ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of driving pressure-guided lung protective ventilation strategy on lung function in adult patients under elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.MethodsIn this randomized controlled trial, 106 patients scheduled for elective valve surgery via median sternal incision under cardiopulmonary bypass from July to October 2020 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were included in final analysis. Patients were divided into two groups randomly. Both groups received volume-controlled ventilation. A protective ventilation group (a control group, n=53) underwent traditional lung protective ventilation strategy with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O and received conventional protective ventilation with tidal volume of 7 mL/kg of predicted body weight and PEEP of 5 cm H2O, and recruitment maneuver. An individualized PEEP group (a driving pressure group, n=53) received the same tidal volume and recruitment, but with individualized PEEP which produced the lowest driving pressure. The primary outcome was oxygen index (OI) after ICU admission in 30 minutes, and the secondary outcomes were the incidence of OI below 300 mm Hg, the severity of OI descending scale (the Berlin definition), the incidence of pulmonary complications at 7 days after surgery and surgeons’ satisfaction on ventilation.ResultsThere was a statistical difference in OI after ICU admission in 30 minutes between the two groups (273.5±75.5 mm Hg vs. 358.0±65.3 mm Hg, P=0.00). The driving pressure group had lower incidence of postoperative OI<300 mm Hg (16.9% vs. 49.0%, OR=0.21, 95%CI 0.08-0.52, P=0.00) and less severity of OI classification than the control group (P=0.00). The incidence of pulmonary complications at 7 days after surgery was comparable between the driving pressure group and the control group (28.3% vs. 33.9%, OR=0.76, 95%CI 0.33-1.75, P=0.48). The atelectasis rate was lower in the driving pressure group (1.0% vs. 15.0%, OR=0.10, 95%CI 0.01-0.89, P=0.01).ConclusionApplication of driving pressure-guided ventilation is associated with a higher OI and less lung injury after ICU admission compared with the conventional protective ventilation in patients having valve surgery.
[Abstract]The number of lung transplantation is gradually increasing worldwide, which brings new challenges to the multi-disciplinary team of lung transplantation. The prognosis of lung transplant recipients is seriously affected by the pathophysiological state of specific lung diseases and perioperative risk factors. It is of great significance for these patients to optimize perioperative management according to these factors. Recently, several expert consensus have been published regarding anesthesia management of lung transplantation. Based on the current evidence and clinical practice of West China Hospital, this review summarizes the key points of anesthesia management for lung transplant recipients to guide anesthesiologists' clinical practice.
Objective To investigate the effects of different ventilation modes on postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Methods The patients who underwent upper abdominal surgery under general anesthesia in Chengdu Office Hospital of the People’s Government of Tibet Autonomous Region between February 2020 and February 2021 were selected. Patients were randomly divided into volume controlled ventilation (VCV) group, pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) group, and pressure controlled ventilation-volume guarantee (PCV-VG) group according to the random number table method. All the three groups adopted the internationally recognized lung protective ventilation strategy. The transcutaneous arterial oxygen saturation and respiratory mechanics indicators of three different time periods, as well as pulmonary symptoms and signs and laboratory imaging examinations 7 days after surgery were recorded. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the three groups of patients were evaluated using the Melbourne Group Scale Version 2. Results A total of 120 patients were included, with 40 in each group. There was no statistically significant difference in the general situation of the three groups of patients (P>0.05). The platform pressure and compliance of three different time periods all changed over time (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the occurrence of pulmonary complications and hospital stay among the three groups 7 days after surgery (P<0.05). Conclusion Under the internationally recognized lung protective ventilation strategy, PCV-VG mode can significantly reduce the incidence of pulmonary complications 7 days after abdominal surgery, shorten the length of hospital stay, and improve the quality of life in elderly patients.