abstract: Objective: To investigate the optimal strategy of fluid resuscitation in the early stage ofsevere acute pancreatitis.〖WT5”HZ〗Methods:〖WT5”BZ〗Fourfyeighs SAP patients who received treatment in our hospital from 12,2007 to 10,2009 were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=24) according to the different amounts of crystal and colloid inthe daily resuscitation,including crystal group,combined group(the ratio of crystal to colloid was 2 to 1).The levels of hematocrit(HCT),saturation of central vein oxygen ( ScvO2 ),serum lactic acid as well as the advent of negative fluid balance the amount of fluid contained in the third space,mortality rate and the incidence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS) in different groups were compared.〖WT5”HZ〗Results:〖WT5”BZ〗 Compared with crystal group,all the parameters were significantly improved in combined group(P＜005).HCT in the group of patients was(324±69)%,ScvO2 was (817±152)%,lactic acid was(15±05)mmol/L,mortality rate was 83% and MODS incidence was 333%. Conclusion:In the early stage of SAP,fluid resuscitation by a combination of crystal and colloid could effectively restore blood volume, reduce the amount of fluid contained in the third space and significantly improve the prognosis of SAP.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of restrictive fluid therapy combined with preoperative urination training during perioperative period in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods A retrospective study were conducted in 73 patients who underwent unilateral THA with liberal intravenous fluid therapy on the day of surgery between April 2015 and March 2016 (control group) and in 70 patients with restrictive fluid therapy and preoperative urination training between November 2016 and April 2017 (trial group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, weight, height, body mass index, primary disease, and complications between 2 groups (P>0.05). Perioperative related indexes were recorded and compared between 2 groups, including operation time; pre-, intra-, post-operative intravenous fluid volumes, overall intravenous fluid volume on the surgery day; postoperative urine volume per hour after surgery; blood volume; total blood loss during perioperative period; usage rates of diuretics and urine tube; the incidences of hypotension, nausea and vomiting, hyponatremia, and hypokalemia after surgery; postoperative length of stay; and the expressions of inflammatory factors [C reaction protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)] before sugery and at 1st and 2nd days after surgery. Results The pre-, intra-, post-operative intravenous fluid volumes and the overall intravenous fluid volume on the surgery day in trial group were significantly lower than those in control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time, blood volume, total blood loss during perioperative period, and postoperative urine volume per hour after surgery between 2 groups (P>0.05). The usage rates of diuretics and urine tube in trial group were significantly lower than those in control group (P<0.05), while the differences in incidences of hypotension, nausea and vomiting, hyponatremia, and hypokalemia after surgery of 2 groups were insignificant (P>0.05). The level of inflammation factors (CRP, IL-6) at 1st and 2nd days was significant lower in trial group than in control group (P<0.05), with shorter postoperative length of stay (t=–5.529, P=0.000). Conclusion It is safe and effective to adopt restrictive fluid therapy and preoperative urination training during perioperative period (intravenous fluid volume controls in about 1 200 mL on the day of surgery) following ERAS in primary THA. However, prospective studies with large-scale are still in demand for further confirming the conclusion.
Objective To study the effect of preoperative urination training combined with restrictive fluid therapy with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on postoperative urination in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. Methods A total of 150 patients who were conducted the unilateral TKA from March to May 2018 were divided into two groups, the trial group and the control group, with 75 patients in each group. The patients in the control group did not undergo urination training before surgery and were given liberal intravenous fluid therapy on the day of surgery; while the patients in the trial group received urination training before surgery and were given restrictive fluid therapy on the day of surgery. The pre-, intra-, and post-operative infusion volume and the total infusion volume on the day of surgery of the two groups were recorded; and the urination situation, urination time for the first time and the hospital days in the two groups were compared. Results The total infusion volume on the day of surgery in the trial group and the control group was (1 581.40±277.54) and (2 395.00±257.40) mL, respectively. After operation, in the trial group, there were 73 patients with smooth urinating, 2 with smooth urinating after inducing method, and none with urethral catheterization; in the control group, there were 66 patients with smooth urinating, 3 with smooth urinating after inducing method, and 6 with urethral catheterization. The urination time for the first time after operation in the trial group and the control group was (1.85±0.91) and (2.93±1.48) hours after back to the ward, respectively. These differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The hospital stay in the trial group and the control group was (5.86±2.48) and (6.28±1.60) days, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions Preoperative urination training combined with restrictive fluid therapy (the total infusion volume controls in about 1 500 mL on the day of surgery) in the TKA patients after ERAS is good for postoperation urination. It also can reduce the rate of postoperative urinary retention, and enhance rehabilitation.
The incidence of complications after radical resection of esophageal carcinoma is high up to about 20%-50%. The incidence of pneumonia, pleural effusion, tracheal intubation, anastomotic fistula and cardiac events is relatively high. Among them, pulmonary complications are the most common complications after esophageal cancer operation and cause the most perioperative deaths. Among the factors that influence the occurrence of postoperative complications of esophageal cancer, the amount of fluid infusion during and after the operation is closely related to the occurrence of postoperative complications. Moreover, in the environment of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), it is more important to optimize the postoperative fluid management of esophageal cancer. Restricted fluid therapy plays a more and more important role in patients undergoing esophagectomy. This review integrated the relevant research results and discussed the advantages of the restricted fluid therapy compared with other fluid therapy, how to control the restricted infusion volume and infusion speed and how to monitor and evaluate the infusion process and the selection of infusion types, so as to provide reference for clinical practice test.