Objective To investigate the short-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) in treatment of lumbar lateral saphenous fossa combined with intervertebral foramina stenosis via contralateral sublaminar approach. Methods A clinical data of 15 patients with lumbar lateral saphenous fossa combined with intervertebral foramina stenosis, who were admitted between September 2021 and December 2023 and met selective criteria, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 5 males and 10 females with an average age of 70.3 years (range, 46-83 years). Surgical segment was L4, 5 in 12 cases and L5, S1 in 3 cases. The disease duration was 12-30 months (mean, 18.7 months). All patients were treated by UBE via contralateral sublaminar approach. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and the occurrence of complications were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the degree of lower back and leg pain before and after operation; the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the lumbar function; and the clinical outcome was evaluated using the MacNab criteria at 6 months after operation. Postoperative MRI and CT were taken to observe whether the lateral saphenous fossa and intervertebral foramen stenosis were removed or not, and the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal (CSA-SC), cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramen (CSA-IVF), and cross-sectional area of the facet joint (CSA-FJ) were measured. Results The operation time was 55-200 minutes (mean, 127.5 minutes); the intraoperative blood loss was 10-50 mL (mean, 27.3 mL); the length of postoperative hospital stay was 3-12 days (mean, 6.8 days). All patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 8.9 months). At 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after operation, the VAS scores of low back and leg pain and ODI scores after operation were significantly lower than preoperative scores and showed a gradual decrease with time; the JOA scores showed a gradual increase with time; the differences in the above indexes between different time points were significant (P<0.05). The clinical outcome was rated as excellent in 10 cases, good in 4 cases, and poor in 1 case according to the MacNab criteria at 6 months after operation, with an excellent and good rate of 93.33%. Imaging review showed that the compression on the lateral saphenous fossa and intervertebral foramina had been significantly relieved, and the affected articular process joint was preserved to the maximum extent; the CSA-SC and CSA-IVF at 3 days after operation significantly increased compared to the preoperative values (P<0.05), and the CSA-FJ significantly reduced (P<0.05). Conclusion The UBE via contralateral sublaminar approach can effectively reduce pressure in the lateral saphenous fossa and the intervertebral foramina of the same segment while preserving the bilateral articular process joints. The short-term effectiveness is good and it is expected to avoid fusion surgery caused by iatrogenic instability of the lumbar spine. However, further follow-up is needed to clarify the mid- and long-term effectiveness.
Objective To compare the effectiveness between SuperPATH approach and posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Between January 2016 and December 2016, 84 patients with hip disease were included in the study and randomly divided into 2 groups. Forty patients were treated with THA via SuperPATH approach (SuperPATH group), and 44 patients were treated with THA via posterolateral approach (PSA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, the type of disease, the complicating diseases, and preoperative thrombosis of lower extremity and Harris score between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of incision, postoperative drainage volume, unloaded activity time, Harris score, and short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36) score were compared. The postoperative X-ray films were used to observe the position of joint prosthesis. Results All patients were followed up 6-18 months (mean, 10.3 months). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of incision, postoperative drainage volume, and unloaded activity time in SuperPATH group were significantly superior to those in PSA group (P<0.05). The Harris score at 2 weeks and 1 month after operation were significantly higher in SuperPATH group than that in PSA group (P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in the Harris scores at 3 and 6 months after operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the SF-36 scores were higher in SuperPATH group than those in PSA group (P<0.05). Postoperative X-ray films showed the joint prosthesis was in good position. Conclusion THA via SuperPATH approach has the advantages of minimal invasion, safe, and rapid recovery, which is better than THA via posterolateral approach.
Objective To investigate the feasibility of anterolateral approach for L5 vertebral resection, bone grafting, and screw rod fixation by imaging and biomechanics researches. Methods Twenty formalized adult cadavers (12 males and 8 females) were randomly divided into 2 groups; L5 vertebral resection, bone graft, and screw rod fixation was performed on 10 specimens by using anterolateral approach (experimental group), and on the other 10 specimens by combined anterior and posterior approach. CT scanning and three-dimensional reconstruction were performed in the experimental group; preoperative maximal safe entry angle and depth of screws and intraoperative actual entry angle and depth of screws were measured; the sacral screw position was observed after operation. The biomechanical test was done in 2 groups. Results Twenty specimens smoothly underwent L5 excision and reconstruction. CT scan showed that there was no significant difference in maximal safe entry angle and depth of screws between males and females in experimental group before operation (P>0.05); the maximal safe entry angle and depth were 51.93° and 47.88 mm for anterior screw, and were 37.04° and 46.28 mm for posterior screw. After operation, depth of the sacral anterior and posterior screws were appropriate, which did not pierce into the spinal canal. The biomechanical test results indicated that the flexion, extension, and lateral flexion displacements, and vertical compression stiffness showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For L5 lesions not invading posterior column, to use L5 vertebral resection, bone graft, and screw rod fixation by anterolateral approach is a safe and feasible method to reconstruct lumbosacral stability, with the advantages of no changing posture, less operation time and incision, and prevention of bone graft shift, but effectiveness need further be identified.
Objective To evaluate the effect of anterolateral approach in treating thoracolumbar disc protrusion. Methods From May 2004 to May 2008, 11 patients with thoracolumbar disc protrusion (T10-L3) underwent discectomy, autologous il iac bone graft, and internal fixation via anterolateral approach. There were 9 males and 2 females aged 26-57 years old (average 42.8 years old). The course of disease was 1 week-11 years (average 2.7 years). Nine patients showed the lower l imbs weakness, 8 had sensory disturbance, 6 presented with lumbodorsal pain, 5 had the lower l imb pain, 4 presentedwith sphincter muscle disturbance, 3 suffered from foot drop, and 5 had a history of lower back injury. X-ray, CT, and MRI test showed that 9 cases had the single-segmental protrusion, 2 cases had double-segmental protrusion, 2 cases were accompanied with ossification of the thoracic vertebra yellow l igament, 2 cases were combined with ossification of the vertebra posterior longitudinal l igament, and 1 was compl icated with Scheuermann disease. Preoperatively, the intervertebral height was (7.2 ± 1.3) mm and JOA score was 6.4 ± 2.8. Results The time of operation was 2.5-5.5 hours (average 3.5 hours); the blood loss during operation was 500-1 200 mL (average 750 mL). During operation, intraoperative pleural tear occurred in 1 patient, peritoneal tear in 1 patient, and dural laceration in 1 patient. Repairing was performed intraoperative and preventive suction drainage was used for 3-5 days. No postoperative hydropneumothorax and cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred. All incisions healed by first intention. No postoperative compl ications of nerve system occurred. All the patients were followed up for 1-4 years (average 2.4 years). X-ray films showed that all the patients achieved bony fusion without the occurrence breakage and loosening of titanium plate and screw 6-9 months after operation. Three cases displayed subtle scol iosis (10-15°) without influence on spinal equil ibration. The intervertebral height increased to (12.3 ± 1.5) mm 2 weeks after operation, indicating there was a significant difference compared with preoperative value (P lt; 0.05). The intervertebral height 1 year after operation when the bony fusion was reached decreased to (7.5 ± 1.2) mm, indicating there was no significant difference compared to the preoperative value (P gt; 0.05). The JOA score increased to 7.6 ± 3.2 at 1 year after operation, indicating there was a significant difference compared with preoperative value (P lt; 0.05). The symptoms and signs of all the patients were improved to various degrees after operation. According to improvement rate evaluation system proposed by Hirabayashi t al., 4 cases were graded as excellent, 6 as good, 1 as fair, and the excellent and good rate was 90.9%. Conclusion Treating thoracolumbar disc protrusion via anterolateral approach is safe and effective.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of posteromedial and anterolateral approaches in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau collapsed and splited fractures. MethodsNineteen consecutive patients with posterolateral tibial plateau collapsed and splited fractures were treated between August 2010 and August 2013, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 13 males and 6 females, with an average age of 36.9 years (range, 25-75 years). All cases had closed fractures, involving 8 left sides and 11 right sides. Fractures involved posterior column according to the threecolumn classification based on CT scans; according to the Schatzker classification, all fractures were type Ⅱ; according to the AO/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation classification (AO/OTA), all fractures were type 41-B3.1.2. The interval between injury and operation was 7-14 days (mean, 9 days). The reduction of collapsed fractures and implantation of artificial bone allograft were supported by T-shaped distal radius plate via the posteromedial approach. The splited fractures was fixed by less invasive stabilization system (LISS) plate via the anterolateral approach. ResultsThe mean operation time was 69.0 minutes (range, 50-105 minutes). All incisions healed by first intention without neurovascular complications or wound infection. All patients were followed up 14-20 months (mean, 18.2 months). X-ray and CT examinations showed that collapsed tibial plateau and joint surface were completely corrected; bony union was obtained at 12 weeks on average (range, 10-16 weeks). No secondary collapsed fracture and knee varus or valgus occurred. The results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 2 cases with an excellent and good rate of 89.5% according to the Rasmussen's scoring system for knee function. ConclusionThe posteromedial approach combined with anterolateral approach for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures can fully expose the posterolateral aspects of the tibial plateau, and thus collapsed and splited fractures can be treated at the same time, which will lead to less operative time and good outcomes in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau collapsed and splited fractures.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of the modified posterolateral counter-curved incision with double intermuscular approach for the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 32 patients with posterolateral tibial plateau fractures between September 2012 and October 2014. There were 22 males and 10 females, aged 19 to 55 years (mean, 40.5 years). The causes of injury included traffic accident in 17 cases, falling from height in 9 cases, and falling in 6 cases. They had fresh closed fracture; injury to hospitalization time was 3 hours to 5 days (mean, 2 days). According to Schatzker tibial plateau fracture classification criteria, 20 cases were rated as type II, and 12 cases as type III. All patients underwent a modified posterolateral counter-curved incision with double intermuscular approach to expose tibial posterolateral condyle and anterolateral condyle. After a good visual control of fracture reduction, the anterolateral and posterolateral fractures were fixed with two-dimensional buttress plate respectively. ResultsThe incisions healed at stage I, with no major neurovascular injury. According to radiological assessment of the DeCoster score, the results were excellent in 21 cases, and fair in 11 cases. All of the 32 patients were followed up 18 to 30 months (mean, 20.5 months). The X-ray films showed that all patients obtained good fracture union, and the mean time of fracture union was 12.3 weeks (range, 10-16 weeks). No fixation failure or no obvious loss of articular surface reduction was observed during follow-up. The range of motion of the affected knees was 2-135° (mean, 120°). The mean American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score was 90.05 (range, 83-96) at 18 months after operation. ConclusionThe modified posterolateral counter-curved incision with double intermuscular approach could fully expose posterolateral tibia plateau, and good fracture reduction and reliable fixation can be obtained under direct vision.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of posterolateral approach lumbar interbody fusion assisted by one-hole split endoscope (OSE) and traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of L4, 5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). Methods The clinical data of 58 patients with DLS who met the selection criteria admitted between February 2020 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, of which 26 were treated with OSE-assisted posterolateral approach lumbar interbody fusion (OSE group) and 32 were treated with PLIF (PLIF group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, body mass index, Meyerding grade, lower limb symptom side, decompression side, stenosis type, and preoperative low back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, leg pain VAS score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the height of the anterior and posterior margins of the intervertebral space (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and complications were compared between the two groups. The low back pain and leg pain VAS scores and ODI before operation, at 1 month, 6 months after operation, and last follow-up, the height of anterior and posterior margins of the intervertebral space before operation, at 6 months after operation, and last follow-up, the modified MacNab criteria at last follow-up after operation were used to evaluate the effectiveness; and the Bridwell method at last follow-up was used to evaluate the interbody fusion. Results Both groups successfully completed the operation. Compared with the PLIF group, the OSE group showed a decrease in intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, but an increase in operation time, with significant differences (P<0.05). In the OSE group, no complication such as nerve root injury and thecal sac tear occurred; in the PLIF group, there were 1 case of thecal sac tear and 1 case of epidural hematoma, which were cured after conservative management. Both groups of patients were followed up 13-20 months with an average of 15.5 months. There was no complication such as loosening, sinking, or displacement of the fusion cage. The low back pain and leg pain VAS scores, ODI, and the height of anterior and posterior margins of the intervertebral space at each time point after operation in both groups were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). Except for the VAS score of lower back pain in the OSE group being significantly better than that in the PLIF group at 1 month after operation (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in all indicators between the two groups at all other time points (P>0.05). At last follow-up, both groups achieved bone fusion, and there was no significant difference in Bridwell interbody fusion and modified MacNab standard evaluation between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion OSE-assisted posterolateral approach lumbar interbody fusion for L4, 5 DLS, although the operation time is relatively long, but the postoperative hospitalization stay is short, the complications are few, the operation is safe and effective, and the early effectiveness is satisfactory.
To investigate the effectiveness and safety of microendoscopic decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods Between May 2006 and June 2009, 79 patients with lumbar stenosis were treated and divided into 2 groups: posterior lamina fenestration decompression (group A, n=37), endoscopic decompression via unilateral approach (group B, n=42). There was no significant difference in age, sex, segment level, and disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The cl inical outcomes were assessed by using the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disabil ity Index (ODI). The operation time, blood loss, compl ications were compared between 2 groups. Results Operations were successfully performed in all cases. The operation time, blood loss, and drainage volume were (75.0 ± 25.7) minutes, (140.3 ± 54.8) mL, and (46.5 ± 19.7) mL in group A, were (50.4 ± 18.2) minutes, (80.2 ± 35.7) mL, and (12.7 ± 5.3) mL in group B; there were significant differences between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). All the wounds healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-39 months (mean, 16 months). In group A, 1 patient suffered from intervertebral space infection after operation and recovered after conservative treatment; 4 patients had lumbar instabil ity after operation and recovered after lumbar interbody fusion combined with spine system internal fixation. In group B, 2 patients suffered from spinal dural rupture during operation and recovered after corresponding treatment, and no lumbar instabil ity was found. There was no significant difference in VAS score and ODI between 2 groups at preoperation (P gt; 0.05). Both VAS score and ODI were significantly improved at early stage after operation and last follow-up when compared with preoperation in each group (P lt; 0.05). Comparing with group A, there was significant improvement in VAS score at 24 hours postoperatively and in ODI at 1 month postoperatively in group B (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was observed at last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). According to cl inical evaluation of ODI mprovement rate, the excellent and good rate was 89.2% in group A and 92.9% in group B, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.896, P=0.827). Conclusion Comparing with posterior decompression surgery, microendoscopic decompression via unilateral approach is one of effective method to treat lumbar stenosis, with less trauma of fenestration yield and good early outcomes.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical significance of anterior median approach combined with lateral approach to the elbow joint in the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the data of 63 cases who used the anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach (group A, n=36) or the medial and lateral approach of the elbow (group B, n=27) in the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow between March 2014 and July 2019. The operation time, postoperative complications, and postoperative Mayo score of the elbow were compared between the two surgical approaches.ResultsThe operation time of group A and group B was (93.78±7.78) and (106.93±10.35) min, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The patients in both groups completed operations successfully, without vascular or nerve injury. All the wounds healed by first intention. No redislocation or reoperation occurred. Ten months after operation, there was no significant difference in the excellence rate of Mayo score of the elbow (83.3% vs. 85.2%) or postoperative complication rate (16.7% vs. 14.8%) between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionThe anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach and the medial and lateral elbow approach for the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow are equivalent to the postoperative elbow function recovery. The operation time of the former is shorter than that of the latter, and the anterior approach reveals the coronal process intuitively and sufficiently. In the case that there is no medial ligament injury, the anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach can be preferred.
ObjectiveTo study the effectiveness of a new anterolateral approach of distal femur in the treatment of type C distal femoral fractures by comparing with traditional lateral and anterolateral approaches. MethodsThe clinical data of 51 patients with type C distal femoral fractures treated between January 2008 and August 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Of 51 patients, 24 patients received the new anterolateral approach of distal femur combined with fixation of condylar buttress plate (modified group), and 27 patients underwent traditional lateral or anterolateral approach combined with fixation of condylar buttress plate (traditional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) classification, side, fracture type, complication, and the time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores of the knee at 3, 6, and 12 months were recorded. ResultsThe operation was successfully completed and the incision healed by first intention in all patients. The operation time and frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy of modified group were significantly less than those of traditional group (P<0.05). But the intraoperative blood loss and the hospitalization time showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-37 months (mean, 21.3 months). X-ray films showed all fractures were union. The fracture healing time was (12.92±2.24) weeks in the modified group and (13.24±2.52) weeks in the traditional group, showing no significant difference (t=0.476, P=0.637). The knee HSS scores of modified group were significantly higher than those of traditional group at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of knee varus or valgus, leg length discrepancy, internal fixator loosening, flexing dysfunction of knee, traumatic arthritis of knee, and total complications between 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionComparing with traditional lateral and anterolateral approaches, using the new anterolateral approach to treat type C distal femoral fractures has the advantages of less damage to soft tissue, excellent exposure, less operation time, and frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and better postoperative rehabilitation of knee joint.