ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of different use time of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) on the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremities after arthroplasty.MethodsBetween October 2018 and February 2019, 94 patients who planned to undergo unilateral total hip or knee arthroplsty and met the selection criteria were randomly divided into a control group (47 cases) and a trial group (47 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, surgical site, and surgical reason between the two groups (P>0.05). After returning to the ward, all patients were treated with IPC. And the IPC was used until 9:00 pm on the day after operation in the trial group and until 8:00 am the next day after operation in the control group. The levels of hemoglobin, platelet count, D-dimer, hospital stay, treatment costs, patients’ satisfaction with IPC, the parameters of thromboelastrography [kinetics (K value), freezing angle (α angle), reaction time (R value), maximum amplitude (MA value)], visual analogue scale (VAS) score, circumference difference of calf before and after operation, Pittsburgh sleep assessment score, and the incidence of DVT of lower limbs were recorded and compared between the two groups.ResultsThe K value and D-dimer before operation were significant different between the two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pre- and post-operative hemoglobin, platelet count, and the other parameters of thromboelastography between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in pre- and post-operative VAS scores and post-operative circumference difference of calf between the two groups (P>0.05). The sleep assessment score of the trial group at 1 day after operation was significant lower than that of the control group (t=2.107, P=0.038). There was no significant difference in the hospital stay and treatment costs between the two groups (P>0.05). There was 1 case (2.1%) of DVT, 3 cases (6.4%) of intermuscular venous thrombosis, and 1 case (2.1%) of infection in the trial group, and 2 cases (4.3%), 4 cases (8.5%), and 0 (0) in the control group. The differences were not significant (P>0.05). After the completion of postoperative IPC treatment, the satisfaction rates of using IPC were 89.4%(42/47) in the trial group and 70.2% (33/47) in the control group, and the difference was not significant (χ2=0.097, P=0.104).ConclusionIPC using for a short period of time after arthroplasty do not increase the degrees of the pain and the swelling of calf; it can effectively prevent DVT of the lower extremity, improve the quality of sleep in patients, and is good for the limbs rehabilitation.
Objective To investigate the compliance status of intermittent pneumatic compression device (IPCD) in patients after lumbar surgery, and to analyze the reasons and influencing factors affecting compliance. Methods The continuous enrollment method was used to select patients who underwent posterior decompression for lumbar degenerative diseases in the orthopedic department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital between December 2022 and June 2023. The general information of patients and their compliance with IPCD were collected, and the reasons that affected compliance were analyzed. ResultsA total of 46 patients were included. The overall proportion of patients with good compliance was relatively low, and their compliance was poor. On the first and second day after surgery, the daytime compliance was relatively good (the proportion range of excellent compliance was 39%-52%); the compliance at night was significantly lower than that during the daytime (the proportion range of excellent compliance was 21%-26%); after 3 days of surgery, the patients’ compliance significantly decreased. A total of 460 time periods were observed and 195 reasons for not using IPCD were collected. The main reasons were physical discomfort caused by the device, inconvenience during bedside activities, and little significance to the patient. The compliance of female patients was better than that of males (P<0.05). Patients with education level of primary school and below had the highest compliance, while patients with high school and above had the lowest compliance (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in compliance among patients of different age groups (P>0.05). Conclusions The overall compliance of patients with IPCD after lumbar surgery is poor, which is an urgent clinical problem, and the adaptability and cognitive level of patients to the device are the main factors affecting compliance. In clinical nursing work, men and patients with higher education level should be strengthened.