ObjectiveTo compare the effects of different airway humidification methods for patients with artificial airway offline. MethodsOne hundred and fifty-five critically ill patients with artificial airway who did not need mechanical ventilation for more than 72 h, admitted in the Affiliated Hospital to Armed Police Logistics College between January 2012 and December 2012, were recruited in the study.They were randomly divided into 3 groups to receive different airway humidification treatment, ie.MR410 device for group A, MR850 device for group B, AIRVO2 device for group C.PaO2, SpO2, heart rate, and breathing frequency were measured after 72 h.The Airway Scoring System was used for evaluation of sputum viscosity.The time of pulmonary infection control was also recorded. ResultsThere were no significant differences in gender, age, underlying diseases, duration of artificial airway, and APACHEⅡscore among three groups (P > 0.05).There were significant differences in respiratory frequency, PaO2, SpO2, heart rate, sputum viscosity, humidification effect, lung infection control time among three groups (P < 0.05), with group C better than group A and B in above parameters. ConclusionsCompared with MR410 and MR850 humidification devices, AIRVO2 is a more ideal device for airway humidification, and is more suitable for patients with artificial airway offline.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of AIRVO2 respiratory humidification apparatus in patients with tracheotomy after successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsOne hundred subjects were randomly divided into a control group (treated with the tracheotomy mask joint oxygen inhalation by heating humidifier, n=50) and an observation group (treated with AIRVO2 model, n=50) on the basis of conventional therapy. Blood gas indexes (pH, PaO2, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2) and clinical data (heart rate, respiratory rate, SpO2, sputum viscosity) were recorded at 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h after weaning. Besides, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection, rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), successful weaning rate from mechanical ventilation and daily cost of weaning between the two groups were compared at 72 h after weaning.ResultsAfter treatment, all observed data of the patients were obviously improved compared with those before treatment. The differences of humidification effects between the observation group and the control group at the same time point were statistically significant (P<0.05). The differences of heart rate, respiratory rate, and SpO2 between the observation group and the control group at the same time point were statistically significant (P<0.05). The improvement of PaO2 and PaCO2 at the same time point were statistically different between the observation group and the control group (P<0.05). Seventy-two hours after weaning, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection and RSBI in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), successful weaning rate from mechanical ventilation in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05), and the average daily cost of weaning from mechanical ventilation in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Nine patients in the control group and 1 patient in the observation group needed secondary mechanical ventilation due to hypoxemia.ConclusionThe therapy of AIRVO2 respiratory humidification apparatus combined with conventional treatment may achieve satisfactory effect for patients of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation with tracheotomy, and it is worthy of promotion in clinical use.
Objective To compare the application effects of two kinds of oxygen and nebulizer inhalation devices applied to patients undergoing partial hepatectomy, with a view to providing reference for clinical selection oxygen and nebulizer inhalation modality. Methods A prospective case-control study was used to select 228 patients who required oxygen inhalation and nebulization after hepatectomy under general anesthesia in the Department of Liver Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January to December 2022 as study subjects, and were randomly divided into two groups: grouping group (n=77) and integrating group (n=151). The traditional oxygen inhalation device and atomization device (grouping oxygen inhalation atomization device) commonly used in clinic were used in the grouping group, and the humidifying bottle and humidifying water were replaced every 24 hours. The integrating group adopts a new device (integrated oxygen atomization inhalation device) which integrates oxygen inhalation and atomization functions. The integrating group was divided into integrating group 1 (n=77) and integrating group 2 (n=74) according to the different time of changing the humidifying bottle and humidifying water. The time for replacing the humidifying bottle and humidifying water in the integrating 1 was the same as that in the grouping group. The time for replacing the humidifying bottle and humidifying water in the integrating group 2 was 48 h after used, and replace again it after 72 hours of used. Samples from different parts of the grouping group and the integrating group 1 were collected at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h and 120 h after oxygen inhalation, respectively, for colony culture. In the integrating group 2, samples were taken for colony culture when the device was changed twice (48 h and 120 h). At the same time, the nurses’ fogging operation time and the fogging noise of the two groups were measured. The self-made patients’ satisfaction questionnaire and nurses’ questionnaire were used to investigate the satisfaction of two groups of patients and 30 medical staff respectively. Results There were no statistically significant difference in the number of bacterial colonies between the grouping group and the integrating group 1 at different time periods and between the two groups at the same time (P＞0.05). In terms of atomization performance, atomization noise in the integrating group was lower than that of the grouping group (P＜0.05), and the atomization preparation and disposal time in the integrating group were shorter than that of the grouping group (P＜0.05). The patients and nurses were more satisfied with the integrating group (P＜0.05). Conclusions There is no difference in pollution risk between the integrated oxygen atomization bottle and the grouped oxygen atomization bottle. The atomization performance and humidification performance of the integrated oxygen atomization bottle are better than that of the grouped oxygen atomization bottle. The noise generated during operation is small, the comfort of patients is high, and the operation time of nurses can be shortened and the work efficiency can be improved, which has high clinical application value.