ObjectiveTo discuss the main auxiliary inspection methods and their guiding significance for inguinal hernia.MethodsBy searching literatures and international guidelines, to review the main auxiliary examination methods, such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI.ResultsClinical physical examination combined with ultrasound could increase diagnostic sensitivity. CT could provide surgeons with a better sense of wholeness and structural details, and could be used as a guide for specific types of inguinal hernia. The soft tissue recognition of MRI was good, and it had a good effect on the identification of hidden hernia, mesh conditions, and tissue inflammation.ConclusionEach examination has its own advantages, and should be selected based on clinical practice and medical center conditions.
ObjectiveTo investigate the guiding value of preoperative imaging and intraoperative rapid pathology in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN).MethodsThe clinical data of 205 patients with PCN diagnosed by pathology from July 14, 2003 to July 31, 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The precise and fuzzy diagnostic rate and misdiagnosis rate of PCN by preoperative imaging and intraoperative rapid pathology were analyzed.ResultsThe most commonly used preoperative imaging methods were ultrasound and CT, in 146 cases (82.95%) and 141 cases (80.11%), respectively. There were 54 cases (30.68%) with MRI. Of them, 47 cases were examined by single examination, 129 cases received combined examination, of which 123 cases (95.35%) were examined by ultrasound combined with CT. The precise and fuzzy diagnostic rate of PCN by ultrasound, CT, and MRI were 81.51% (119/146), 81.56% (115/141), and 87.04% (47/54), respectively. Comparison of ultrasound with CT and MRI showed statistical significance (χ2=47.747, P<0.001; χ2=11.873, P=0.018), but no significant difference was observed between CT and MRI (χ2=5.012, P>0.05). In 27 cases of false diagnosis by ultrasound, no obvious abnormality was found in 14 cases (51.85%), followed by misdiagnosis as pancreatic pseudocyst (11 cases, 40.74%). Of the 26 cases misdiagnosed as pancreatic cancer by CT, 57.69% (15 cases) were misdiagnosed as pancreatic cancer; 7 cases were misdiagnosed by MRI, 42.86% (3 cases) of patients were misdiagnosed as pancreatic cancer and pancreatic pseudocyst. Thirty-one cases were misdiagnosed by intraoperative rapid pathology, and most of them misdiagnosed as pancreatic pseudocyst (10 cases, 32.26%). The next was SPN misdiagnosed as pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (7 cases, 22.58%). The precise and fuzzy diagnostic rates of PCN were 81.58% (124/152), 86.84% (132/152), and 97.37% (148/152) in preoperative imaging, intraoperative rapid pathology, and preoperative imaging combined with intraoperative rapid pathology, while the misdiagnostic rates were 18.42% (28/152), 13.16% (20/152), and 2.63% (4/152), respectively.ConclusionsIn preoperative imaging and intraoperative rapid pathological examination, it is possible that ultrasound could not find PCN lesions. CT and MRI are most likely to be misdiagnosed as pancreatic cancer. Intraoperative rapid pathological examination misdiagnosed as pancreatic pseudocyst is most common. Perfect preoperative imaging and rapid intraoperative pathology can improve the correct diagnosis rate of PCN and avoid unreasonable surgical intervention measures.
In recent years, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been increasingly used for the treatment of peritoneal metastases. Imaging examination plays an important role in the process of CRS+HIPEC in treatment of peritoneal metastasis. This article briefly introduces the preoperative imaging evaluation, postoperative imaging evaluation, and current limitations of CRS+HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal metastases.
Objective To summarize the evaluation methods of postoperative healing of supraspinatus tendon tear in recent years, in order to provide reference for clinic. Methods CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, and Foreign Medical Literature Retrieval Service (FMRS) databases were used to search the literatures between 2005 and 2022. The literature related to the diagnosis and postoperative healing of supraspinatus tendon tear was included. Finally, 50 articles were reviewed. ResultsSupraspinatus tendon tear is a common shoulder disease. Physical examination, clinical score, and imaging examination are used to predict and evaluate the postoperative healing. Among them, physical examination and clinical score are non-invasive and the most economical methods, but their accuracy and sensitivity are lower than imaging examination, so they can only be used as auxiliary methods. The acromio-humeral distance (AHD) and upward migration index (UMI) measured by X-ray films can directly reflect the change of supraspinatus tendon thickness, but they are impossible to distinguish whether there is tear or not. Ultrasound and MRI are the main methods for the clinical diagnosis of supraspinatus tendon tear, but the commonly used MRI sequence can not accurately judge the internal healing of the tendon. Shear wave elastrography (SWE) and ultrashort-echo-time (UTE) techniques are the latest research directions in recent years, but different studies have shown opposite conclusions on the application of SWE technique. This conclusion shows that the principle of SWE technique and its relationship with tendons need to be further studied. UTE technique has good clinical effect, and the T2* value obtained by UTE technique is more accurate than that of traditional Sugaya typing, but there are still few research samples. Conclusion AHD and UMI measured by X-ray film and T2* value measured by UTE technique can be used as effective methods for evaluating the healing of supraspinatus tendon tear after repairing, and can be used as a follow-up evaluation method combined with physical examination and clinical score for patients with supraspinatus tendon tear.