ObjectiveTo investigate the technique and efficacy of left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) in elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF).MethodsFrom 2013 to 2018, 84 elderly patients with CAD and AF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF< 50%) underwent OPCABG in our department. There were 54 males and 30 females at age of 70-82 years. They were divided into a left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion group (n=56) and a non-LAA occlusion group (n=28). Postoperative antithrombotic therapy: the LAA occlusion group was given warfarin + aspirin + clopidogrel “triple antithrombotic therapy” for 3 months after operation, then was changed to aspirin + clopidogrel “dual antiplatelet” for long-term antithrombotic; the non-LAA occlusion group was given warfarin + aspirin + clopidogrel “triple antithrombotic” for long-term antithrombotic after operation. The clinical effectiveness of the two groups was compared.ResultsAll patients underwent the surgery successfully. There were 56 patients in the LAA occlusion group, including 44 patients of LAA exclusion and 12 patients of LAA clip. The time of LAA occlusion was 3 to 8 minutes. There was no injury of graft vessels and anastomotic stoma. Early postoperative death occurred in 2 patients (2.4%). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in postoperative hospital stay (P=0.115). Postoperative LVEF of the two groups significantly improved compared with that before operation (P<0.05). There was no stroke or bleeding in important organs during hospitalization. During follow-up of 1 year, no cerebral infarction occurred in both groups, but the incidence of bleeding related complications in the LAA occlusion group was significantly lower than that in the non-LAA occlusion group (3.6% vs. 18.5%, P=0.036).ConclusionFor elderly patients with CAD and AF with reduced LVEF, LAA occlusion during OPCABG can effectively reduce the risk of stroke and bleeding related complications, and without increasing the risk of surgery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of thoracoscopy-assisted epicardial radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE).MethodsThe clinical data of 12 patients with solitary AF admitted to Beijing Tiantan Hospital from November 2018 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 7 males and 5 females, with an average age of 65.2±5.3 years. Of them, 2 had paroxysmal AF, 1 had persistent AF and 9 had permanent AF.ResultsNo patient died during hospitalization, 5 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation for AF and LAAE, and 6 received LAAE alone. The operation time was 293±70 min in radiofrequency ablation for AF+LAAE patients and 71±14 min in LAAE patients. Two patients restored sinus rhythm, two restored after electric cardioversion, and one remained AF in AF+LAAE patients. Postoperatively, 1 patient had pleural effusion and 1 had subcutaneous emphysema. No stroke was observed.ConclusionThoracoscopy-assisted radiofrequency ablation for AF and/or LAAE reduce the risk of procedure, and provide alternative approach to treat AF-associated diseases. However, large sample size studies using prospective cohort designs are required to corroborate the present findings.
ObjectiveTo summarize the experience and efficacy of "one-stop" left atrial appendage clipping (LAAC) combined with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and aortic valve disease. Methods From April 2018 to March 2021, 16 patients with AF and severe aortic valve disease underwent "one-stop" LAAC and TAVR in our department. All patients had long-standing persistent AF. There were 10 males and 6 females with an average age of 77.2±6.2 years. CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.4±0.8 points, and HAS-BLED score was 3.5±0.7 points. ResultsAll patients successfully underwent "one-stop" LAAC combined with TAVR. There was no death during perioperative and follow-up periods. The length of the left atrial appendage base measured during the operation was 37.8±3.5 mm. The types of atrial appendage clip were 35 mm (n=3), 40 mm (n=8) and 45 mm (n=5). The time required for clipping the left atrial appendage (from skin cutting to skin suturing) was 25.7±3.8 min. There was no stroke or bleeding of important organs during the perioperative period. The average hospital stay was 6.8±2.0 d. The follow-up time was 19.6±10.1 months, during which there was no patient of cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction. During the administration of warfarin, 2 patients had subcutaneous ecchymosis and 1 patient had gingival bleeding. Conclusion"One-stop" LAAC combined with TAVR can be safely and effectively used to treat AF and aortic valve disease patients with high risk of thromboembolism and anticoagulant bleeding. The early and middle-term curative effect is satisfactory.
Objective To systematically evaluate the safety, efficacy, and economics of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) versus transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Methods PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Database were systematically searched to collect relevant studies on comparing ICE and TEE-guided LAAO from inception to June 15th, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literatures, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 and R 4.0.3. Retrospective cohort studies were excluded for sensitivity analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the types of occluder and ICE catheter. Results A total of 14 studies with 6 599 patients were included. Meta-analyses showed no statistical differences in technical success rate, overall complications, device embolization, peri-device leakage, device-related thrombus, stroke, vascular complications, bleeding, operation time, fluoroscopy time, or contrast agent volume between the ICE and TEE-guided LAAO. The total in-room time (MD=–33.47 min, 95%CI –41.20 to –25.73, P<0.00001) and radiation dosage (MD=–170.20 mGy, 95%CI –309.79 to –30.62, P=0.02) were lower in the ICE group than those in the TEE group, whereas the incidence of pericardial effusion/tamponade was higher than the TEE group (RR=1.57, 95%CI 1.01 to 2.45, P=0.048). Except for pericardial effusion/tamponade, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analysis showed similar results. The analysis based on the cost data from the United States showed comparable or even lower total costs for ICE versus TEE, but comparative domestic cost studies were lacking. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that ICE-guided LAAO can reduce radiation dosage and total in-room time, and there is no statistical difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups. Owing to the limitations of sample size and quality of the included studies, the conclusion still needs to be verified by large sample size and high-quality randomized controlled trials.
Surgical treatment of atrial septal defect (ASD) mainly includes occlusion or repair under cardiopulmonary bypass. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation includes transcatheter radiofrequency ablation or Maze surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass. There are many treatments for ASD patients combined with atrial fibrillation, but each has its own advantages and disadvantages. We reported an ASD patient combined with atrial fibrillation treated by totally endoscopic "one-stop" radiofrequency ablation and simultaneous transthoracic ASD occlusion of atrial fibrillation, with good postoperative results.
ObjectiveTo summarize the efficacy of clips and staplers for left atrial appendage in the thoracoscopic treatment of atrial fibrillation. Methods The clinical data of patients with atrial fibrillation treated in Xinhua Hospital from 2015 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received Mei's minimally invasive surgery for atrial fibrillation. Among them, patients were recruited in a clip group by clipping the left atrial appendage. The other patients were recruited in a stapler group to resect the left atrial appendage by stapler. Follow-up was conducted by outpatient clinic and telephone. Postoperative heart rhythm was recorded by the patient's symptoms, electrocardiogram and 24 h holter. Cranial magnetic resonance, cardiac CT and echocardiography were performed at least once during follow-up. Results There were 30 patients in the clip group, including 20 males and 10 females, with an average age of 65.7±7.1 years. There were 30 patients in the stapler group, including 20 males and 10 females with an average age of 66.8±5.4 years. All patients successfully received the procedure, with no conversion to thoracotomy or perioperative death. Sinus rhythm was maintained at discharge in 56 (93.3%) patients. Till June 2020, 59 patients were followed up for 42-66 (54.1±7.3) months and 1 patient in the clip group was lost. The residual length of the left atrial appendage was 3.9±1.8 mm in the clip group and 3.9±2.8 mm in the stapler group, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.910). Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that there was no statistical difference in the maintenance of sinus rhythm between the two groups (P=0.757). During the follow-up period, all patients had no cerebrovascular adverse events such as stroke or embolism. Conclusion Clipping and resection of the left atrial appendage in thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation surgery are both safe and effective methods, which effectively prevent stroke. The atrial appendage clip makes the minimally invasive surgical intervention of the left atrial appendage safer and more convenient.
ObjectiveTo compare the surgical effects of totally thoracoscopic and thoracoscopic-assisted small incision for left atrial appendage clipping. Methods The clinical data of patients who underwent left atrial appendage clipping surgery via totally thoracoscopy or thoracoscopic-assisted minimally invasive small incision from November 2018 to March 2022 in Beijing Tiantan Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical approach, they were divided into a totally thoracoscopic group and a small incision group. The clinical results were compared between the two groups. ResultsA totoal of 41 patients were enrolled, including 30 males and 11 females, with an average age of 66.6±6.1 years. There were 23 patients in the totally thoracoscopic group and 18 patients in the small incision group. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.5±1.1 points, and HAS-BLED score was 3.7±1.5 points. No death occured in the whole group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of operation time, chest complications, successful rate of closure of the left atrial appendage, residual length of the left atrial appendage, or displacement of the atrial appendage clip (P>0.05). The total drainage volume in the totally thoracoscopic group was less than that in the small incision group, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.031). The median follow-up time was 10 (1-30) months, during which there was 1 patient of stroke and 1 patient of left atrial thrombus in both groups. ConclusionTotally thoracoscopic left atrial appendage clipping is less invasive than thoracoscopic-assisted minimally invasive small incision surgery and does not increase the risk of surgical complications.
Patients with atrial fibrillation complicated with kidney disease have a high risk of stroke and bleeding, and have some limitations or contraindications to oral anticoagulants. Left atrial appendage closure has been used as an alternative to oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation, but its efficacy and safety in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease need to be further confirmed. This paper intends to review the research progress of left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation complicated with chronic renal insufficiency.
[Abstract]Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common arrhythmias and significantly increases the risk of stroke, and the left atrial appendage is the main source of thrombus. Therefore, the management of the left atrial appendage in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation can effectively prevent stroke. However, there are various strategies to manage the left atrial appendage, each with advantages and disadvantages, and their effect of stroke prevention are not the same. Therefore, we evaluated the three most common surgical strategies, including left atrial appendage resection, left atrial appendage ligation and left atrial appendage clamp. We discussed the effect of these strategies on stroke prevention based on multiple dimensions such as surgical difficulty, surgical cost and postoperative stroke incidence, thus trying to provide some guidance for the selection of left atrial appendage treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation.