Objective To summarize the selection criteria and clinical application of surgical methods for hip fractures (femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture) in the elderly. Methods The related literature concerning the surgical methods for femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly at home and abroad was extensively reviewed and summarized. Results Among the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture, the closed reduction and internal fixation or dynamic hip screw (DHS), and total hip arthroplasty are recommended for patients under 65 years old and 65–80 years old respectively and without special surgical contraindication; whereas hemiarthroplasty is recommended for patients with poor physical conditions. Among the patients with intertrochanteric fracture, DHS or the 3rd generation of Gamma nails is recommended for patients with stable fracture while the intramedullary fixation systems (e.g., proximal femoral nail anti-rotation, intertrochanteric antegrade nail) and the extramedullary fixation systems (e.g., proximal femoral locking compression plate and less invasive stabilization system) can be applied to the patients with unstable fracture according to the fracture type and bone conditions. Notably, hip arthroplasty is recommended for elderly patients with comminuted fracture. Conclusion The surgical method and internal fixator should be chosen according to the fracture type and bone condition in the elderly in order to improve the effectiveness and reduce the complication.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of anterior subcutaneous internal fixator combined with posterior plate in the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures.MethodsBetween January 2015 and January 2019, 26 cases of unstable pelvic fractures were treated with anterior subcutaneous internal fixator combined with posterior plate. There were 16 males and 10 females, with an average age of 42.8 years (range, 25-66 years). According to the Tile classification, 9 of them belonged to type B2, 6 to type B3, 7 to type C1, 3 to type C2, 1 to type C3. The injury severity score (ISS) was 6-43 (mean, 18.3). Four cases combined with brain injury, 7 with limb fractures, 3 with hemopneumothorax, 1 with sciatic nerve injury. The time from injury to operation was 4-12 days (mean, 6.4 days). The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and the complications were recorded. The fracture reduction and the postoperative function of patients were evaluated.ResultsAll patients were followed up 12-26 months (mean, 16.8 months). The operation time was 65-142 minutes (mean, 72.5 minutes) and the intraoperative blood loss was 42-124 mL (mean, 64.2 mL). There were 2 cases of unilateral lateral femoral cutaneous nerve stimulation, 1 case of femoral nerve paralysis, and 1 case of superficial infection of incision, which were cured after corresponding treatment. X-ray films showed that all fractures healed at 3 months after operation. At last follow-up, according to Matta criteria for fracture reduction, the results were excellent in 8 cases, good in 15 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 88.5%. According to Majeed scoring system for pelvic function, the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 12 cases, and fair in 4 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 84.6%.ConclusionFor unstable pelvic fractures, the anterior subcutaneous internal fixator combined with posterior plate has fewer operative complications, high security, and achieve good effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of anterior subcutaneous pelvic internal fixator (INFIX) and plate internal fixation in treatment of unstable anterior pelvic ring fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 48 patients with unstable anterior pelvic ring fractures who met the selection criteria between June 2014 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 21 cases were treated with INFIX (INFIX group), and 27 cases were treated with plate (plate group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and fracture type between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, partial weight-bearing time, and complete weight-bearing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. Matta standard was used to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction, and Majeed score system was used to evaluate the functional recovery of pelvic fracture after operation.ResultsThe patients in both groups were followed up for an average of 12.5 months (range, 6-16 months). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in INFIX group were significantly lower than those in plate group (t=−11.965, P=0.000; t=−20.105, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the quality of fracture reduction, fracture healing time, partial weight-bearing time, and complete weight-bearing time between the two groups (P>0.05). At 14 weeks after operation, there was no significant difference in the scores of pain, working, standing and walking, and total scores between INFIX group and plate group (P>0.05), but there were significant differences in sitting and sexual intercourse scores (t=−4.250, P=0.003; t=−6.135, P=0.006). The incidences of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, femoral nerve injury, and heterotopic ossification were significantly higher in INFIX group than in plate group (P<0.05), while the incidence of incision infection was lower in INFIX group than in plate group (P<0.05).ConclusionCompared with the plate internal fixation, the INFIX internal fixation can obtain the similar effectiveness for the unstable anterior pelvic ring fracture and has the advantages of shorter operation time, less blood loss, and lower risk of infection.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of unstable pelvic fractures treated with minimally invasive percutaneous bridge internal fixator or traditional external fixator.MethodsThe clinical data of 45 patients with unstable pelvic fractures who met the selection criteria between January 2013 and February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into two groups. In the observation group (25 cases), minimally invasive percutaneous bridge internal fixators were used, and three-dimensional printing pelvic models were used to simulate the reduction and fixation before operation to develop individual reduction strategies. In the control group (20 cases), external fixators were used. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, cause of injury, fracture type (according to Tile classification), and time from injury to operation (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The reduction quality was evaluated according to the Matta standard, and functional recovery was evaluated according to the Majeed scoring standard.ResultsAll patients were followed up 12-20 months (mean, 15 months). The operation time of the observation group was significantly longer than that of the control group (t=2.719, P=0.009); no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss was found between the two groups (t=0.784, P=0.437). There was no significant difference between the two groups in fracture healing time (t=0.967, P=0.341). According to the Matta standard, the excellent and good rate of the observation group was 92%, and that of the control group was 70%, showing no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=3.748, P=0.053). At last follow-up, according to the Majeed scoring standard, the excellent and good rate of the observation group was 88%, and that of the control group was 60%, showing significant difference between the two groups (χ2=4.717, P=0.030). The incidences of incision and nailway infection, secondary displacement of fracture, and malunion in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05); the differences in incidences of iatrogenic injury of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, deep vein thrombosis, and loosening of fixation between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05).ConclusionMinimally invasive percutaneous bridge internal fixator is a safe and effective method for the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures. It has the advantages of minimal trauma, stable fixation, less interference to patients’ daily life, early functional exercise, and quickly recovery after operation.
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of orthopedic robot-assisted sacroiliac joint screws in the treatment of posterior pelvic ring fractures. Methods Patients who underwent sacroiliac joint screw fixation in People’s Hospital of Deyang City between January 2018 and August 2021 were included, and the patients were divided intoa robotic group and a manual group by randomization. The robot group used robot-assisted insertion of sacroiliac joint screws, and the manual group used manual insertion of sacroiliac joint screws. The general condition, time of sacroiliac joint screw placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, guide needle drilling times, surgical blood loss, and Majeed pelvic function score were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 42 patients were included, and there was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index , injury type or injury cause between the two groups (P>0.05). Finally, 21 screws were placed in 19 patients in the robotic group and 23 screws in 23 patients in the manual group. The wounds of the two groups were completely healed after operation, and there was no wound infection, iatrogenic vascular and nerve injury, and no loosening of internal fixation. There was no significant difference in screw placement time, blood loss or Majeed score between the two groups (P>0.05). The number of fluoroscopy (14.53±4.54 vs. 19.87±5.48) and drilling times (1.00±0.00 vs. 7.24±3.77) in the robotic group were less than those in the manual group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Orthopedic surgical robots have the advantages of minimally invasive, less fluoroscopy, and accurate screw placement in sacroiliac joint screw placement, and have good clinical results in the treatment of pelvic fractures.
Pelvic fractures are often caused by high-energy trauma. The condition of patients is complex and requires active therapy. The treatment of pelvic fractures includes conservative and surgical treatment. Surgical treatment is suitable for patients with unstable pelvic fractures. In recent years,the anterior subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) for the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures has been popularized and achieved extraordinary outcomes. INFIX is a relatively novel technology for the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fractures. It has excellent biomechanical properties, a wide range of indications, and has the advantages of minimally invasive, convenient care, fewer complications, and better clinical outcomes. If patients with anterior pelvic ring fractures have the indications for INFIX after careful evaluation, INFIX is recommended. This article summarizes the research progress of INFIX in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fractures, and summarizes its surgical methods, biomechanical properties, indications, advantages, complications and clinical outcomes.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of modified internal fixator (INFIX) to fix the anterior pelvic ring for Tile C1.3 pelvic fracture by comparing with the traditional INFIX. MethodsThe patients with Tile C1.3 pelvic fractures admitted between April 2018 and June 2021 were taken as the study objects. Of them, 55 cases were included in the study according to the selection criteria. During operation, the anterior pelvic ring was fixed with the modified INFIX in 30 cases (modified group) and with the traditional INFIX in 25 cases (control group). The posterior pelvic ring in 55 cases was fixed with sacroiliac screws. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, and combined injury (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The X-ray film was taken to evaluate the reduction of the anterior pelvic ring after operation, grade the reduction according to the Matta scoring standards, and observe the fracture healing and healing time. The function was evaluated according to Majeed scoring standards during follow-up. Results The operation time of the modified group was significantly longer than that of the control group (Z=–3.837, P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (t=–1.831, P=0.076). All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14 months). X-ray film reexamination showed that the excellent and good rate of Matta scoring for anterior pelvic ring reduction in the modified group was 88.00%, which was significantly better than that in the control group (63.33%) (χ2=4.373, P=0.037). All fractures healed, and the fracture healing time of the modified group and the control group was (12.04±3.59) and (14.83±4.83) weeks respectively, with a significant difference (t=2.401, P=0.020). At last follow-up, the excellent and good rates of Majeed scoring were 80.00% in the modified group and 76.67% in the control group, with no significant difference (χ2=0.089, P=0.766). In the modified group, 2 cases (8%) had complications, all of which were incision infection above pubic symphysis. In the control group, 9 cases (30%) had complications, including 5 cases of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, 2 cases of femoral nerve paralysis, and 2 cases of delayed fracture healing. The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the modified group than in the control group (χ2=4.125, P=0.042). ConclusionCompared with the traditional INFIX, the modified INFIX to fix the anterior pelvic ring for Tile C1.3 pelvic fracture has fewer complications, better stability, shorter fracture healing time, and lower risk of nerve injury.