ObjectiveTo observe the character of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment in patients with high-grade L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis, and to analyze the sagittal alignment alteration after operation. MethodBetween January 2009 and June 2014, 25 patients with high-grade L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis underwent posterior surgery, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed as study group. There were 14 males and 11 females with a mean age of 42.5 years (range, 20-65 years). The mean disease duration was 6 months (range, 3-12 months). According to the Meyerding evaluating system, 15 cases were rated as degree III, and 10 cases as degree IV. Eighty healthy adult volunteers were recruited simultaneously as control group. The lumbar sacral angle (LSA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured on preoperative and last follow-up standing full length lateral X-ray films. And these parameters were compared between study group (preoperative parameters) and control group. Then the patients in study group were divided into 2 subgroups according to Hresko's method:the balanced pelvis subgroup (n=14) and unbalanced pelvis subgroup (n=11) . The sagittal parameters were compared between 2 subgroups, and the alteration of sagittal parameters before surgery and at last follow-up was analyzed in each subgroup respectively. ResultsAll patients in study group were followed up 18 months on average (range, 6-48 months). After surgery, spondylolisthesis was reduced from degree III to degree 0 in 12 cases and to degree I in 3 cases, and from degree IV to degree 0 in 6 cases and to degree I in 4 cases. Bone fusion was obtained in all patients at last follow-up. The preoperative PI, SS, PT, and SVA of study group were significantly greater than those of control group (P<0.05) , while the TK was significantly smaller than that of control group (P<0.05) . In the balanced pelvis subgroup, LSA, LL, and SVA at last follow-up significantly decreased while TK significantly increased when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05) . In the unbalanced pelvis subgroup, LSA, PT, and SVA at last follow-up significantly decreased while SS, LL, and TK significantly increased when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05) . The preoperative LSA and PT in the unbalanced pelvis subgroup were significantly greater, while SS, LL, and TK were significantly smaller than those of balanced pelvis subgroup (P<0.05) ; while at last follow-up, significant differentce was found only in LSA between 2 subgroups (P<0.05) . ConclusionsThe LSA should be paid more attention in surgery to assure recovery of the sagittal balance because patients with high-grade L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis have greater PI, abnormal lumbosacral kyphosis, and sagittal imbalance.
ObjectiveTo observe vertebral three-dimensional motion characteristics of adjacent segments in patients with symptomatic L4 isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS). MethodsFourteen symptomatic L4 IS patients who underwent surgery treatment (trial group) and 15 asymptomatic volunteers without back pain and other lesions of spine (control group) were recruited. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, and bone mineral density between the two groups (P>0.05). The three-dimensional reconstruction model of lumbar spine was acquired from the thin slice CT of the lumbar spine of the subjects by combining dual-X-ray fluoroscopy imaging system with spiral CT examination. The model was matched to the double oblique X-ray fluoroscopy images captured by dual-X-ray fluoroscopy imaging system at different active positions of the lumbar spine to reproduce the three-dimensional instantaneous of lumbar spondylolisthesis at different state of motion. The motion and relative displacement of adjacent segments (L3, 4 and L5, S1) of spondylolisthesis were measured quantitatively by establishing a three-dimensional coordinate system at the geometric center of the vertebral body. The results were compared with those of the control group. ResultsWhen L3, 4 in the control group were flexed flexion-extension, left-right twisting, and left-right bending, and when L5, S1 in the control group were flexed left-right twisting and left-right bending, the activity along the main axis of motion (main axis of motion) tended to increase compared with that along the corresponding coupled axis of motion (secondary axis of motion); however, this trend disappeared in the trial group, and the main and secondary movements were disordered. Because of the coronal orientation of the facet joints of L5, S1, the degree of motion along the main axis of motion decreased during flexion and extension, but this trend disappeared in the trial group. Compared with the control group, L3, 4 in the trial group exhibited displacement instability in flexion-extension, left-right twisting, and left-right bending (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the relative displacement of L5, S1 intervertebral bodies along x, y, and z axes between the trial group and the control group in flexion-extension, left-right twisting, and left-right bending curvature (P>0.05). ConclusionPatients with symptomatic L4 IS have disorders of primary and secondary movement patterns in adjacent segments, while IS showed significantly displacement instability in L3, 4 and significantly decreased motion in L5, S1.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of vertebral arch replantation and laminectomy in the treatment of mild to moderate isthmic spondylolisthesis.MethodsThe clinical data of 66 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with vertebral arch replantation or laminectomy between March 2014 and July 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into trial group (34 cases, treated with complete replantation of vertebral arch, intervertebral fusion, and internal fixation) and control group (32 cases, treated with laminectomy with intervertebral fusion and internal fixation) according to different surgical methods. There was no significant difference in general data of gender, age, disease duration, lesion segment, Meyerding grade, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, vertebral arch fusion of trial group, and epidural scar formation of the two groups were recorded. The VAS score, JOA score, and ODI score were evaluated at preoperation, 3, 6, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The effectiveness was evaluated according to HOU Shuxun’s criteria.ResultsAll the patients successfully completed the surgery, without any aggravation of nerve injury, dural tear, infection, etc. There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (t=0.583, P=0.562), but the intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the trial group than that in the control group (t=2.134, P=0.037). All the 66 patients were followed up 13-18 months (mean, 16.2 months). Postoperative clinical symptoms of all patients were significantly improved. In the control group, 7 cases were found to have symptoms of spinal canal stenosis with postoperative posture changes at 3 months after operation, and 5 cases showed mild lower limb numbness at 18 months after operation. No complication such as infection and nerve injury occurred in other patients. In the trial group, 34 cases of epidural scar tissue were completely blocked outside the replantation vertebral arch, while in the control group, 11 cases of epidural scar tissue invaded the spinal canal. At last follow-up, the fusion rate of intervertebral bone grafting and vertebral arch replantation in the trial group was 100%, and the fusion rate of intervertebral bone grafting in the control group was also 100%. The VAS score, ODI score, and JOA score were significantly improved at each time point after operation (P<0.01). The ODI score and JOA score of the trial group were significantly better than those of the control group at 3 months after operation and at last follow-up (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in scores between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). According to HOU Shuxun’s criteria, the excellent and good rate was 91.2% in the trial group and 84.4% in the control group, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.092, P=0.573).ConclusionCompared with laminectomy, vertebral arch replantation can better improve postoperative neurological symptoms, maximize the reconstruction of the bone spinal canal, restore the stability of the intraspinal environment, and it is a better surgical method for lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis.