Objective To summarize the experience of single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to discuss the operative techniques. Methods The clinical data of 21 cases who underwent single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Shengjing Hospital from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2011 were collected and analyzed. Results Of 21 cases underwent single incision laparoscopic surgery， right hemicolectomy performed in 5 cases， sigmoidectomy performed in 2 cases， rectal anterior resection performed in 9 cases， rectal abdominoperineal resection performed in 2 cases， total colectomy performed in 1 case， and colostomy performed in 2 cases. Twenty cases completed by single incision， but 1 case was added an extra 12 mm incision in order to dissect the lower segment of rectum. The operative time was （189±75） min （40-335min）；the postoperative hospitalization time was （11.5±3.4） d （7-16d）. There were no bleeding， anastomosis leakage or intestinal obstruction after operation， and no incision infection， rupture or hernia were founded. No recurrence was found within 6 months’ follow up after operation. Conclusions Under reasonable selection of indication， single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and feasible， and it also has a satisfactory cosmetic effect and better minimally invasive effect.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. MethodsThe data of two cases undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, including operative time, operation related complications, intraoperative bleeding volumes, number of harvested lymph nodes, postoperative complications, time to restoration of bowel function, and length of postoperative hospital stay, etc, were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsTwo patients had undergone the successful hand-assisted laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy and distal gastrectomy without operation related complications. The operative time was 310 min and 220 min, respectively. While, the intraoperative bleeding volume was 120 ml and 80 ml with the number of harvested lymph node being 38 and 52, respectively. There were no postoperative bleeding, intestinal fistula, and anastomotic leakage， etc. The patients were discharged with smooth and fully recovery. ConclusionThe application of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer is feasible and safe. However, the effectiveness needs further exploring.
ObjectiveTo summarize the procedure of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) with conventional laparoscopic instruments for different tumor diameter and different site of gastric stromal tumor. MethodThe clinical data, intraoperative procedure, and postoperative recovery of 34 patients with gastric stromal tumor from December 2009 to February 2014 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThe transumbilical SILS was performed successfully in all the 34 patients.Among these patients, the wedge resection of stomach was perfor-med in 27 patients, distal subtotal gastrectomy was performed in 6 patients, distal subtotal gastrectomy complicated with multivisceral resection was performed in 1 patient.The pathology confirmed that the diameter of tumors was from 0.6 cm to 10.0 cm (average 3.4 cm).The resection margins were tumor free.The risk assessment showed that tumors with extremely low risk were in 9 cases, low risk were in 17 cases, intermediate risk were in 6 cases, high risk were in 2 cases.During surgery, 9 tumors were located on the fundus of stomach, 6 tumors on the gastric greater curvature, 7 tumors on the gastric lesser curvature, 2 tumors on the anterior and posterior wall of the stomach respectively, 3 tumors on the cardia below, 4 tumors on the gastric antrum, tumor invaded the surrounding organs in 1 case.There was no conversion to open or conventional laparoscopic surgery.no intraoperative or postoperative complications were experi-enced in all the patients except one was postoperative intraperitoneal bleeding and one was incision infection.All the patients were followed for an average of 25 months (range 3-49 months), there was no evident recurrence of disease. ConclusionsThe transumbilical SILS for gastric stromal tumor is a feasible and safe technique when performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.The suitable procedure of SILS should be selected for gastric stromal tumor according their different size and location.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcome between single-incision laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (SILSG) versus laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy (LASG) in treatment of benign gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. MethodsClinical data of 37 patients with benign gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer who underwent laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy between Jan. 2008 and Feb. 2015 at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University was collected retrospectively. Among them, 15 patients underwent SILSG and 22 patients underwent LASG. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data was analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe operative time of SILSG group was significantly longer than that of LASG group (P < 0.050). However, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (P < 0.050), and the total patient scar assesment scale (PSAS) score was significantly lower (P < 0.050) in the SILSG group than those of LASG group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to other variables (P > 0.050), such as conversion rate, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, incidence of complication, and visual analog scale score of pain. All patients received postoperative follow up, and the period ranged from 6 months to 25 months, with a median of 11 months. During the follow up period, no one suffered from incision hernia and recurrence of ulcer. ConclusionCompared with LASG, SILSG is a technically feasible procedure with better cosmesis and equivalent curability.
Objective To observe effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) technique on stress indicators in patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Methods One hundred and twenty patients underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery (Dixon) in the Xinqiao Hospital of the Third Military Medical University were included in this study and then were randomly divided into an ERAS group (n=60) and a conventional treatment group (n=60). The patients in the ERAS group were treated with an ERAS concept during the perioperative period. The patients in the conventional treatment group were treated with a traditional treatment concept during the perioperative period. The stress indicators including white blood cell count (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin (IL)-6 levels were compared in the two groups at admission, 1 h before operation, and 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after operation. The first postoperative anal exhaust time, the first postoperative defecation time, the total hospitalization time, and readmission rate were also recorded after operation. Results ① The age, gender, tumor diameter, and TNM stage had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). ② There were no significant differences in the WBC, CRP and IL-6 levels at admission and 1 h before operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The levels of CRP, IL-6, and WBC in the ERAS group were significantly lower than those in the conventional treatment group at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after operation (P<0.05). ③ The first postoperative anal exhaust time, the first postoperative defecation time, and the total hospitalization time in the ERAS group were significantly shorter than those in the conventional treatment group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in readmission rate between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion ERAS concept is helpful in reducing stress response and could promote earlier recovery of patients with rectal cancer.
Objective To evaluate the influence of dexmedetomidine on the stress of elderly patients with cardiovascular risk undergoing gastrointestinal laparoscopic surgery. Methods From August 2014 to December 2015, 210 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gastrointestinal operations were randomly divided into three groups, including the low concentration group (group D1), the high concentration group (group D2), and the control group (group C), with 70 cases in each group. The patients in group D1 and group D2 were injected with dexmedetomidine (0.4 and 0.8 μg/kg respectively) by infusion pump before anesthesia induction, and were continuously pumped with dexmedetomidine [0.4 and 0.8 μg/(kg·h) respectively] until the end of the surgery. Meanwhile, the patients in group C were injected with normal saline of the equal volumes. The heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was recorded before anesthesia, after endotracheal intubation and extubation. Myocardial ischemia and cardiovascular adverse events thatneeded to be handled were recorded. The concentrations of dopamine, adrenaline (AD) and noradrenaline (NE) were monitored at 15:00 one day before surgery (Ty), one hour after the beginning of surgery (T0), and at 15:00 of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd day after surgery (T1, T2, T3). Results A total of 178 patients completed the study and were enrolled in this study, including 60 cases in group D1 and 59 cases in group D2 and C respectively. In group D1 and D2, the heart rates after intubation [(80.4±9.6), (68.2±10.5) times/minutes], extubation [(70.1±6.2), (69.7±7.8) times/minutes] and MAP after extubation [(100.2±12.0), (98.0±13.1) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)] were lower than those in group C [(98.4±10.5) and (95.2±7.3) times/minutes; (121.8±10.5) mm Hg], and the differences were significant (P<0.05). The bradycardia and hypotension in group D2 (27.12%, 22.03%) was significantly higher than those in group C (3.39%, 8.47%). Hypertension in group D1 and D2 (5.00%, 1.69%) was significantly lower than that in group C (37.29%), and the differences were significant (P<0.05). Compared with the base value at Ty in the three groups, the concentration of dopamine at T0-T3 in group C, at T0-T1 in group D1, and at T0 in group D2 increased significantly (P<0.05); the AD at T0-T3 in group C, at T0-T2 in group D1, and at T0-T1 in group D2 increased significantly (P<0.05); the NE at T0-T2 in group C, and at T1 in group D1 increased significantly (P<0.05). Compared with group C at the same time, the DA at T3 in group D1 and at T1-T3 in group D2, the AD at T2-T3 in group D1 and at T0-T3 in group D2, the NE at T0-T1 in group D1 and T0-T3 in group D2, decreased significantly (P<0.05). Conclusions Dexmedetomidine can effectively restrain the changes of hemodynamics and catecholamine induced by perioperative stress responses in a dose-dependent manner. During the surgery of elderly patients with cardiovascular risk, the concentration of dexmedetomidine should be controlled moderately to gain the optimal effect.
Objective To understand status of technical realization, present development, faced problems, and application prospects of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer, and to analyze safety and feasibility so as to provide theoretical and practical basis for clinical application and promotion. Method By searching the databases such as Medline, Embase, and Wanfang, etc., the relevant literatures about reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer were collected and reviewed. Results At present, the most common reduced-port laparoscopic surgery was the 1-port laparoscopic surgery, 2-port laparoscopic surgery, and 3-port laparoscopic surgery. The 1-port laparoscopic surgery had the effects of minimal invasiveness and cosmesis, but it was difficult to perform. The 2-port laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer preserved as far as possible the effect of minimal invasiveness, the difficulty of procedure was reduced greatly, which was easy to be learnt and promoted. The experience of the 3-port laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer contributed to the technical development of the 1-port laparoscopic surgery, with no need for the assisted incision for intraoperative specimen. The reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer was technically feasible and safe, which possessed the equal or better short-term outcomes as compared with the conventional 5-port laparoscopic or open surgery beside the radical resection for rectal cancer. However, the stringent technique for the laparoscopic surgery was necessary and it needed to overcome the learning curve. Conclusions Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery has some obvious advantages in minimal invasiveness, cosmesis, and enhanced recovery. More large-sample, multi-center, randomized controlled trials are eager to further confirm safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
ObjectiveTo assess the outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted surgery for treatment of advanced gastric cancer.MethodsA total of 115 patients with advanced gastric cancer were included between January 2014 and December 2018 were analyzed retroprospectively, the patients were divided into two groups: open surgery group (OS group, n=63) and laparoscopy-assisted surgery group (LAS group, n=52). Baseline characteristics, intraoperative parameters and postoperative items, and long-term efficacy were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in preoperative baseline data including gender, age and preoperative serum parameters between the two groups (P>0.05). Intraoperative blood loss in the LAS group was significantly less than that in the OS group (P<0.05). In addition, the first feeding time after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the LAS group were significantly shorter than the OS group (P<0.05). Furthermore, numbers of white blood cells and neutrophils in the LAS group were fewer than that in the OS group at postoperative 2 days (P<0.05); the level of serum albumin in the LAS group was higher than that OS group (P<0.05). The number of lymph nodes detected during operation in the LAS group was more than that in the OS group (P<0.05). Operative time and occurrence of postoperative complications were not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0.05). One hundred and ten of 115 patients were followed- up, the follow-up rate was 95.7%. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 48 months, with a median follow-up time of 12.4 months. The disease-free survival time of the OS group was 12.2±6.5 months, while that of the LAS group was 13.5±7.4 months. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsLaparoscopic technique in treatment of advanced gastric cancer has the minimally invasive advantage, less intraoperative blood loss, less surgical trauma, and faster postoperative recovery in comparing to the traditional open surgery. Also the lymph node dissection is superior to open surgery. The curative effect is comparable to that of open surgery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of preoperative gum chewing on the postoperative rehabilitation of patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.MethodsA total of 160 patients undergoing elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery between January and May 2013 were selected to participate in the study. Each patient was randomly assigned to one of the two groups: the trial group (n=80) or the control group (n=80). Thirty to sixty minutes before the surgery, the patients in the trial group chewed one piece of sugarless gum for at least 30 minutes, and then removed the gum before being taken to the operating room; while the patients in the control group chewed nothing. The time to first passage of flatus and the time to first defecation after surgery, length of hospital stay, the degrees of pain at 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 24-, 48-hour after surgery, the incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distension, postoperative analgesic and antiemetic drug requirement were recorded.ResultsThe mean time to first passage of flatus was significantly earlier in the trial group than that in the control group [(16.49±7.64) vs. (20.25±7.94) hours, P=0.003]. The mean time to first defecation was significantly earlier in the trial group than that in the control group [(48.16±15.25) vs. (55.80±18.97) hours, P=0.006]. The degree of pain at 2-hour after surgery was significantly lighter in the trial group than that in the control group (P<0.05). Fewer participants in the trial group than in the control group experienced postoperative nausea (43.75% vs. 61.25%, P=0.027). There were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay, the degrees of pain at 4-, 6-, 8-, 24- and 48-hour after surgery, incidences of postoperative vomiting and abdominal distension, postoperative analgesic, or antiemetic drug requirement between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsGum chewing before surgery can promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function, reduce postoperative short-term pain, and promote postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Gum chewing before surgery can be used clinically as an easy, inexpensive, safe, and effective procedure.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of robotic intersphincteric resection (ISR) for rectal cancer.MethodsA literature search was performed using the China biomedical literature database, Chinese CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library. The retrieval time was from the establishment of databases to April 1, 2019. Related interest indicators were brought into meta-analysis by Review Manager 5.2 software.ResultsA total of 510 patients were included in 5 studies, including 273 patients in the robot group and 237 patients in the laparoscopic group. As compared to the laparoscopic group, the robot group had significantly longer operative time [MD=43.27, 95%CI (16.48, 70.07), P=0.002], less blood loss [MD=–19.98.27, 95%CI (–33.14, –6.81), P=0.003], lower conversion rate [MD=0.20, 95%CI (0.04, –0.95), P=0.04], less lymph node harvest [MD=–1.71, 95%CI (–3.21, –0.21), P=0.03] and shorter hospital stay [MD=–1.61, 95%CI (–2.26, –0.97), P<0.000 01]. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the first flatus [MD=–0.01, 95%CI (–0.48, 0.46), P=0.96], time to diet [MD=–0.20, 95%CI (–0.67, 0.27), P=0.41], incidence of complications [OR=0.76, 95%CI (0.50, 1.14), P=0.18], distal resection margin [MD=0.00, 95%CI (–0.17, 0.17), P=0.98] and positive rate of circumferential resection margin [OR=0.61, 95%CI (0.27, 1.37), P=0.23].ConclusionsRobotic and laparoscopic ISR for rectal cancer shows comparable perioperative outcomes. Compared with laparoscopic ISR, robotic ISR has the advantages of less blood loss, lower conversion rate, and longer operation times. These findings suggest that robotic ISR is a safe and effective technique for treating low rectal cancer.