摘要:目的：评价围手术期预防性应用抗菌药物现状及合理性。方法：采用回顾性调查的方法，随机抽查2009年度Ⅰ类切口手术围手术期病案500份，设计外科围手术期预防性应用抗生素调查表，对预防用药的适应证、用药种类、联合用药、给药时机及持续时间进行统计分析。结果：未使用抗生素5例，预防性使用抗生素495例，其中不合理80例（16.00％）。预防性使用抗生素总品规数为540，其中头孢菌素类453例（83.89%），青霉素类（包括加酶抑制剂）26例（4.81%），喹诺酮类44例（8.15%）。选用头孢唑啉钠178例（32.96%）居第一位，头孢替唑钠第二，151例（2796%）。结论：Ⅰ类切口手术患者围手术期预防性使用抗菌药物较为合理，但仍存在用药指征把握不严，抗菌药物的选择、抗菌药物使用时间较长等问题，有待进一步规范化管理。Abstract: Objective: To understand the current application of perioperative preventive antibiotics, and their rationality. Methods: Five hundred perioperative records of patients with incision Ⅰ were randomly chosen and surveyed in 2009. A questionnaire for prophylactic use of antimicrobial was designed. The indication of antimicrobial use, the species, combination, timing and drug duration were analyzed. Results: Our of 500, 495 used antimicrobial and 80 were unreasonable; 540 kinds of antimicrobial were used, included cephalosporin 453 cases (83.89%), penicillin class (including plus enzyme inhibitors) in 26 cases (4.81%), quinolone 44 cases (8.15%). Cefazolin sodium (178 patients, 32.96%) ranked first, second was cefazolin sodium (151, 27.96%). Conclusion: Perioperative use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with incision Ⅰ is reasonable, but standardization management should be strengthened in the indication, species, and duration.
Objective To understand the situation and technical level of aeromedical rescue in medical institutions in Qinling-Daba mountainous area. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted on the staff of medical institutions of the medical consortium of Renmin Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine, located in Qinling-Daba mountainous area between June and September 2023. The basic information and development, demand, and knowledge mastery of aeromedical rescue were investigated. Results A total of 45 medical institutions participated in the research, 500 questionnaires were sent out, and 479 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective rate of 95.8%. Among them, there were 7 tertiary hospitals, 23 secondary hospitals, and 15 township health institutions; 11 medical institutions had participated in aeromedical rescue, and 17 hospitals had participated in aerial rescue drills. The survey subjects were mainly from emergency departments and intensive care medicine departments, women, aged>30 and ≤40 years old, undergraduate students, intermediate professional titles, and doctors. Twenty-one medical workers had received formal training in aeromedical rescue skills, 77 had received short-term theoretical and practical training, 123 had participated in short-term simulation exercises, and 93 had participated in aeromedical rescue activities. There was a statistically significant difference among the scores of first aid knowledge, aviation flight knowledge, and aeromedical rescue knowledge (9.34±0.35 vs. 4.65±2.91 vs. 3.28±3.44; F=15.048, P=0.001). There were statistically significant differences between first aid knowledge and aviation flight knowledge, as well as between first aid knowledge and aeromedical rescue knowledge (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between aviation flight knowledge and aeromedical medical rescue knowledge (P>0.05). Conclusion There is an urgent demand for aviation rescue in medical institutions in Qinling-Daba mountainous area, and there is a shortage of professionals, so it is necessary to strengthen the training, rehearsal and practice of aeromedical rescue.