Objective To evaluate the relationship between pattern of left ventricular dilation and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) by echocardiography. Methods A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted on 117 patients with age of 31-77 years and left ventricular end diastolic dimension≥60 mm treated in our hospital from January 2013 through May 2016. These patients were divided into four groups by FMR degree: FMR-None/Trace (FMR-N/T group,n=33), FMR-Minor (FMR-Mi group,n=37), FMR-Moderate (FMR-Mo group,n=34) and FMR-Severe (FMR-Se group,n=13). We analyzed their basic information and echocardiographic parameters including left ventricular dimension, volume, systolic function, spherical index, regional wall motion score index, tenting height and area of mitral vavle as well as anterior/posterior angle. Results The incidences of inferior/posterior/lateral myocardial infarction and basal myocardial dyskinesia/aneurysm increased with the increase of FMR degree (FMR-N/T vs. FMR-Mi vs. FMR-Mo vs. FMR-Se: 12.1% vs. 18.9% vs. 44.1% vs. 46.2%,P=0.001 and 12.1% vs. 27.0% vs.47.1% vs. 53.8%,P=0.005, respectively). The tenting height and area of mitral valve, anterior/posterior angle, regional wall score index of the left ventricle where the papillary muscle was attached to had a positive correlation with FMR degree (P＜0.05). Conclusion There is a relationship between regional left ventricular dilation and FMR. Evaluating and improving those parameters is very important when we choose the treatment strategy of functional mitral regurgitaion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of different surgical strategies for moderate functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) at the time of aortic valve replacement (AVR) on patients' prognosis.MethodsA total of 118 AVR patients, including 84 males and 34 females, aged 58.1±12.4 years, who were complicated with moderate FMR were retrospectively recruited. Patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment strategy of mitral valve: a group A (no intervention, n=11), a group B (mitral valve repair, n=51) and a group C (mitral valve replacement, n=56). The primary endpoint was the early and mid-term survival of the patients, and the secondary endpoint was the improvement of FMR.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 29.5 months. Five patients died perioperatively, all of whom were from the group C. Early postoperative FMR improvement rates in the group A and group B were 90.9% and 94.1% (P=0.694). The mid-term mortality in the three groups were 0.0%, 5.9% and 3.9%, respectively (P=0.264), while the incidences of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were 0.0%, 9.8% and 17.7%, respectively (P=0.230). Improvements of FMR in the group A and group B were 100.0% and 94.3% at the mid-term follow-up (P>0.05).ConclusionFor patients receiving AVR with moderate FMR, conservative treatment or concurrent repair of mitral valve may be more reasonable, while mitral valve replacement may increase the incidence of early and mid-term adverse events.
ObjectiveTo determine the clinical efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic regurgitation (AR) combined with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). MethodsThe clinical data of 13 patients who underwent TAVR due to severe AR combined with severe MR from March 2018 to September 2021 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, including 10 males and 3 females with a mean age of 72.54±2.35 years. The echocardiographic findings of all patients were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. ResultsSurgeries were performed successfully in all patients without intraoperative death or conversion to sternotomy. The operation time was 118.15±11.42 min, intraoperative blood loss was 100.00 (75.00, 250.00) mL, and the length of hospital stay after surgery was 9.00 (4.50, 11.00) d. The mean follow-up duration was 10.00 (6.50, 38.50) months, during which there were 2 patients with mild to moderate AR, 6 with mild AR, and 5 with no AR; meanwhile, severe MR decreased significantly (P=0.001) even without active intervention, including 4 mild to moderate MR and 9 mild MR patients. Compared to preoperative indexes, the left atrial diameter [46.00 (41.00, 52.50) mm vs. 35.00 (34.00, 41.00) mm, P<0.001], left ventricular end-systolic diameter [45.00 (36.00, 56.00) mm vs. 35.00 (28.00, 39.00) mm, P=0.002] and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (62.62±2.40 mm vs. 51.08±2.49 mm, P<0.001) showed a decreasing trend during the follow-up. ConclusionIn selected patients with severe AR combined with severe MR, TAVR alone improves AR and combined MR at the same time.
Objective To compare the mid- and long-term clinical results of mitral valve plasty and mitral valve replacement in the treatment of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). MethodsPatients with FMR who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from 2012 to 2021 were collected. The patients who underwent mitral valve arthroplasty were divided into a MVP group, and those who underwent mitral valve replacement into a MVR group. The preoperative clinical data, operative and perioperative data of the two groups were analyzed retrospectively, and the mid- and long-term follow-up results were compared. Results Finally 236 patients were included. There were 100 patients in the MVP group and 136 patients in the MVR group. The total follow-up rate was 100.0%, the longest follow-up was 10 years, and the average follow-up time was 3.60±2.55 years. There were 14 cumulative deaths in the MVP group and 19 in the MVR group. There was no statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P＞0.05). There was no statistical difference between the MVP group and the MVR group in the incidence of adverse events such as extracorporeal circulation time, aortic occlusion time, hospital stay time in the ICU, intraoperative blood loss, or hospitalization death (P＞0.05), but the time of mechanical ventilation in the MVP group was significantly shorter than that in the MVR group, and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.022).There were statistical differences in the left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic inner diameter, left ventricular end-systolic inner diameter and cardiac function grade between the two groups compared with those before surgery (P<0.05). The left ventricular ejection fraction in the postoperative MVP group was statistically higher than that before surgery (P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in the postoperative MVR group compared with that before surgery (P>0.05). The LAD in the MVP group was reduced compared with the MVR group, and the difference was statistically different (P<0.05). The recurrence mitral regurgitation in MVP group was higher than that in MVR group, and the difference was statistically significant（10% vs.1.5%, P=0.003）. The cumulative survival rate (P=0.605) and mortality from cardiovascular events (P =0.880) were not statistically significant in the two groups by Kalan-Meier survival analysis. Conclusion The safety and medium- and long-term clinical efficacy of MVP in the treatment of FMR patients were better than MVR, and the left atrium and left ventricle diameter are statistically reduced, and cardiac function is statistically improved. However, the surgeon needs to be well aware of the indications for the MVP procedure to reduce the rate of MR recurrence.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the differences in efficacy and outcomes between patients with functional mitral regurgitation (SMR) and degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) treated with mitral edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using MitraClip. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), CNKI, Wanfang database, and VIP database were searched in computer. Relevant literature from the database from its establishment to January 2024 was covered. Literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment for the included studies were performed independently by two researchers. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata18.0 software. ResultsFourteen papers were finally included, including 6 707 patients, including 4 161 patients in the SMR group and 2 241 patients in the DMR group. Meta-analysis results showed that patients in the SMR group had a higher 1-year all-cause mortality rate [OR=1.53, 95%CI (1.30, 1.81), P<0.01, I2=0%] and 1-year readmission rate for heart failure [OR=1.9, 95%CI (1.60, 2.26), P<0.01, I2=0%] after MitraClip treatment than the DMR group patients. Postoperative mitral transvalvular pressure difference [SMD=-0.47, 95%CI (-0.65, -0.30), P<0.01, I2=51%] was lower in patients in the SMR group than in those in the DMR group, and the incidence of subsequent secondary open-heart surgery [OR=0.41, 95%CI (0.20, 0.83), P=0.01, I2=0%] was lower in patients in the SMR group. ConclusionThe results of Meta-analysis showed that after MitraClip treatment, patients in the SMR group showed better efficacy in the short term, but the medium- and long-term efficacy was not as good as that of patients in the DMR group. The specific type of mitral regurgitation should be considered when choosing a MitraClip treatment strategy to more accurately predict efficacy and prognosis.
Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of mitral valve replacement combined with cryoablation Maze surgery in patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR). Methods From January 2014 to June 2020, patients with AFMR who underwent mitral valve replacement in our department were enrolled. They were divided into two groups, a cryoablation Maze group who received cryoablation Maze surgery during mitral valve replacement, and a non-cryoablation Maze group who did not receive cryoablation Maze surgery. The baseline data, surgical data, efficacy, and prognosis between the two groups were compared. Results Finally 85 patients were enrolled. There were 16 males and 24 females with an average age of 58.65±6.86 years in the cryoablation Maze group, and 24 males and 21 females with an average age of 61.29±8.30 years in the non-cryoablation Maze group. There was no statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P＞0.05). The aortic occlusion time and extracorporeal circulation time of the cryoablation Maze group were longer than those of the non-cryoablation Maze group with statistical differences (P＜0.01). There was no statistical difference in postoperative ICU retention time, ventilator assistance time, length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, drainage volume on the first day or occurrence rate of complications (temporary pacemaker application, electrical cardioversion, thoracic puncture drainage, hospitalization death) between the two groups (P＞0.05). At the time of discharge, postoperative 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month, the maintenance rates of sinus rhythm in the non-cryoablation Maze group were statistically different from those of the cryoablation Maze group (P＜0.001). Compared with the non-cryoablation Maze group, the decrease values of left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic diameter and pulmonary artery systolic pressure were statistically different (P＜0.05). Postoperative cardiac function grading of both groups was grade Ⅰ or Ⅱ, which was significantly improved compared with preoperative level, but there was no statistical significance between the two groups (P＞0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of adverse events during follow-up (P＞0.05). ConclusionCryoablation Maze surgery combined with mitral valve replacement is safe and effective in the treatment of AFMR patients, which is conducive to the recovery and maintenance of sinus rhythm, and is beneficial to the remodeling of the left atrium and left ventricle, the reduction of pulmonary systolic blood pressure, and the improvement of life quality of the patients.
Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) is mitral regurgitation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), whose left atrium (LA) is enlarged, the left ventricle is not enlarged or only slightly enlarged, the left ventricular ejection fraction is preserved, and the mitral valve itself has no apparent lesion. At present, the etiology, pathophysiology and mechanism of this disease have not been completely clear yet. Existing studies have found that the causes of AFMR mainly include AF, enlargement of LA and mitral annulus, destruction of mitral annular shape, inability of mitral valve remodeling to compensate for mitral annular expansion, and hamstringing of the posterior mitral leaflet by atriogenic tethering. AFMR is demonstrated to be associated with an increased risk of mortality and readmission due to heart failure. Therefore, it serves as a primary therapeutic target for patients with heart failure and AF. However, the optimal treatment of AFMR still remains controversial. Therefore, this article will mainly expound the current definition, etiology, pathophysiological mechanism, treatment, and prognosis of AFMR.