With the swift evolution of bariatric and metabolic surgery, additional procedures building upon sleeve gastrectomy have consistently surfaced. Recent studies suggest that sleeve gastrectomy with jejunojejunal bypass (SG-JJB) yields superior short-term weight reduction outcomes compared to sleeve gastrectomy alone, with weight loss and glycemic control effects akin to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and without significant complications. As a result, SG-JJB is regarded as a safe and efficacious bariatric procedure, noted for its technical simplicity and reversibility, presenting substantial clinical utility. Nonetheless, high-quality, multicenter, large-sample, long-term follow-up randomized controlled trials are essential to further ascertain its long-term efficacy and safety, and to facilitate its standardized implementation. This article seeks to review the advancements in SG-JJB research, evaluate its effectiveness and safety in managing obesity and associated comorbidities, and explore its future developmental trajectory.
ObjectiveTo analyze why sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with jejunojejunal bypass (SG-JJB), despite being the second most common bariatric procedure in China, has neither been recommended in domestic and international guidelines nor endorsed by expert consensus; investigate the primary obstacles to its standardization and widespread adoption; and propose strategies leveraging China’s extensive clinical experience to refine the technique, establish standardized protocols, and address existing challenges, thereby defining its future role in metabolic surgery. MethodsBy systematically reviewing the evolution, current evidence profile, and distinctions of SG-JJB compared to other SG-Plus procedures, this study focused on identifying constraints hindering its adoption. Concurrently, considering the characteristics of domestic healthcare resources, we analyzed the feasibility of procedural refinements, key steps for standardization, and solutions to potential challenges, thereby facilitating the optimization and standardization of SG-JJB. ResultsThe three key constraints hindering SG-JJB development were: risks of blind loop syndrome, uncertainty regarding optimal bypass limb length, and limited evidence on long-term efficacy. To address these issues, this study proposed leveraging China’s clinical and multi-center collaboration strengths to: conduct high-quality studies defining the impact of bypass length on outcomes, establish unified diagnostic and monitoring protocols for blind loop syndrome, and systematically collect longitudinal data to evaluate long-term efficacy, thereby informing evidence-based surgical standardization. ConclusionsSG-JJB holds significant potential in Chinese bariatric-metabolic practice, yet its standardization faces challenges. Addressing concerns about blind loop syndrome, defining optimal bypass limb length, and accumulating robust long-term efficacy data are pivotal to advancing SG-JJB standardization and adoption. Leveraging domestic clinical resources through multi-center collaborations, high-quality research, and evidence-based protocol development is the essential pathway to overcoming these barriers, achieving standardized implementation, and securing recognition in authoritative guidelines.