ObjectiveTo prospectively study the effect of preventing postoperative reflux esophagitis with esophagogastrostomy and RouxenY gastrojejunostomy after proximal subtotal gastrectomy.MethodsTwentysix cases of carcinoma of the gastric fundus and cardia were allocated randomly to 2 groups (the control group with 12 cases and the experimental group with 14 cases) according to odd or even number of the admission number.After proximal subtotal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy, the control group underwent pyloroplasty while the experimental group with pyloruspreserving RouxenY gastrojejunostomy.The inflammatory reaction of the tissue obtained at the esophagogastric junction using a fiber gastroscope was observed after half year of postoperative followup in the two groups.An examination of gastric emptying of a radionuclidelabeled test meal were performed.According to the Visick score of followup data,the effects of operation were evaluated.The 5year survival rate was also evaluated.ResultsThe postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms in the experimental group were slighter than those in the control group.The examination of gastric emptying of a radionuclidelabeled test meal showed that the gastric emptying time of a half dose,gastric remains rates of radionuclide after 10 min and 60 min in the experimental group were similar to those in the control healthy people group.But in the control group,the gastric emptying time of a half dose delayed,and the gastric remains rate of radionuclide after 10 min and 60 min were higher than the other groups.The biopsy study of the esophagogastric junction showed that the inflammatory reaction in the experimental group was slighter than that in the control group.There was no significant difference between the two groups in the survival rate.ConclusionFor patients with carcinoma of the gastric fundus and cardia, after proximal subtotal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy,compared with pyloroplasty,pyloruspreserving RouxenY gastrojejunostomy can decrease the reflux esophagitis,and relieve the postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms.
Objective To investigate the effect of the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in invaginating end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy. Methods A retrospective review was conducted for 200 patients treated with pancreaticoduod-enectomy （PD） between August 2005 and December 2012. Reconstruction of digestive tract in PD was done according to the method described by Child. The duct-to-mucosa anastomosis was applied in the invaginating end-to-side pancrea-ticojejunostomy. The outline of the anastomosis structures was as follows：anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa， anastomosis of pancreatic and jejunal resection margin， and anastomosis of pancreas and jejunal seromuscular layer. A cilicone tube was put into the pancreatic duct and lead to the jejunum. The anastomotic stoma was covered with part of the omentum majus, and put a drainage tube under the anastomotic stoma. Results The operation went smoothly，and no deaths occurred during perioperative period. The surgical time was 280-420 min， the average time was （298±77） min. The pancreatic fistula were observed in 22 patients （11%）， including 17 patients in Grade A， 2 patients in Grade B， and 3 patients in Grade C. The other complications were observed in 19 patients， including 16 patients with addominal infection， 1 patient with bleeding from splenic vein， 1 patient with bleeding from ruptured of pseudoaneurysm at biliary intestinal anastomosis， 1 patient with abdominal abscess. Three patients with pancreatic fistula in Grade C were cured by reoperation, and the other patients with pancreatic fistula were cured by expectant treatment. Conclusions The duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in invaginating end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy is a simple and safe procedure that has the advantage in reducing the incidence of the pancreatic fistula. Using omentum to cover the anastomotic could localize the diffusion of panreactic fistula， and reduce the incidence of serious complications caused by pancreatic fistula.
Objective To investigate the risk factors of infection after radiofrequency ablation in patients with liver metastases after choledochojejunostomy. Methods The clinical data of patients with liver metastases treated by radiofrequency ablation in our hospital from January 2010 to April 2022 were collected retrospectively and analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 57 patients were included in the study, and the total number of postoperative infections was 19 (33.33%). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the tumor location, maximum tumor diameter, number of tumors, ablation times, and ablation duration were related to the occurrence of infection after radiofrequency ablation (P<0.01). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the tumor location [OR=6.45, 95%CI (1.11, 37.35), P=0.037] and ablation duration [OR=1.49, 95%CI (1.16, 1.91), P=0.002] were independent risk factors for infection after radiofrequency ablation in patients with choledocho-jejunostomy. Conclusions For patients with metastatic liver cancer with a history of choledochojejunostomy, the tumor location and the duration of ablation are closely related to postoperative infection. We should strengthen the indivi-dualized management of such patients during and after operation should be strengthened to promote disease recovery.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic magnetic compression cholangiojejunostomy (LMCCJ) with laparoscopic hand-sutured cholangiojejunostomy (LHSCJ). MethodsA retrospective case-control study was performed. From January 2019 to May 2022, 37 patients, who underwent laparoscopic treatment in this hospital, were enrolled in this study. There were 16 cases in the LMCCJ group and 21 cases in the LHSCJ group. The demographic information, procedure time to complete bilioenteric reconstruction, postoperative hospital stay, operative complications, magnets expulsion time, and follow-up results were collected and analyzed. ResultsThere were no statistical differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, composition of primary diseases, preoperative total bilirubin, and preoperative common bile duct diameter between the two groups (P＞0.05). The outer diameter of the magnets was (10.50±0.97) mm, the expulsion time of the magnets was (49.69±37.58) d, and the expulsion rate of the magnets was 100% (16/16). There was no intestinal obstruction or gastrointestinal perforation caused by the retention of the magnets. The procedure time to complete bilioenteric reconstruction in the LMCCJ group was statistically shorter than that in the LHSCJ group [(11.31±3.40) min vs. (24.81±3.40) min, t=11.96, P＜0.01]. There was no statistical difference in the total bilirubin level at the first week after surgery between the two groups (U=142.0, P=0.80). The postoperative hospital stay in the LMCCJ group was longer than that in the LHSCJ group [(28.31±14.11) d vs. (16.19±7.56) d, t=3.36, P＜0.01]. During the perioperative period, there was no bleeding or biliary infection in the two groups, but one case of biliary leak in the LHSCJ group. In all 37 patients were followed-up for (548.8±259.2) d. During the follow-up period, the incidence rates of biliary intestinal anastomosis stenosis, tumor recurrence, and mortality had no statistical differences between the two groups (P＞0.05). ConclusionFrom the results of comparative analysis in this study, it can be concluded that LMCCJ is not only safe equally, but also easier and less time-consuming as compared with LHSCJ.
Objective To evaluate the application of a surgical method in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods All the 211 cases of purse-string invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy performed from Dec.1985 to Dec.2007 were reviewed. Firstly, an accordant plastic tube was put and fastened in main pancreatic duct, and pancreas was ligated at 2-3 cm apart from the pancreatic stump to let secretin flow far away. Furthermore, invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy was performed to get closer between pancreas and jejunum. Results Pancreatic fistula and perioperative death didn’t occur among these 211 cases. The complications included 2 cases of incision dehiscence, 4 cases of biliary fistula and 1 case of scission of superior mesentric artery. Conclusion Purse-string invaginated double-layer anastomosis of pancreaticojejunal would be feasible for pancreaticoduodenectomy preventing pancreatic fistula.
Objective To evaluate the operative indication and results of pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods A retrospective study was carried out on the cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy following pancreaticogastrostomy from Aug. 2005 to Feb. 2008 in Shanghai Tongji Hospital. Results During this period, 38 cases had undergone pancreaticogastrostomy with pancreaticoduodenectomy. The median operative time was (352.1±78.3) min. The median intraoperative blood transfusion was (911.3±601.4) ml. The median postoperative length of stay was (26.2±12.1) d. Postoperative morbidity was 21.1% (8/38) with no operative death. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage occurred in 1 patient. Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 2 patients. Incision infection occurred in 2 patients. Abdominal fluid collection occurred in 1 patient and pulmonary infection occurred in 2 patients. All of the complications were treated conservatively. Conclusion Pancreaticogastrostomy is a safer drainage procedure for the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Twenty one cases of hepatocholelithiasis treated through hepatic round ligament approach for hepaticojejunostomy is reported. Of them 5 were introgenic injury to the biliary tract， 8 were left hepatolithiasis (7 complicated with bile duct stricture), 2 were intrahepatic sandy stone with acute suppurative cholangeitis, and 3 were residual stone in left hepatic duct with cystlike dilatation after T-tube drainage; while traumatic injury to the biliary passages, previous multiple biliary tract operations and left hepatic duct stone with acute hemorrhage were present in one of case individually 75.9% each. The ages of the patients were between 32 to 50 years. Clinical follw-up in this series was satisfactory. The authors consider that this approach gives good exposure with little injury to the liver and no liver resection needed. The indication for this approach mode of anastomosis and some operative details are discussed.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of end-to-side binding pancreaticojejunostomy.MethodsFrom March 2009 to December 2019 , 70 patients (pancreatic head cancer in 16 cases, duodenal papillary cancer in 27 cases, bile duct cancer in 8 cases, periampullary cancer in 2 cases, gallbladder cancer invading the pancreatic head in 1 case, intraductal papillary myxoma of pancreas in 6 cases, and mass-type chronic pancreatitis in 10 cases) were performed with end-to-side binding pancreaticojejunostomy were retrospectively analyzed, including large pancreas remnant (n=4). The main procedures included isolation of the pancreatic remnant, incising the jejunal wall and preplacing with seromuscular purse string suture around the incision, performing end-to side binding pancreaticojejunostomy.ResultsThe procedures were successful in all 70 patients. Postoperative complications included pancreatic fistula (n=3, 4.3%), of three patients cured with reoperation, jejunal loop decompression tube was not placed in 2 patients, and 1 patient had pancreatic fistula and bleeding on the eighth day after operation. One out of 3 patients developing abdominal hemorrhage which reoperation died of acute respiratory distress syndrome, 1 patient was cured with the vascular interventional hemostasis. Gastrointestinal anastomotic bleeding (n=1) and adhesive intestinal obstruction (n=1) were cured with reoperation, biliary leakage (n=1) was cured with conservative treatment.ConclusionEnd-to-side binding pancreaticojejunostomy is simple, safe and reliable.
Objective To explore primary surgical treatment experience of typeⅣ hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods From April 2008 to April 2011，20 patients with type Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled into the same surgical group in Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University.The intra- and post-operative results were analyzed.Results The total resection rate was 75%，which was consisted of 10 cases of radical excision and 5 cases of non-radical excision.Seven patients received left hepatic trisegmentectomy and caudate lobe resection including anterior and posterior right hepatic duct reconstruction，hepatojejunostomy，and Roux-en-Y jejunojejunostomy.Six patients received enlarged left hepatic trisegmentectomy and caudate lobe resection including left intrahepatic and extrahepatic duct reconstruction，hepatojejunostomy，and Roux-en-Y jejunojejunostomy. Two patients received quadrate lobe resection including two cholangioenterostomies after anterior and posterior right hepatic duct reconstruction，and left intrahepatic and extrahepatic duct reconstruction.After percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage （PTCD） and portal vein embolization （PVE），two patients with total bilirubins ＞400 mmol/L received radical excision and non-radical excision，respectively.Three patients only received PTCD during operation due to wide liver and distant metastasis，and two patients received T tube drainage during operation and postoperative PTCD due to left and right portal vein involvement. All 15 patients who received lesion resection survived more than one year， whereas another five patients whose lesions can not been resec ted only survived from 3 to 6 months with the mean of 4.2 months.No death occurred during the perioperative period. Conclusions For patients with type Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma， preoperative evaluation and tumor resection shall conducted so as to relieve obstruction of biliary tract，otherwise PTCD and PVE prior to the final lesion resection shall be performed.
Objective To analyze the difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic leakage and anasto-motic bleeding complications in various methods of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy （PD）. Methods The clinical data of 526 patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy from January 2008 to September 2012 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. End-to-side “pancreatic duct to jejunum mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis （abbreviation：mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis） was performed in 359 patients， which contained 149 patients with internal drainage， 130 patients with external drainage， and 80 patients with no drainage. End-to-side invaginated anastomosis was performedin 165 patients without drainage. In addition， side-to-side anastomosis was performed in 2 patients without drainage.Results There were 34 cases （6.46%） of pancreatic leakage， 8 cases （1.52%） of anastomotic bleeding in pancreaticoje-junostomy， and 32 cases of death （6.08%）. ① The pancreatic leakage rate of mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis was signi-ficantly lower than that of end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔4.18% （15/359） versus 11.52% （19/165）， χ2=10.029， P=0.002〕. There was no significant difference of the anastomotic bleeding incidence between mucosa-to-mucosa anasto-mosis and end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔1.67% （6/359） versus 1.21% （2/165）， χ2=0.159， P=0.691〕. ② In the mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis group， the pancreatic leakage rates in the ones with internal drainage and external drainage were lower than those in the ones without drainage， respectively （2.68% （4/149） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=7.132， P=0.008；1.54% （2/130） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=9.410， P=0.002）；which was no significant difference between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕. But there were no significant differences for both the pancreatic leakage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕and anastomotic bleeding incidence 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕 between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage. Conclusions Mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis has a lower pancreatic leakage incidence as compared with end-to-side invaginated anastomosis. However， there is no significant difference of the anast-omotic bleeding incidence. Internal or external drainage could reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage， but have no obvious effect to the anastomotic bleeding incidence.