west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "hip dislocation" 4 results
  • Impacting bone graft via surgical hip dislocation approach versus core decompression and bone graft for avascular necrosis of femoral head at ARCO stage Ⅲ

    ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of sequestrum clearance and impacting bone graft via surgical hip dislocation approach and core decompression and bone graft for avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH) at Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage Ⅲ.MethodsA clinical data of 60 patients (69 hips) of non-traumatic ANFH at ARCO stage Ⅲ, which met the inclusion criteria between October 2013 and April 2016, was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 24 patients (28 hips) were treated with sequestrum clearance and impacting bone graft via surgical hip dislocation approach (group A); and 36 patients (41 hips) were treated with core decompression, sequestrum clearance, impacting bone graft, and nonvascular fibular allograft supporting (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, affected side, type and stage of the ANFH, and preoperative Harris hip score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score between the two groups (P>0.05). After operation, the function of the hip was evaluated by Harris hip score, imaging examination was performed to observe the femoral head shape and evaluate whether the hip preserving success.ResultsThe incisions of two groups healed by first intention. All patients were followed up. The follow-up time was 12-48 month (mean, 25.8 months) in group A and 12-54 months (mean, 26.4 months) in group B. At last follow-up, 5 hips in group A were classified as clinical failure, femoral head survival rate was 82.1%, the median survival time was 43 months. While 19 hips in group B were classified as clinical failure, femoral head survival rate was 53.7%, the median survival time was 42 months. There was significant difference in survival curve distribution between the two groups (χ2= 4.123, P=0.042), and the surgical procedures of group A was superior to group B. In the two groups, the Harris hip scores at last follow-up were significantly higher than preoperative ones (P<0.05), and VAS scores were significantly lower than preoperative ones (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Harris hip score and VAS score at last follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05). All grafted bones got fusion according to the X-ray films, and there was no significant difference in the fusion time between the two groups (t=0.752, P=0.456). In group A, greater trochanter bone cutting were healed well; and the heterotopic ossification around the hip joint occurred in 1 case.ConclusionThe surgery of impacting bone graft via surgical hip dislocation approach and core decompression and bone graft can be applied to treat ANFH at ARCO stage ⅢA which was mild collapse and satisfactory effectiveness can be obtained. While for the patients of ANFH at ARCO stage Ⅲ B with severe collapse, the hip survival rate of the former is better than that of the latter.

    Release date:2019-05-06 04:48 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Mid-term effectiveness of surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement

    ObjectiveTo assess the mid-term effecitveness of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) treated by surgical hip dislocation.MethodsBetween April 2014 and August 2015, 15 patients (16 hips) with FAI were enrolled in the study and treated with surgical hip dislocation. There were 12 males and 3 females with an average age of 36.6 years (range, 22-59 years). Among them, 14 cases involved in unilateral hip and 1 in bilateral hips. The mean disease duration was 28 months (range, 4-120 months). Preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Harris hip score were 7.9±1.0 and 44.1±9.3, respectively.ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention. There was no main complication, such as vessel and nerve injuries and infection. All 15 patients were followed up 30-46 months (mean, 39.5 months). The VAS score was 2.5±1.6 at 3 months and 0.5±0.7 at last follow-up. The Harris score was 85.5±4.4 at 3 months and 95.6±3.9 at last follow-up. There were significant differences in two scores between pre- and post-operation and between 3 months and last follow-up (P<0.05). The satisfaction rate of hip function was 93.8% (15/16) at last follow-up. X-ray examination showed that there was no sign of impingment at the femoral head and neck and acetabulum forming site of the affected hip joint, and no complication such as loosening of internal fixator, nonunion of osteotomy, avascular necrosis of femoral head, and heterotopic ossification occurred during follow-up.ConclusionThe surgical hip dislocation is a safe and effective way to treat FAI in the mid-term follow-up, which can repair torn labrum and trim acetabulum and femoral neck.

    Release date:2019-05-06 04:46 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effectiveness comparison between impacting bone graft and rotational osteotomy via surgical hip dislocation approach for avascular necrosis of femoral head at ARCO stage Ⅲ

    Objective To compare effectiveness between sequestrum clearance and impacting bone graft and rotational osteotomy on the base of femoral neck via surgical hip dislocation approach for avascular necrosis of femoral head (ANFH) at Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO ) stage Ⅲ. Methods A clinical data of 24 patients (27 hips) with ANFH at ARCO stage Ⅲ, who met the inclusion criteria between June 2012 and November 2017, was retrospectively analysed. Of all patients, 12 patients (14 hips) were treated with sequestrum clearance and impacting bone graft via surgical hip dislocation approach (group A); and 12 patients (13 hips) were treated with rotational osteotomy on the base of femoral neck via surgical hip dislocation approach (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, and affected side, type, and stage of the ANFH between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time of each hip and hospitalization stays of each patient in 2 groups were recorded and compared. Imaging examination was performed to observe the blood supply around femoral head, healing of the osteotomy, and the femoral head collapsed. The function of the hip was evaluated by Harris score. Results There was no significant difference in operation time and hospitalization stays (t=–0.262, P=0.797; t=–0.918, P=0.411). All patients were followed up, the follow-up time of group A was 12-28 months (mean, 19.7 months), and the follow-up time of group B was 14-24 months (mean, 17.8 months). The Harris score in groups A and B increased significantly at 6 months and 12 months after operation when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between 2 groups at 6 months and 12 months (P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, according to the Harris scoring, there were 3 hips of excellent, 7 hips of good, and 4 hips of poor, with the excellent and good rate of 71.4% in group A; there were 5 hips of excellent, 7 hips of good, and 1 hip of poor, with the excellent and good rate of 92.3% in group B. Digital substraction angiography was performed at 1 week after operation and indicated that the blood supply around the femoral head was not destroyed during the operation. Imaging examination after operation showed that the osteotomy of the greater trochanter all healed in 2 groups and the osteotomy of the femoral neck healed in group B. Hip collapse occurred in 2 patients (2 hips) of group A at 12 months after operation. No hip collapse occurred in group B. Conclusion The rotational osteotomy on the base of femoral neck via surgical hip dislocation approach is superior to sequestrum clearance and impacting bone graft in delaying the collapse and improving the hip function for patients with ANFH at ARCO stage Ⅲ.

    Release date:2019-05-06 04:46 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Arthroscopic treatment of irreducible hip posterior dislocation caused by acetabular labrum bony Bankart lesions

    ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic treatment for irreducible hip posterior dislocation caused by acetabular labrum bony Bankart lesions.MethodsBetween February 2008 and August 2016, 11 patients with irreducible hip posterior dislocation caused by acetabular labrum bony Bankart lesions, were treated with arthroscopic reduction and fixation of bony Bankart lesions. There were 7 males and 4 females, with an average age of 23.7 years (mean, 15-36 years). The injury was caused by traffic accident in 8 cases and falling from height in 3 cases. The interval between hip dislocation and the first manual reduction was 2-8 hours (mean, 5.3 hours) and between the first manual reduction and arthroscopic surgery was 6-31 days (mean, 12.8 days). The preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) was 5.2±0.9, the modified Harris score was 32±8, and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was 30±5. ResultsThe operative time was 90-150 minutes (mean, 120.9 minutes), with no hip arthroscopic surgery related complications. All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 26-68 months (mean, 42.7 months). Postoperative X-ray films showed that all hip joints were reduction; CT showed that the reduction of posterior acetabular wall fracture was satisfactory. And all fractures healed at last follow-up with no avascular necrosis of the femoral head or osteoarthritis. At last follow-up, the VAS score was 0.5±0.5, the modified Harris score was 94±5, and the WOMAC score was 95±4. There were significant differences in those indexes between pre- and post-operation (P<0.05). ConclusionThe irreducible hip posterior dislocation caused by acetabular labrum bony Bankart lesions is rare. Arthroscopic therapy has the advantages of less trauma, quick recovery, and less complications.

    Release date:2019-06-04 02:16 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content