Objective To explore the effectiveness of rigid interlocking nails through the tip of the greater trochanter for fixation of femur shaft fracture in adolescent. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 23 adolescents with femoral shaft fractures treated between June 2011 and June 2015. Of 23 cases, 19 were male and 4 were female, aged from 13 years and 6 months to 17 years (mean, 15.2 years), weighed from 40 to 77 kg (mean, 53.5 kg). The causes were traffic accident injury in 13 cases, sports injury in 7 cases, and falling injury in 3 cases. Fracture located at the proximal 1/3 in 6 cases, middle 1/3 in 10 cases, and distal 1/3 in 7 cases; fracture was typed as transverse in 10 cases, oblique in 6 cases, spiral in 1 case, and comminuted in 6 cases. The course of disease was 3-17 days (mean, 6.2 days). At last follow-up, the leg length discrepancy, femoral neck shaft angle, femoral neck diameter, and articulotrochanteric distance (ATD) were measured on the X-ray films. Results Wounds healed in all patients, and no infection occurred. All patients were followed up 15-36 months (mean, 26.5 months). The patients had no pain and had normal gait, without lameness. The X-ray films showed bone healing at 5-13 months (mean, 6.5 months). No nonunion, delayed union, malunion of more than 5 °, or rotational deformity occurred. The removal time of internal fixations was 12-24 months (mean, 19.5 months) after operation. No heterotopic ossification, re-fracture, proximal femoral deformity, or femoral head necrosis occurred during follow-up. Two patients had early epiphyseal closure of greater trochanter, which had no impact on gait; leg-length inequality of less than 1 cm was observed in 2 cases. At last follow-up, the neck shaft angle, femoral neck diameter, and ATD of normal and affected sides were (131.7±6.3) and (132.9±7.8)°, (34.1±3.2) and (33.9±3.8) mm, and (27.8±9.2) and (26.5±8.5) mm, showing no significant difference between two sides (t=–0.24,P=0.86;t=0.18,P=0.92;t=1.03,P=0.49). Conclusion It is a reliable and effective method to use rigid interlocking nails inserted through the tip of the greater trochanter for the fixation of femur shaft fracture in adolescent.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of two surgical approaches in the treatment of type Ⅳ Pipkin fracture.MethodsThe clinical data of 15 patients with type Ⅳ Pipkin fracture treated surgically between July 2013 and June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different surgical approaches, they were divided into group A (8 cases, using K-L posterior approach) and group B (7 cases, using greater trochanter osteotomy approach). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, and interval from injury to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, fracture healing time, and complications of the two groups were recorded. Hip joint function recovery was evaluated according to Thompson-Epstein functional evaluation system.ResultsAll the 15 patients were followed up 1-5 years, with an average of 2.5 years. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (t=14.681, P=0.100); the incision length, intraoperative blood loss, and fracture healing time in group A were all greater than those in group B, and the hospital stay was shorter than that in group B, showing significant differences (P<0.05). In group A, 1 patient presented hip pain, clasthenia, and limited mobility after operation, 1 patient presented ossifying myositis, 1 patient presented osteonecrosis of the femoral head, 1 patient presented fat liquefaction of incision, and 1 patient presented sciatica, with a complication incidence of 62.5%. Postoperative hip pain occurred in 1 patient and ossifying myositis in 2 patients in group B, with a complication incidence of 42.9%. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (χ2=−0.735, P=0.462). At last follow-up, according to Thompson-Epstein functional evaluation system, the results in group A were excellent in 3 cases, good in 2 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 62.5%; in group B, the results were excellent in 4 cases, good in 2 cases, and fair in 1 case, and the excellent and good rate was 85.7%. There was no significant difference in good and fair rate between the two groups (χ2=−0.990, P=0.322).ConclusionK-L posterior approach is more convenient in the fracture treatment during operation, but it has greater trauma, greater vascular damage, and more blood loss. The greater trochanter osteotomy approach can better protect the blood supply of femoral head, shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and reduce postoperative complications. It is an ideal way in the surgical treatment of type Ⅳ Pipkin fracture.
Objective To report a new offset parameter for total hip arthroplasty (THA)—greater trochanter offset (GTO), and analyze the effectiveness and feasibility of this parameter based on clinical data. Methods The 47 patients who met the selection criteria and admitted between January 2016 and May 2020 were selected as the research object. The global offset (GO) was used as the offset parameter in preoperative design. Firstly, the test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability of GTO were analyzed based on pelvic X-ray films. The GTO reconstruction was defined as the difference between the operative side and the healthy side within ±5 mm, and 47 patients were divided into the reconstruction group and the non-reconstruction group. General data (age, gender, type and side of fracture, the interval between injury and operation), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Harris score, gait score, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were recorded and compared between two groups. Then, the GTO was used as the offset parameter in preoperative design of 21 patients (GTO group) admitted between June 2020 and December 2020. The pre- and post-operative clinical data were compared between GTO group and GO group to explore the feasibility of GTO for THA.Results Statistical analysis showed that GTO had good test-retest reliability (P<0.001) and inter-rater reliability (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in gender, age, type and side of fracture, the interval between injury and operation, preoperative VAS score, and LLD at 1 year after operation between the GTO reconstruction group and the non-reconstruction group, as well as between the GO and GTO groups (P>0.05). The Harris score and gait score at 1 year after operation, and difference of VAS score between pre- and post- operation in the reconstruction group and GTO group were significantly better than those in the non-reconstruction group and GO group, respectively (P<0.05). There were 23 cases (48.9%) in the GO group and 19 cases (90.5%) in the GTO group with GTO reconstruction, and the difference was significant (χ2=10.606, P=0.001). There were 25 cases (53.2%) in the GO group and 13 cases (61.9%) in the GTO group with GO reconstruction, and the difference was not significant (χ2=0.447, P=0.504). There were 34 cases (72.3%) in the GO group and 19 cases (90.5%) in the GTO group with LLD reconstruction, and the difference was not significant (χ2=2.777, P=0.096). Conclusion GTO has reliable test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability. GTO as a parameter of preoperative offset reconstruction plan of THA can obtain good reconstruction of offset and limb length, and obtain a good effectiveness.