Objective To evaluate feasibility and clinical application value of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP). Method The clinical data of 17 patients underwent LSPDP from January 2015 to June 2017 in this hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Results The LSPDP was successfully completed in the 17 cases, with Kimura procedure and Warshaw procedure were performed in the 12 cases and 5 cases, respectively. The operative time was (218±60) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (136±114) mL, the time to get out of bed after surgery was (1.4±0.6) d, the postoperative fasting time was (2.0±0.8) d, and the postoperative hospital stay was (13.4±5.7) d. The rate of the postoperative pancreatic fistula was 17.6% (3/17). The spleen infarction occurred in the 2 cases following the Warshaw procedure. The pathologic examination showed that there were 2 patients with the serous cystadenoma, 7 patients with the mucinous cystadenoma, 3 patients with the solid pseudo-papillary tumor, 3 patients with the intraductal papillary mucinous cystadenoma neoplasm, and 2 patients with the insulinoma. All the patients were followed-up for 5 to 26 months (average 13 months), and the perigastric varice occurred in 1 patient, no recurrence or spleen infarction occurred during the following-up. Conclusion LSPDP is a safe, feasible and effective method with less injury and rapid recovery.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-term effectiveness of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) by meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched for manuscripts about RDP versus LDP form PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CKNI, CBM, and WanFang Databases. The parallel quality assessment was selected according to the literature inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant data were extracted and meta-analysis was performed by using Revman 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 23 articles were included, and a total of3 487 patients enrolled who underwent pancreatic body resection. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the LDP group, the RDP group had a longer operation time [MD=15.52, 95%CI was (0.60, 30.45), P=0.04], but the intraoperative blood loss was less [MD=–59.18, 95%CI was (–111.62, –6.73), P=0.03], the intraoperative spleen preservation rate was higher [OR=1.74, 95%CI was (1.02, 2.96), P=0.04], the intraoperative conversion to open rate was lower [ OR=0.45, 95%CI was (0.34, 0.60), P<0.000 01], and postoperative hospital stay was shorter [MD=–0.90, 95%CI was (–1.70, –0.10), P=0.03], while there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood transfusion rate [OR=0.88, 95%CI was (0.60, 1.30), P=0.52], incidence of postoperative overall complication [OR=0.88, 95%CI was (0.68, 1.13), P=0.32] and pancreatic leakage [OR=0.91, 95%CI was (0.72, 1.14), P=0.41], 90-day readmission rate [OR=1.32, 95%CI was (0.95, 1.83), P=0.10], and 90-day reoperation rate [OR=0.73, 95%CI was (0.40, 1.33), P=0.30].ConclusionsRDP has the advantages of less bleeding, low turnover rate, and short postoperative hospital stay. However, due to the quality limitations of the included studies, the above conclusions still need to be verified by more high-quality studies.